Search

Aims: The aim of this study is to compare the SUPRAFLEX sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) with the XIENCE everolimus-eluting stent (EES) with respect to target lesion failure (TLF) at 12 months in a non-inferiority trial in a "real-world" patient population., Methods and Results: This is a prospective, randomised, 1:1 balanced, controlled, single-blind, multicentre study comparing clinical outcomes at 12 months between SUPRAFLEX and XIENCE in an "all-comers" patient population, comprising a total of 1,430 enrolled subjects with symptomatic coronary artery disease who qualify for percutaneous coronary interventions at 23 centres in Europe. The primary endpoint is a non-inferiority comparison of the device-oriented composite endpoint target lesion failure (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction and clinically indicated target lesion revascularisation) of the SUPRAFLEX group to the XIENCE group at 12 months post procedure. Secondary endpoints include the patient-oriented composite endpoint, target vessel failure, mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularisation and stent thrombosis rates (ARC classification)., Conclusions: The TALENT trial aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of the thin-strut SUPRAFLEX compared to the current standard of care (XIENCE EES) in patients with atherosclerotic lesions. This will provide valuable information on the impact of this thin-strut device in an all-comers population.

Background: ACEF score has been shown to have predictive ability in the patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The ACEF II score has recently been developed to predict short-term mortality after cardiac surgery. We compared the predictive ability of the ACEF and ACEF II scores to predict mortality after PCI in the all-comers population., Methods: The ACEF and ACEF II scores were calculated in 15,968 patients enrolled in the GLOBAL LEADERS study. Discrimination and calibration were assessed for outcomes after PCI. Recalibration of the regression model by updating the intercept and slope were performed to adjust the original ACEF model to the PCI setting. In a stratified approach, patients were divided into quintiles according to the score. Outcomes were compared between quintiles., Results: The ACEF and ACEF II score were available in 14,941 and 14,355 patients respectively. Discrimination for 30-day all-cause mortality was acceptable for both scores (C-statistic ACEF 0.75 and ACEF II 0.77). For 2-year all-cause mortality, the discrimination of ACEF score was acceptable (C-statistic 0.72) while the discrimination of ACEF II score was moderate (C-statistic 0.69). Both scores identified patients at high risk of mortality but overestimated all-cause mortality at 30 days in all quintiles. After recalibration, agreement between predicted and observed 30-day all-cause mortality in both scores are close to the identity line., Conclusions: The ACEF II model did not improve the predictive ability of the ACEF score. Recalibrated ACEF model can be used to estimated all-cause mortality rate at 30 days after PCI., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Durable polymer drug-eluting stents (DP-DES) may contribute to persistent inflammation, delayed endothelial healing and subsequent late DES thrombosis. The aim of this optical coherence tomography (OCT) substudy was to compare healing and neointimal coverage of a novel bioabsorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (Firehawk®) (BP-DES) versus the DP-DES (XIENCE) at 90 days in an all-comers patient population., Methods and Results: The TARGET All Comers study is a prospective multicentre randomised post-market trial of 1,656 patients randomised 1:1 to Firehawk or XIENCE at 21 centres in 10 European countries. The TARGET OCT substudy enrolled 36 consecutive patients with 52 lesions at six centres proficient in OCT. Follow-up OCT was performed at three months or prior to revascularisation when occurring before the three-month window. The substudy was designed for non-inferiority of the primary endpoint of neointimal thickness. At follow-up, the mean neointimal thickness by OCT (52 lesions: Firehawk, n=24; XIENCE, n=28), was not significantly different between groups (Firehawk 75.5 μm vs. XIENCE V 82.3 μm) meeting the primary endpoint of non-inferiority (pnoninferiority<0.001). The percentage of stent strut coverage was high in both groups (strut level: 99.9±0.3% vs. 100±0.1%, p=0.26), and the proportion of malapposed struts (1.0±1.6% vs. 1.2±2.0%, p=0.51) was low in both groups., Conclusions: Based on OCT, the Firehawk BP-DES has a similar healing response three months after implantation compared to the DP-DES, with near complete strut coverage, moderate neointima formation and minimal strut malapposition.