1. Timing and delay of radical prostatectomy do not lead to adverse oncologic outcomes: results from a large European cohort at the times of COVID-19 pandemic.
- Author
-
Diamand R, Ploussard G, Roumiguié M, Oderda M, Benamran D, Fiard G, Peltier A, Simone G, Van Damme J, Malavaud B, Iselin C, Descotes JL, Roche JB, Quackels T, Roumeguère T, and Albisinni S
- Subjects
- Aged, Europe epidemiology, Humans, Infection Control methods, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Male, Neoplasm Grading, Neoplasm Staging, Organizational Innovation, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Risk Assessment methods, Risk Assessment statistics & numerical data, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 epidemiology, COVID-19 prevention & control, Oncology Service, Hospital statistics & numerical data, Oncology Service, Hospital trends, Prostatectomy methods, Prostatectomy statistics & numerical data, Prostatic Neoplasms epidemiology, Prostatic Neoplasms pathology, Prostatic Neoplasms surgery, Time-to-Treatment standards, Time-to-Treatment statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Purpose: The current COVID-19 pandemic is transforming our urologic practice and most urologic societies recommend to defer any surgical treatment for prostate cancer (PCa) patients. It is unclear whether a delay between diagnosis and surgical management (i.e., surgical delay) may have a detrimental effect on oncologic outcomes of PCa patients. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of surgical delay on oncologic outcomes., Methods: Data of 926 men undergoing radical prostatectomy across Europe for intermediate and high-risk PCa according to EAU classification were identified. Multivariable analysis using binary logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard model tested association between surgical delay and upgrading on final pathology, lymph-node invasion (LNI), pathological locally advanced disease (pT3-4 and/or pN1), need for adjuvant therapy, and biochemical recurrence. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate BCR-free survival after surgery as a function of surgical delay using a 3 month cut-off., Results: Median follow-up and surgical delay were 26 months (IQR 10-40) and 3 months (IQR 2-5), respectively. We did not find any significant association between surgical delay and oncologic outcomes when adjusted to pre- and post-operative variables. The lack of such association was observed across EAU risk categories., Conclusion: Delay of several months did not appear to adversely impact oncologic results for intermediate and high-risk PCa, and support an attitude of deferring surgery in line with the current recommendation of urologic societies.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF