Search

Introduction The bleeding propensity in von Willebrand disease ( VWD) is usually moderate or mild and patients with VWD do not need continuous treatment, but do require extra increased haemostatic cover when undergoing dental or surgical procedures. Desmopressin can be effective in certain patient groups and this has been considered in a previous publication. Aim This paper now seeks to evaluate current knowledge and practice in the use of factor concentrate in the management of VWD patients undergoing invasive procedures. Methods A literature search was performed on the use of factor concentrates to cover invasive procedures and a survey of current practice in a number of specialist haematology centres across Europe represented by the European Haemophilia Strategy Board was conducted. Results Our review of the literature and the results of the survey showed considerable heterogeneity in treatment regimens, and a lack of consistency in reporting of the variables that determine factor concentrate dosing and monitoring. Conclusion By analysing the literature, examining guidelines and using consensus deliberation, this survey allowed the group to develop recommendations for management of VWD patients undergoing invasive procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In patients with haemophilia A, factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis reduces bleeding frequency and joint damage compared with on-demand therapy. To assess the effect of prophylaxis initiation age, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to evaluate bone and cartilage damage in patients with severe haemophilia A. In this cross-sectional, multinational investigation, patients aged 12-35 years were assigned to 1 of 5 groups: primary prophylaxis started at age <2 years (group 1); secondary prophylaxis started at age 2 to <6 years (group 2), 6 to <12 years (group 3), or 12-18 years (group 4); or on-demand treatment (group 5). Joint status at ankles and knees was assessed using Compatible Additive MRI scoring (maximum and mean ankle; maximum and mean of all 4 joints) and Gilbert scores in the per-protocol population (n = 118). All prophylaxis groups had better MRI joint scores than the on-demand group. MRI scores generally increased with current patient age and later start of prophylaxis. Ankles were the most affected joints. In group 1 patients currently aged 27-35 years, the median of maximum ankle scores was 0.0; corresponding values in groups 4 and 5 were 17.0 and 18.0, respectively [medians of mean index joint scores: 0.0 (group 1), 8.1 (group 2) and 13.8 (group 4)]. Gilbert scores revealed outcomes less pronounced than MRI scores. MRI scores identified pathologic joint status with high sensitivity. Prophylaxis groups had lower annualized joint bleeds and MRI scores vs. the on-demand group. Primary prophylaxis demonstrated protective effects against joint deterioration compared with secondary prophylaxis., (© 2014 The Authors. Haemophilia Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)