1. Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients With Anticoagulation Failure vs Anticoagulation Contraindication.
- Author
-
Aarnink EW, Maarse M, Fierro N, Mazzone P, Beneduce A, Tondo C, Gasperetti A, Pracon R, Demkow M, Zieliński K, de Backer O, Korsholm K, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Estévez-Loureiro R, Caneiro-Queija B, Benito-González T, Pérez de Prado A, Nombela-Franco L, Salinas P, Holmes D, Almakadma AH, Berti S, Romeo MR, Millan X, Arzamendi D, Alla VM, Agarwal H, Eitel I, Paitazoglou C, Freixa X, Cepas-Guillén P, Chothia R, Badejoko SO, Spoon DB, Maddux JT, El-Chami M, Ram P, Branca L, Adamo M, Suradi HS, Peper J, van Dijk VF, Rensing BJWM, Swaans MJ, Vireca E, Bergmann MW, and Boersma LVA
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Aged, Risk Factors, Risk Assessment, Aged, 80 and over, Time Factors, Administration, Oral, Treatment Failure, Hemorrhage chemically induced, Recurrence, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Europe, Atrial Appendage physiopathology, Atrial Appendage diagnostic imaging, Atrial Fibrillation diagnosis, Atrial Fibrillation complications, Atrial Fibrillation mortality, Atrial Fibrillation drug therapy, Atrial Fibrillation therapy, Anticoagulants adverse effects, Anticoagulants administration & dosage, Contraindications, Drug, Registries, Ischemic Stroke prevention & control, Ischemic Stroke mortality, Ischemic Stroke diagnosis, Ischemic Stroke etiology, Cardiac Catheterization adverse effects, Cardiac Catheterization instrumentation, Cardiac Catheterization mortality
- Abstract
Background: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) provides mechanical cardioembolic protection for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients who cannot use oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT). Patients with a thrombotic event despite OAT are at high risk for recurrence and may also benefit from LAAO., Objectives: This study sought to investigate the efficacy of LAAO in AF patients with a thrombotic event on OAT compared to: 1) LAAO in AF patients with a contraindication for OAT; and 2) historical data., Methods: The international LAAO after stroke despite oral anticoagulation (STR-OAC LAAO) collaboration included patients who underwent LAAO because of thrombotic events on OAT. This cohort underwent propensity score matching and was compared to the EWOLUTION (Evaluating Real-Life Clinical Outcomes in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Receiving the WATCHMAN Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology) registry, which represents patients who underwent LAAO because of OAT contraindications. The primary outcome was ischemic stroke. Event rates were compared between cohorts and with historical data without OAT, yielding relative risk reductions based on risk scores., Results: Analysis of 438 matched pairs revealed no significant difference in the ischemic stroke rate between the STR-OAC LAAO and EWOLUTION cohorts (2.5% vs 1.9%; HR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.72-2.61). STR-OAC LAAO patients exhibited a higher thromboembolic risk (HR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.04-2.83) but lower bleeding risk (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.18-0.88) compared to EWOLUTION patients. The mortality rate was slightly higher in EWOLUTION (4.3% vs 6.9%; log-rank P = 0.028). Relative risk reductions for ischemic stroke were 70% and 78% in STR-OAC LAAO and EWOLUTION, respectively, compared to historical data without OAT., Conclusions: LAAO in patients with a thrombotic event on OAT demonstrated comparable stroke rates to the OAT contraindicated population in EWOLUTION. The thromboembolic event rate was higher and the bleeding rate lower, reflecting the intrinsically different risk profile of both populations. Until randomized trials are available, LAAO may be considered in patients with an ischemic event on OAT., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Maarse has received an educational grant from Boston Scientific. Dr Tondo serves on the advisory board of Boston Scientific; and has received lecture and tutoring fees from Boston Scientific and Abbott Medical. Dr Demkow has received proctoring fees from Boston Scientific and Abbott. Dr de Backer has received institutional research grants and consulting fees from Abbott and Boston Scientific. Dr Nielsen-Kudsk has received grants from Abbott and Boston Scientific. Dr Estevez-Loureiro is a proctor for Abbott Vascular, Boston Scientific, and Lifetech. Dr de Prado is a proctor for Boston Scientific. Dr Nombela-Franco is a proctor for Abbott Vascular, Edwards Lifesciences, and Boston Scientific. Dr Salinas is a proctor for Abbott Vascular. Dr Berti is a proctor for Edwards Lifesciences, Boston Scientific, and Abbott. Dr Millan has received consultant fees/honoraria from Abbott Laboratories and Boston Scientific. Dr Arzamendi has received consultant fees/honoraria from Abbott Laboratories and Boston Scientific. Dr Agarwal is a member of the Speaker Bureau and proctor for Medtronics, Abbott, Edwards Lifesciences, and Boston Scientific. Dr Spoon is a speaker for Medtronic, Abiomed, and Abbott. Dr El-Chami is a consultant for Medtronic and Boston Scientific. Dr Adamo has received speaker honoraria from Abbott Structural Heart. Dr van Dijk is a proctor for Boston Scientific. Dr Swaans is a proctor/lecturer for Abbott Vacular, Bioventrix Inc, Boston Scientific, Cardiac Dimensions, Edwards Lifesciences, GE Healthcare, and Philips Healthcare. Dr Vireca is an employee of Boston Scientific. Dr Bergmann has received speaker honoraria from Boston Scientific and Abbott; and has received research support from Boston Scientific and Abbott. Dr Boersma is a consultant for Boston Scientific; and is a proctor for Abbott. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF