Search

Objective: To assess the impact of the temporary cessation of orthodontic services on patients undergoing treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic., Design: Two-phase multicentre service evaluation., Setting: Secondary care orthodontic departments in the South West of England., Materials and Methods: Phase 1 - Patient-Reported Experience Measure questionnaire (PREM). The questionnaire was distributed to patients who had undergone orthodontic treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic once services had resumed. Phase 2 - assessment of treatment outcomes, specifically with the Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) Index. A total of 280 PAR scores were obtained from a cohort of patients treated before and during the pandemic., Results: A total of 711 PREM questionnaires were completed. Participants generally felt relaxed when visiting secondary care settings, orthodontic departments and whilst wearing orthodontic appliances during the pandemic. Nearly 40% of participants were concerned that the pandemic would impact on their treatment, particularly treatment length. Treatment outcomes revealed that patients treated before and during the pandemic experienced percentage PAR score reductions of 83.9% and 80.6%, respectively. Patients receiving treatment during the pandemic experienced longer treatment durations of 126 days., Conclusion: During the pandemic, low levels of anxiety were reported with respect to receiving orthodontic treatment in secondary care settings. Irrespective of the pandemic, a high standard of orthodontic treatment was provided. However, patient concerns regarding treatment length were justified.

Introduction: This paper explores the impact of recruiting patients to a randomised controlled trial (RCT) at recruiting centres. This large multicentre RCT examining the efficacy of chewing gum compared to ibuprofen in the relief of orthodontic pain was carried out across nine recruiting centres., Method: The work diaries of clinicians and supporting staff at recruiting centres were analysed over a four-month period from September to December 2011. This quantified the amount of clinical and non-clinical time spent on research duties., Results: Over this time period 98 patients were recruited across seven trial sites. On average, patient recruitment had a direct clinical impact of 19 minutes per patient recruited. The time commitment on trial administration outside the clinical sessions was much higher, averaging at 110 minutes per patient recruited, giving the overall time spent on the trial 129 minutes per patient., Conclusions: This information will be valuable to lead researchers when calculating the full economic cost of a proposed clinical trial and therefore when applying for grant funding. It may also be valuable to clinicians and their managers when considering becoming a principle investigator (PI) in a RCT. Although the impact on clinical time was 19 minutes per patient recruited, there is a considerably higher (almost six times greater) time commitment in administration around the recruitment of patients.