Search

• In 2022, newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) for CF is undertaken in 30 European countries, 26 of them are national programmes. • Some programmes are still not achieving ECFS standards. Compared to 2014, there is an improvement in sensitivity but a deterioration in achieving a sufficient PPV. • There continues to be a wide variety of approaches, but the majority of national programmes are now using DNA analysis as a 2nd tier • This survey demonstrates areas of good practice, but there is considerable scope for improvement in the quality of NBS for CF across Europe. • The framework of the 20 parameters to calculate the 8 key outcomes should be part of any annual report of a CF NBS programme, and thus improve future surveys. The aim of this study was to record the current status of newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) for CF across Europe and assess performance. Survey of representatives of NBS for CF programmes across Europe. Performance was assessed through a framework developed in a previous exercise. In 2022, we identified 22 national and 34 regional programmes in Europe. Barriers to establishing NBS included cost and political inertia. Performance was assessed from 2019 data reported by 21 national and 21 regional programmes. All programmes employed different protocols, with IRT-DNA the most common strategy. Six national and 11 regional programmes did not use DNA analysis. Integrating DNA analysis into the NBS protocol improves PPV, but at the expense of increased carrier and CFSPID recognition. Some programmes employ strategies to mitigate these outcomes. Programmes should constantly strive to improve performance but large datasets are needed to assess outcomes reliably. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Newborn screening (NBS) for cystic fibrosis (CF) is a well-established public health strategy with international standards. The aim of this study was to provide an update on NBS for CF in Europe and assess performance against the standards. Methods Questionnaires were sent to key workers in each European country. Results In 2016, there were 17 national programmes, 4 countries with regional programmes and 25 countries not screening in Europe. All national programmes employed different protocols, with IRT-DNA the most common strategy. Five countries were not using DNA analysis. In addition, the processing and structure of programmes varied considerably. Most programmes were achieving the ECFS standards with respect to timeliness, but were less successful with respect to sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions There has been a steady increase in national CF NBS programmes across Europe with variable strategies and outcomes that reflect the different approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is wide agreement on the benefits of NBS for CF in terms of lowered disease severity, decreased burden of care, and reduced costs. Risks are mainly associated with disclosure of carrier status and diagnostic uncertainty. When starting a NBS programme for CF it is important to take precautions in order to minimise avoidable risks and maximise benefits. In Europe more than 25 screening programmes have been developed, with quite marked variation in protocol design. However, given the wide geographic, ethnic, and economic variations, complete harmonisation of protocols is not appropriate. There is little evidence to support the use of IRT alone as a second tier, without involving DNA mutation analysis. However, if IRT/DNA testing does not lead to the desired specificity/sensitivity ratio in a population, a screening programme based on IRT/IRT may be used. Sweat chloride concentration remains the gold standard for discriminating between NBS false and true positives, but age-related changes in sweat chloride should be taken into account. CF phenotypes associated with less severe disease often have intermediate or normal sweat chloride concentrations. Programmes should include arrangements for counselling and management of infants where the diagnosis is not clear-cut. All newborns identified by NBS should be managed according to internationally accepted guidelines. CF centre care and the availability of necessary medication are essential prerequisites before the introduction of NBS programmes. Clear explanation to families of the process of screening and of implications of normal and abnormal results is central to the success of CF NBS programmes. Effective communication is especially important when parents are told that their child is affected or is a carrier. When establishing a NBS programme for CF, attention should be given to ensuring timely and appropriate processing of results, to minimise potential stress for families.