Search

Aim: To determine the degree of variation in the handling of prostate needle biopsies (PBNx) in laboratories across Europe., Methods: A web based survey was emailed to members of the European Network of Uropathology and the British Association of Urological Pathologists., Results: Responses were received from 241 laboratories in 15 countries. PNBx were generally taken by urologists (93.8%) or radiologists (23.7%) but in 8.7% were also taken by non-medical personnel such as radiographers, nurses or biomedical assistants. Of the responding laboratories, 40.8% received cores in separate containers, 42.3% processed one core/block, 54.2% examined three levels/block, 49.4% examined one H&E section/level and 56.1% retained spare sections for potential immunohistochemistry. Of the laboratories, 40.9% retained unstained spares for over a year while 36.2% discarded spares within 1 month of reporting. Only two (0.8%) respondents routinely performed immunohistochemistry on all PNBx. There were differences in laboratory practice between the UK and the rest of Europe (RE). Procurement of PNBx by non-medical personnel was more common in the UK. RE laboratories more commonly received each core in a separate container, processed one core/block, examined fewer levels/block and examined more H&E sections/level. RE laboratories also retained spares for potential immunohistochemistry less often and for shorter periods. Use of p63 as the sole basal cell marker was more common in RE., Conclusions: There are marked differences in procurement, handling and processing of PNBx in laboratories across Europe. This data can help the development of best practice guidelines.

Purpose: Quality assurance of MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB)., Method: A consensus was achieved based on the existing literature and experience of an interdisciplinary group comprising European specialists in breast imaging and VAB., Results: Full imaging work-up must be completed according to existing standards before an indication for MR-guided VAB is established. The procedure should be reserved for lesions demonstrable by MRI alone. Acquisition of >24 cores (11-Gauge) should be routinely attempted, with the intention of sufficiently removing small lesions for accurate diagnosis. Following biopsy the patient should be re-imaged to demonstrate the biopsy site and its proximity to the lesion and hence the likely accuracy of the sampling. All patients should be discussed in a regular interdisciplinary conference and a documented consensus reached regarding patient management. Regular audit and review of all MR-guided VAB results and subsequent follow-up are recommended., Conclusion: This consensus includes protocols for the indication, performance parameters, interdisciplinary interpretation therapeutic recommendation, documentation and follow-up of MR-guided VAB. It does not replace official recommendations for percutaneous biopsy.

The aim of the breast team is to obtain a definitive, nonoperative diagnosis of all potential breast abnormalities in a timely and cost-effective way. Percutaneous needle biopsy with its high sensitivity and specificity should now be standard practice, removing the need for open surgical biopsy or frozen section. For patients with cancer, needle biopsy provides a cost-effective and rapid way of providing not only a definitive diagnosis but prognostic information, allowing prompt discussion of treatment options, be they surgical or medical. Early removal of uncertainty also allows better psychosocial adjustment to the disease. Patients with benign conditions found either by themselves or as a result of population or opportunistic screening can be promptly reassured and discharged, removing the health care and psychological costs of surgical biopsy or repeated follow-up. Radiologists involved in breast imaging should ensure that they have the necessary skills to carry out core biopsy and/or fine-needle aspiration (FNA) under all forms of image guidance. This paper provides guidelines on best practice for diagnostic interventional breast procedures and standards, against which all practitioners should audit themselves, from the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Objective: To assess the consistency of grading outcome among seven of eight participating centres of the European Randomised Screening Program of Prostate Cancer (ERSPC), a multicentre randomized trial intended to detect a difference in prostate cancer-related mortality between screened participants and a control group. Currently, tumour stage and grade in prostatectomy specimens represent the most predictive variables for biological behaviour. In prostate needle biopsies the tumour grade is a strong factor for deciding therapy., Patients and Methods: Within the ERSPC all prostate cancers detected in needle biopsies were graded according to the Gleason score system. Gleason scores were compressed in three categories of < or = 6, 7 and 8-10. Data for grading outcome were obtained from the databases from seven individual centres; in one centre the slide sets with cancer were separately reviewed., Results: Combining the data of seven ERSPC centres 66% of cancers detected in the screening arm were Gleason score < or = 6 and 92% were < or = 7. Gleason score 8-10 cancers varied from 2 to 11%. This variation in Gleason scores may be attributed to differences in the population characteristics and biopsy indications., Conclusions: These data indicate that in the seven ERSPC centres most screen-detected cancers have favourable characteristics on biopsy. Men with these cancers are amenable for treatment with curative intent. The observed differences in Gleason score distribution in different centres may partly be attributed to geographical differences and differences in the age range of the screened populations.

We present the results of transrectal thin needle aspiration biopsy of the prostate in 133 patients. Test specificity was 94 per cent and sensitivity also appeared to be high initially. However, with repeated rectal examinations and biopsies during an 11-year period a number of additional false negatives became apparent, which resulted in an apparent test sensitivity of 82 per cent, lower than most previously published reports. Our data suggest that aspiration biopsy has specificity and sensitivity similar to core biopsy, it is important to re-test patients who have a palpable abnormality and an initially benign biopsy, and aspiration biopsy simplicity allows for a low threshold of suspicion of subtle abnormalities and for repeating biopsies after negative findings.