Search

Background In prior unblinded studies, cardiac neuromodulation therapy (CNT) employing a sequence of variably timed short and longer atrioventricular intervals yielded sustained reductions of systolic blood pressure (SBP) in patients with hypertension. The effects of CNT on SBP were investigated in this double-blind randomized pilot study. Methods and Results Eligible patients had daytime ambulatory SBP (aSBP) ≥130 mm Hg and office SBP ≥140 mm Hg despite taking ≥1 antihypertensive medication, and an indication for a dual-chamber pacemaker. Patients underwent Moderato device implantation, which was programmed as a standard pacemaker during a 1-month run-in phase. Patients whose daytime aSBP was ≥125 mm Hg at the end of this period were randomized (1:1, double blind) to treatment (CNT) or control (CNT inactive). The primary efficacy end point was the between-group difference of the change in 24-hour aSBP at 6 months. Of 68 patients initially enrolled and who underwent implantation with the Moderato system, 47 met criteria for study continuation and were randomized (26 treatment, 21 control). The mean age was 74.0±8.7 years, 64% were men, left ventricular ejection fraction was 59.2%±5.7%, and aSBP averaged 141.0±10.8 mm Hg despite the use of 3.3±1.5 antihypertensive medications; 81% had isolated systolic hypertension. Six months after randomization, aSBP was 11.1±10.5 mm Hg (95% CI, -15.2 to -8.1 mm Hg) lower than prerandomization in the treatment group compared with 3.1±9.5 mm Hg (-7.4 to 1.2 mm Hg) lower in controls, yielding a net treatment effect of 8.1±10.1 mm Hg (-14.2 to -1.9 mm Hg) ( P =0.012). There were no Moderato device- or CNT-related adverse events. Conclusions CNT significantly reduced 24-hour aSBP in patients with hypertension with a clinical indication for a pacemaker. The majority of patients had isolated systolic hypertension, a particularly difficult group of patients to treat. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02837445.

Background: Multiple randomised clinical trials have proven that cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) reduces morbidity and mortality in appropriately selected patients with congestive heart failure and is recommended for such patients as per the European Society of Cardiology guidelines., Aim: In this paper we compare the indications and demographics in cardiac resynchronisation recipients in Poland and other European countries., Methods: In 2015 and 2016, physicians from 42 European countries participated in the second edition of the European Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Survey. For 14 months, 288 implanting centres gathered data regarding demography, indications, implanting methods, and guidance compatibility from 11,088 patients receiving CRT., Results: The survey revealed that a vast group of patients were eligible for CRT implantation (although some of them with rela-tively weak guidance recommendations) and showed essential variety in clinical practice when national data were benchmarked., Conclusions: The population of CRT recipients in Poland and other European countries did not differ in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. In most cases, indications for CRT were in accordance with the guidelines; however some devices were implanted in patients beyond the guideline recommendations. For these procedures, the decision regarding CRT im-plantation relies mainly on the physicians' experience.

Aims: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the most important cardiovascular risk factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical correlates of DM, including management and outcomes, in the EURObservational Research Programme (EORP)-Atrial Fibrillation (AF) General Pilot (EORP-AF) Registry of the European Society of Cardiology., Methods and Results: We studied consecutive patients (N = 3101) enrolled in 70 centres of nine European countries between February 2012 and March 2013, and compared diabetics with non-diabetics during a 1-year follow-up. In the overall cohort, the prevalence of DM was 20.6%. Diabetics were older (71 ± 9 vs. 68 ± 12 years, P < 0.0001) and had more comorbidities, higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (4.6 ± 1.6 vs. 2.9 ± 1.7, P < 0.0001) and higher prevalence of permanent AF (21.5 vs. 16.0%, P = 0.0022). Quality of life amongst DM patients was significantly worse [atrial fibrillation quality of life questionnaire (AF-QoL) score 45.2 ± 19.2 vs. 49.3 ± 20.1, P < 0.0001]. Amongst diabetics, the use of electrical cardioversion (16.2 vs. 24.6%, P < 0.0001) and catheter ablation (3.3 vs. 8.6%, P < 0.0001) was lower, whilst oral anticoagulants were more often prescribed (84.3 vs. 78.9%, P = 0.0027). After one year, diabetic patients had significantly higher all-cause (11.9 vs. 4.9%, P < 0.0001), cardiovascular (6.2 vs. 1.9%, P < 0.0001), and non-cardiovascular mortality (2.3 vs. 1.1%, P = 0.0356)., Conclusion: In AF patients, DM is associated with a higher prevalence of comorbidities and a worse quality of life. After one year, all-cause, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular mortality were significantly higher in diabetic subjects.