Search

Objective. To ascertain whether AS-associated polymorphisms of ERAP1, IL23R and IL12B genes associate with subphenotypes of PsA, particularly axial radiographic disease once stratified by HLA-B27 and HLA-Cw*0602 status.Methods. rs30187 (ERAP1 gene), rs6887695 (IL12B gene), rs11209026 and rs7530511 (IL23R gene) single nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped in 263 PsA cases from a prospective cohort and compared with data from healthy controls (n = 3266–5422). ERAP1 results were stratified according to HLA-B27 and HLA-Cw*0602 status. Investigation of association with age at onset of psoriasis/PsA, arthritic joint count, axial radiographic disease, peripheral radiographic erosions, Psoriasis Area Severity Index, nail score and HAQ was made.Results. There was a strong association between rs6887595 (IL12B) and PsA, with homozygosity for the major allele being more frequent in PsA than controls (odds ratio 1.70; 95% CI 1.3, 2.2; P < 0.001). A trend was demonstrated for the minor allele of rs11209026 (IL23R) to be less frequent in patients with erosive joint disease than in those without erosions or controls (7%, 14% and 12%, respectively). None of the polymorphisms associated with the presence of axial radiographic disease or other clinical parameters.Conclusion. We have confirmed a strong association between rs6887595 (IL12B) and PsA. A trend has been demonstrated between an IL23R variant and peripheral erosive disease. ERAP1 was not associated with axial radiographic disease in PsA. Spinal involvement in PsA may be genetically different from that in AS, which is in keeping with previous observations that the clinical and radiographic pattern of axial disease also differs. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Objective: Many clinically extremely vulnerable rheumatology patients have only recently ceased shielding from COVID-19, while some continue to minimise in-person contact. The objective of this study was to understand the impact of shielding and associated support needs in patients with rheumatic conditions and to understand how rheumatology teams can meet these needs both currently and in future pandemics., Design, Participants and Setting: The study was conducted in the Southwest of England using a case-study design. The participants were 15 patients with rheumatic conditions who were advised to shield and/or chose to shield at any time during the COVID-19 pandemic., Methods: Qualitative data collected via telephone and online semi-structured interviews and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis., Results: Fifteen interviews were conducted. Three main themes represent the data:'Just shove them over there in the corner' captures changes in patients' self-perception. They felt different to most other people, vulnerable and left behind. The initial sense of shock was followed by a sense of loss as changes became long term.'A long and lonely road' captures patients' psychological isolation due to a perceived lack of understanding and support. This included having to prove their health status and justify their shielding behaviours, which impacted their relationships. At times, they felt abandoned by their healthcare providers.'You can't just flip a switch' captures the difficulty of getting back to pre-pandemic normal after shielding. Patients did not recognise themselves physically and mentally. They wanted to collaborate with health professionals and identified the need for specific guidance to support their recovery., Conclusion: Patients are dealing with lasting physical and mental effects from shielding and consequences of delayed healthcare. Health professionals need time and resources to ask about patients' well-being, identify their health needs and refer/signpost to appropriate sources of support., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)