1. Acute LDL-C reduction post ACS: strike early and strike strong: from evidence to clinical practice. A clinical consensus statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care (ACVC), in collaboration with the European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) and the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy.
- Author
-
Krychtiuk KA, Ahrens I, Drexel H, Halvorsen S, Hassager C, Huber K, Kurpas D, Niessner A, Schiele F, Semb AG, Sionis A, Claeys MJ, Barrabes J, Montero S, Sinnaeve P, Pedretti R, and Catapano A
- Subjects
- Humans, Cholesterol, LDL, Proprotein Convertase 9 therapeutic use, Europe, Acute Coronary Syndrome therapy, Cardiology, Dyslipidemias drug therapy, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors therapeutic use
- Abstract
After experiencing an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), patients are at a high risk of suffering from recurrent ischaemic cardiovascular events, especially in the very early phase. Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) is causally involved in atherosclerosis and a clear, monotonic relationship between pharmacologic LDL-C lowering and a reduction in cardiovascular events post-ACS has been shown, a concept termed 'the lower, the better'. Current ESC guidelines suggest an LDL-C guided, step-wise initiation and escalation of lipid-lowering therapy (LLT). Observational studies consistently show low rates of guideline-recommended LLT adaptions and concomitant low rates of LDL-C target goal achievement, leaving patients at residual risk, especially in the vulnerable post-ACS phase. In addition to the well-established 'the lower, the better' approach, a 'strike early and strike strong' approach in the early post-ACS phase with upfront initiation of a combined lipid-lowering approach using high-intensity statins and ezetimibe seems reasonable. We discuss the rationale, clinical trial evidence and experience for such an approach and highlight existing knowledge gaps. In addition, the concept of acute initiation of PCSK9 inhibition in the early phase is reviewed. Ultimately, we focus on hurdles and solutions to provide high-quality, evidence-based follow-up care in post-ACS patients., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: K.A.K. was a member of the advisory boards at Novartis, Sanofi, and Amgen and received speaker fees from Amgen. S. H. received speaker honoraria from Sanofi and Novartis. C.H. is Chair of the Danish Heart Foundation and received grants from the Danish Heart Foundation, Lundbaek foundation and NNF. K. H. received consultant and lecture fees for AstraZeneca, Amgen, Novartis and Sanofi Aventis. F.S. received speaker honoraria fees from Amgen, Bayer, Novartis, Novonordisk, Organon, Servier, Recordati and Sanofi and consulting fees from Amgen, Bayer, Servier and Sanofi. A.G.S. has received speaker honoraria and/or consulting fees from AbbVie, Bayer, Eli Lilly, Novartis Amgen, Pfizer and Sanofi. A.S. received speaker honoraria from Bayer, Daiichi-Sankyo, Ferrer, Pfizer, Sanofi, Servier and consulting fees from Sanofi. M.J.C. received Consulting & speakers' fees from Amgen, Sanofi, Novartis and Bayer. J.A.B. has received funding for Educational activities from AstraZeneca, NovoNordisk and Sanofi. P. S. received Consulting & speakers' fees from Amgen, Sanofi, Pfizer and BMS. A.C. received honoraria and lecture fees from Sigma-Tau, Manarini, Kowa, Recordati, Eli Lilly, Astrazeneca, Mediolanum, Pfizer, Merck, Sanofi, Aegerion, Amgen, Genzyme, Bayer, Sanofi, Regeneron and Daiichi-Sankyo. The other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF