Search

Background: A variety of treatment methods have so far been described for unicameral bone cysts (UBC). However, to the best of our knowledge, no particular consensus has yet been reached on when to operatively treat a patient with a humeral UBC. Therefore, members of the European Pediatric Orthopedic Society (EPOS) and Pediatric Orthopedic Society of North America (POSNA) were surveyed to characterize current treatment preferences., Methods: An online electronic questionnaire was sent out to all registered EPOS and POSNA members. The survey comprised 45 questions related to the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up characteristics of patients with UBCs of the humerus. Particular questions related to the nonoperative or surgical treatment of pathologic proximal humerus and humeral shaft fractures were also included., Results: In total, 444 participants (132 EPOS and 292 POSNA members) responded, of whom 400 were actively involved in UBC treatment. The preferred diagnostic modalities to confirm the diagnosis of a UBC in the humerus were radiographs (88%), MRI in cases of questionable diagnosis (58%) or CT scan (8%). For painless UBCs 67% prefer no treatment at all except when the fracture risk is deemed high (then 53% recommend surgery); 71% of respondents would treat painful UBCs with surgery. Most common surgical techniques comprise curettage (45%), artificial bone substitutes (37%), corticosteroid injection (29%), or intramedullary stabilization (eg, rodding; 24%).Fractured, nondisplaced and mildly displaced proximal humerus UBCs and mildly displaced pathologic humerus shaft fractures are all preferably treated nonoperatively (94%, 91%, 83%, respectively). Severely displaced pathologic proximal humerus fractures are treated less often conservatively (36%) than surgically (40%), and severely displaced humerus shaft fractures are preferably treated surgically (63%) by intramedullary stabilization (60%)., Conclusions: There is great variation among EPOS and POSNA members with regards to the diagnosis and treatment of UBCs in the humerus. Although some consensus on general treatment principles is seen, specific surgical treatment indications vary.Prospective randomized-controlled studies are needed to evaluate the outcomes of the different surgical approaches compared with nonoperative strategies., Level of Evidence: Level V-expert opinion.

Chronic lymphatic leukaemia (CLL) is one of the most common leukaemic diseases in middle Europe. Pathological fractures are rare findings in patients with CLL. The diagnosis of CLL is in most cases an incidental finding as it often stays asymptomatic for years. This article presents an interesting case of a 65-year-old male patient with known asymptomatic CLL for 5 years and fractures of the proximal femur and proximal radius after trauma. During the hospital stay the patient suffered multiple pathological fractures with histological findings of bony infiltration of the CLL and an acute phase, which was treated by combination chemotherapy.

Background: Approximately one in five patients with giant cell tumor of bone presents with a pathologic fracture. However, recurrence rates after resection or curettage differ substantially in the literature and it is unclear when curettage is reasonable after fracture., Questions/purposes: We therefore determined: (1) local recurrence rates after curettage with adjuvants or en bloc resection; (2) complication rates after both surgical techniques and whether fracture healing occurred after curettage with adjuvants; and (3) function after both treatment modalities for giant cell tumor of bone with a pathologic fracture., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 48 patients with fracture from among 422 patients treated between 1981 and 2009. The primary treatment was resection in 25 and curettage with adjuvants in 23 patients. Minimum followup was 27 months (mean, 101 months; range, 27-293 months)., Results: Recurrence rate was higher after curettage with adjuvants when compared with resection (30% versus 0%). Recurrence risk appears higher with soft tissue extension. The complication rate was lower after curettage with adjuvants when compared with resection (4% versus 16%) and included aseptic loosening of prosthesis, allograft failure, and pseudoarthrosis. Tumor and fracture characteristics did not increase complication risk. Fracture healing occurred in 24 of 25 patients. Mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was higher after curettage with adjuvants (mean, 28; range, 23-30; n = 18) when compared with resection (mean, 25; range, 13-30; n = 25)., Conclusions: Our observations suggest curettage with adjuvants is a reasonable option for giant cell tumor of bone with pathologic fractures. Resection should be considered with soft tissue extension, fracture through a local recurrence, or when structural integrity cannot be regained after reconstruction., Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) been included in two representative guidelines, one issued from European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ESCEO) and the other from National Osteoporosis Foundation in U.S. (NOF). Both guidelines commonly set the new track for the use of FRAX with BMD in addition to the conventional algorithm based on BMD and clinical risk factors. However, two guidelines differ in determining intervention threshold values of FRAX. ESCEO guideline proposed age-dependent values of, such as approximately 15%, 20%, and 30% of 10-year fracture probability for major osteoporotic fractures at the respective ages of 60, 70, and 80 years for postmenopausal women. On the other hand, NOF guideline indicated the fixed value 20% for osteoporotic fracture or 3% for hip fracture at the ages of 50 or more. These two different approaches may provide clues when including FRAX in the guideline for clinicians in Japan.

Osteoporosis is an increasingly frequent pathology, especially due to the remarkable increase in the average age of the population. It is a skeletal disorder characterized by a reduction in bone strength which predisposes to increased fracture risk. It has been calculated that there are more than 200 million osteoporotic subjects in the world: one in three women and one in eight men over 50 years of age have osteoporosis. Although it is very widespread, only one quarter of cases are treated, and a significant percentage is not even diagnosed. As a result of these serious consequences, diagnostic and therapeutic treatment is necessary to reduce its progression. The importance of acquiring reliable epidemiological data has also been proven, in order to emphasize the effects of the condition, and to provide elements to optimize the strategies of prevention and care.

