1. PIT-EASY survey: validation of the European Pituitary Pathology Group proposal for reporting pituitary neuroendocrine tumors.
- Author
-
Birtolo MF, Jouinot A, Vasiljevic A, Boulagnon-Rombi C, Asioli S, Bousdira G, Tetka LMM, Perbet R, Maurage CA, Appay R, Figarella-Branger D, Gauchotte G, Sturm N, Baussart B, Roncaroli F, Bertherat J, Brue T, and Villa C
- Subjects
- Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Prospective Studies, Female, Reproducibility of Results, Middle Aged, Biomarkers, Tumor analysis, Europe, Adult, Pituitary Neoplasms pathology, Pituitary Neoplasms diagnosis, Neuroendocrine Tumors pathology, Neuroendocrine Tumors diagnosis
- Abstract
The aim of this multicenter prospective survey called PIT-EASY was to assess the relevance of the European Pituitary Pathology Group (EPPG) diagnostic tools for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) to improve the quality of their histological diagnosis. Each center performed at least 30 histological cases of PitNETs using the EPPG tools and assessed their value using a scorecard with 10 questions. For each center, the histological cases were carried out by pathologists with varying levels of expertise in pituitary pathology defined as junior, intermediate, and expert. Two hundred and ninety histological cases were collected from six French and Italian centers. The three EPPG tools were validated and regarded as helpful for a more accurate and time-efficient diagnosis. The usefulness of level 2 and level 3 of the "EPPG's multi-step approach for immunohistochemistry" including pituitary transcription factors (PIT1, TPIT, and SF1) and chromogranin, SSTRs, and P53 respectively was higher in "other non-functioning" (silent plurihormonal PIT1, silent corticotroph, and null cell): 88% vs 32%, p < 10-6 and 42% vs 14%, p = 0.002, respectively. The diagnostic algorithm proved more useful for junior pathologists (p = 0.0001) and those with intermediate experience. PIT-EASY survey confirmed the importance of a standardized approach to PitNETs for an accurate and reproducible diagnosis and served as validation of the EPPG proposal. The tool appeared to be of practical value to junior participants and staff with intermediate experience for safe routine diagnostic reporting., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF