Search

Responding to aggressive behaviour is a key activity for nurses and other care staff in high secure hospitals. The attitudes and beliefs of staff regarding patient aggression will influence the management strategies they adopt. Patients will also hold attitudes regarding the causes of and best ways to respond to aggressive behaviour. This study measured the attitudes towards aggression of staff (n = 109) and patients (n = 27) in a high secure hospital in the UK using the Management of Aggression and Violence Attitude Scale (MAVAS). There was considerable concordance of views, staff and patients disagreeing on only two items on the MAVAS. Aggression was felt to have a range of causes, embracing factors internal to the person, factors in the external environment and situational or interactional factors. Interpersonal means of managing aggression were supported, but both staff and patients also advocated the use of controlling management strategies such as medication, seclusion and restraint. The implications of these findings for aggression management in high secure settings are discussed in the light of best practice guidelines that promote interpersonal approaches over controlling strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Staff and relative perspectives on patient aggression in dementia care units are seriously under researched in the U.K. Any work that has been conducted has relied upon quantitative studies. Qualitative research on aggression management in older peoples services are rare. In-depth views that can offer insights into causation and management strategies are therefore under represented in the literature. In order to investigate this issue further we interviewed a number of nursing staff and relatives in four U.K. care homes in the North West of England. Using a combined approach of one-to-one interviews (for staff) and focus groups (for relatives) we explored their views as to the reasons for and ways of responding to aggressive behaviour. This was part of a larger study reported upon elsewhere. Using thematic analysis we found similar results from both staff and relatives and as such their views were categorized into two broad areas: causation and management. In regards to causation we noted three sub-themes; internal, external and interpersonal factors which are further subdivided in the paper and for management two broad categories: the compassionate approach and 'don't go in strong'. The results indicated that staff in the participating units embraced a person-centred approach to aggression management. They predominantly respond to aggressive incidents with interpersonal strategies, such as distraction as opposed to medication or restraint. Overall they adopt a person centre approach to patient care. Relatives were clear in their perceptions of aggression as an interpersonal challenge, which is compounded or mediated by the illness of dementia. Consequently they were positive in their views of staff using non-coercive interventions. While the results of this and our earlier study are promising suggesting a less invasive approach to this aspect of dementia care, given the limitations of a small sample, more research of a similar nature is warranted. Findings from multidimensional studies can then provide a sounder basis for health and social care education, and person centred informed practice to reduce the incidence of aggression through preventative strategies., (© 2012 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

This paper reports on the first national UK survey of higher education provision related to dementia care. A questionnaire was distributed to lecturers in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in England and Wales seeking information about the amount of coverage of dementia within their pre-registration and pre-qualifying courses for health and social care professionals, and continuing professional development (CPD) courses on dementia care. Information was sought regarding the content of courses, and their relation to a published "dementia curriculum" [Pulsford et al., The contribution of higher education to dementia care, Journal of Dementia Care 11(4) (2003) 27-29]. Results show that coverage of dementia within the mental health branch of pre-registration nursing programmes is very variable, and may be related to the presence of an experienced and committed lecturer within the HEI. Coverage of dementia on adult branch programmes is limited, and sometimes non-existent, despite reported deficits in the ability of general nurses to work effectively with people with dementia. Occupational Therapists and Social Workers receive similar input to adult branch nurses. CPD courses are provided by around 70% of HEIs overall, but there is a shortage of specialised diploma and degree level courses on dementia care. Most areas of the dementia curriculum are covered in both pre-registration and CPD courses, but culture and diversity, young onset dementia, and physical health care may be less well addressed. Recommendations are made for developing higher education provision for professionals working with this group of people.

This paper reports on a survey of practitioners who act as mentors to student nurses from a Higher Education Institution in Northern England. The aims of the survey were to gain a profile of mentors, and to seek their views regarding their degree of support in undertaking the mentoring role, and their experience of mentors' update sessions. Respondents were experienced as mentors. As a group, they felt supported by their work colleagues, but fewer felt that they had adequate support from the HEI or their managers. Respondents wanted more time for mentoring activities, closer links with the HEI before, during and after practice placements, and more user friendly assessment documentation. Respondents did not report difficulty in spending enough time working with students, although this is a frequent complaint of students. Mentors update sessions were often not attended, either through staff shortages, or through lack of information.