Search

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the routine pre-natal surveillance carried out in nine European Gyneco-Obstetric units., Material and Method: A survey was carried out between October 1992 and November 1993 with the aid of a questionnaire. The questionnaire contained 118 questions covering clinical examinations and explorations undertaken systematically during the first, second and third trimesters and at the end of pregnancy before delivery. To ensure that the replies were accurate, the survey was carried out on the spot in the units concerned with the head of the unit., Results: The survey revealed a certain number of differences in the surveillance carried out in the various units. The units did not all carry out systematic blood tests for toxoplasmosis, AIDS and hepatitis B at the first examination. The same applied to fasting blood glucose and the bacterial culture of the urine. Nor did all the units automatically undertake vaginal examination during the second and third trimesters and the English departments were not all convinced of the need for systematic ultrasound tests. Only five of the nine units undertook routinely cardiotocographic recordings of the fetal heart rate at the end of the pregnancy., Conclusion: The differences observed in the various surveillance procedures simply reflect our uncertainty regarding the different tests we use to monitor pregnancies. At a time when financial constraints are forcing us to make choices, there is an urgent need to assess the effectiveness and the cost of the various elements of our prenatal monitoring.