The objective of this study was to estimate the unit costs of non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures in five European countries based on the results of the SOTI and TROPOS clinical trials in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. The information recorded in the Case Report Forms was used. The perspective of third party payers was adopted. Hip fracture unit cost was the highest. The ranges of costs among countries was narrow for hip from 8,346 euros (Italy) to 9,907euros (France), but wider for other fractures: 890 euros (Spain) to 2,022 euros (Italy) for wrist, 1,167euros (Spain) to 3,268 euros (Italy) for pelvis, 837euros (Spain) to 2,116 euros (Italy) for sternum/clavicle, 565 euros (Spain) to 908 euros (France) for rib, 1,518 euros (Spain) to 3,651 euros (Belgium) for humerus, 1,805 euros (Spain) to 3,521 euros (Italy) for leg. The costs of those fractures should be considered when estimating the cost of osteoporosis.

Purpose of Review: Osteoporosis remains a major public health problem through its association with fragility fractures. Recent data suggest that the annual cost in Europe is 13 billion euros, mainly accounted for by hospitalisation after fracture. Understanding the epidemiology of osteoporosis is an essential step in developing strategies to reduce the burden of osteoporotic fracture in the population., Recent Findings: This article will review recent advances surrounding the epidemiology of osteoporosis, the burden of fracture in children and adults in this country and abroad, morbidity associated with such fractures, associations of disease and medication with fragility fracture, and advances in diagnostic techniques and identification of at-risk groups., Summary: The papers studied highlight the wealth of high-quality research in this field, and they help in the visualisation of strategies to identify individuals at high risk of fragility fracture and to quantify fracture risk by measurement of bone density, bone quality, and risk factor algorithms.

Background: A high prevalence of osteoporosis has been noted in Crohn's disease, but data about fractures are scarce., Methods: The relationship between low bone mineral density and the prevalence of vertebral fractures was studied in 271 patients with ileo-caecal Crohn's disease in a large European/Israeli study. One hundred and eighty-one currently steroid-free patients with active Crohn's disease (98 completely steroid-naive) and 90 steroid-dependent patients with inactive or quiescent Crohn's disease were investigated by dual X-ray absorptiometry scan of the lumbar spine, a standardized posterior/anterior and lateral X-ray of the thoracic and lumbar spine, and an assessment of potential risk factors for osteoporosis., Results: Thirty-nine asymptomatic fractures were seen in 25 of 179 steroid-free patients (14.0%; 27 wedge, 12 concavity), and 17 fractures were seen in 13 of 89 steroid-dependent patients (14.6%; 14 wedge, three concavity). The prevalence of fractures in steroid-naive patients was 12.4%. The average bone mineral density, expressed as the T-score, of patients with fractures was not significantly different from that of those without fractures (-0.759 vs. -0.837; P=0.73); 55% of patients with fractures had a normal T-score. The bone mineral density was negatively correlated with lifetime steroids, but not with previous bowel resection or current disease activity. The fracture rate was not correlated with the bone mineral density (P=0.73) or lifetime steroid dose (P=0.83); in women, but not in men, the fracture rate was correlated with age (P=0.009)., Conclusions: The lack of correlation between the prevalence of fractures on the one hand and the bone mineral density and lifetime steroid dose on the other necessitates new hypotheses for the pathogenesis of the former.

In population-based studies of osteoporosis, ascertainment of fractures is typically based on self-report, with subsequent verification by medical records. The aim of this analysis was to assess the validity of self-report of incident nonspine fractures using a postal questionnaire. The degree of overreporting of fracture (false positives) was assessed by comparing self-reports of new fracture from respondents in the multicenter European Prospective Osteoporosis Study with data from other sources including radiographs and medical records. In the analysis, 563 subjects reported nonspine fractures. Verification of the presence of fracture was possible in 510 subjects. Of these, fractures were not confirmed in 11% (false positives). The percentage of false positives was greater in men than in women (15% vs 9%, p = 0.04), and less for fractures of the distal forearm and hip than for fractures at other sites. In a separate study, the degree of underreporting (false negatives) was assessed by follow-up of 251 individuals with confirmed fracture ascertained from the records of fracture clinics in three European centers (Lubeck, Oviedo, Warsaw). Questionnaire responses were received from 174 (69%) subjects. Of these, 12 (7%) did not recall sustaining a fracture (false negatives). The percentage of false negatives was lower for hip and distal forearm fractures with only 3 of 90 (3%) such fractures not recalled. Using the combined data from both studies, of those who reported a 'date' of fracture on the questionnaire, 91% of subjects were correct to within 1 month of the actual date of the fracture. A postal questionnaire is a relatively simple and accurate method for obtaining information about the occurrence of hip and distal forearm fractures, including their timing. Accuracy of ascertainment of fractures at other sites is less good and where possible self-reported fractures at such sites should be verified from other sources.

The aims of this study were to quantify the hospital burden of vertebral fracture in Europe and to compare this with that of hip fracture. Information on hospital discharges was sought by age and sex from Ministries of Health in Europe. Discharge rates for vertebral fracture, available from 12 countries, varied by more than 4-fold between countries, which was greater than the differences between sexes. Where the discharge rate was high for vertebral fracture the incidence of hip fracture was also high. Since nearly all cases of hip fracture are hospitalized, this suggests a relationship between hip and vertebral fracture risk that is not explained by different admission policies for vertebral fractures European countries.