Search

Objective: To identify current opinions among orthopedic traumatologists relating to technical aspects of internal fixation and arthroplasty for patients with femoral neck fractures., Methods: We developed and administered a survey to orthopedic surgeons who were members of the Orthopedic Trauma Association and European clinics affiliated with AO International (Davos, Switzerland). Surgeons reported preferences in specific aspects of the surgical technique for internal fixation as well as arthroplasty. Each surgeon received either a mailed package (7-page survey, a personalized cover letter, and a stamped return envelope) or an email with a link to the same survey on the Internet with an identification code. At 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks after the initial mailing, we remailed the questionnaire to all nonresponders., Results: Of the 442 surgeons who were sent the questionnaire, 298 (68%) responded. The typical respondent was a North American aged more than 40 years, in academic practice, supervised residents, had fellowship training in trauma, and worked in a low-volume center. Among surgeons who treated displaced femoral neck fractures with arthroplasty, significant disparities existed in terms of the type of anesthesia (51% preferring general anesthesia), surgical approach (47% used posterior approach), and placement of unipolar implants (50%). Surgeons tended to agree on the use of cement fixation (69%), repairing the capsule (80%), and not using a drain postoperatively (68%). Surgeons who preferentially treated hip fractures with internal fixation tended to have a lack of consensus in terms of what constituted acceptable surgical delays (43% allowing greater than 48 hours) and which screw configuration to use, with more than half using a triangle with base inferior construct. Surgeons tended to agree on the use of closed fracture reduction techniques (69%), three cannulated screws (73%), and did not routinely perform a capsulotomy (80%) or aspirate the fracture hematoma (90%). Within both treatment groups (internal fixation and arthroplasty), surgeons tended to agree on the use of perioperative antibiotics (>92%), thromboprophylaxis (98%), and postoperative weight bearing status (>87%)., Conclusions: A general lack of consensus exists among orthopedic trauma surgeons in the management of displaced femoral neck fractures. With an ever-growing emphasis upon the practice of evidence-based medicine, we have demonstrated several disparities in the technical aspects of fixation and perioperative care likely caused by a general lack of available evidence. We recommend the need for future research and large collaborative efforts.

Background: Hip fractures occur in 280,000 North Americans each year. Although surgeons have reached consensus with regard to the treatment of undisplaced fractures of the hip, the surgical treatment of displaced fractures remains controversial. Identifying surgeons' preferences in techniques, and the rationale for their choices, may aid in focusing educational activities to the orthopaedic community as well as planning future clinical trials. Our objective was to clarify current opinion with regard to the operative treatment of displaced fractures of the femoral neck., Methods: We used a cross-sectional survey design and a sample-to-redundancy strategy to examine surgeons' preferences in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures. We mailed this survey to members of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association and European-AO International-affiliated trauma centers., Results: Of 442 surgeons who received the questionnaire, 298 (67%) responded. The typical respondent was a North American man over the age of forty years who was in academic practice, supervised residents, had fellowship training in trauma, and worked in a low-volume center (<100 hip fractures per year), treating an equal proportion of displaced and undisplaced femoral neck fractures. Most surgeons believed that internal fixation was the procedure of choice in younger patients (those who are less than sixty years old) with a displaced fracture (Garden type III or IV). For patients over eighty years old with Garden type-III or IV fractures, almost all surgeons preferred arthroplasty. Respondents varied widely in their preferences for the treatment of patients who were sixty to eighty years old with a displaced fracture (Garden type III or IV) or active patients with a Garden type-III fracture. Many surgeons believed there was no difference between arthroplasty and internal fixation when considering mortality (45%), infection rates (30%), and quality of life (37%). Surgeons also revealed variable preferences in their choice of the optimal approach to arthroplasty for patients between sixty and eighty years old with a type-IV fracture (32% preferred unipolar; 41%, bipolar; and 17%, total hip arthroplasty) and in the optimal choice of implant for internal fixation., Conclusions: While surgeons prefer internal fixation for younger patients and arthroplasty for older patients, they disagree about the optimal approach to the management of patients between sixty and eighty years old with a displaced fracture and active patients with a Garden type-III fracture. Surgeons also disagree on the optimal implants for internal fixation or arthroplasty.