Search

Introduction: We describe an example of simulation-based interprofessional continuing education, the multidisciplinary obstetric simulated emergency scenarios (MOSES) course, which was designed to enhance nontechnical skills among obstetric teams and, hence, improve patient safety. Participants' perceptions of MOSES courses, their learning, and the transfer of learning to clinical practice were examined. Methods: Participants included senior midwives, obstetricians, and obstetric anesthetists, including course faculty from 4 purposively selected delivery suites in England. Telephone or e-mail interviews with MOSES course participants and facilitators were conducted, and video-recorded debriefings that formed integral parts of this 1-day course were analyzed. Results: The team training was well received. Participants were able to check out assumptions and expectations of others and develop respect for different roles within the delivery suite (DS) team. Skillful facilitation of debriefing after each scenario was central to learning. Participants reported acquiring new knowledge or insights, particularly concerning the role of communication and leadership in crisis situations, and they rehearsed unfamiliar skills. Observing peers working in the simulations increased participants' learning by highlighting alternative strategies. The learning achieved by individuals and groups was noticeably dependent on their starting points. Some participants identified limited changes in their behavior in the workplace following the MOSES course. Mechanisms to manage the transfer of learning to the wider team were weakly developed, although 2 DS teams made changes to their regular update training. Discussion: Interprofessional, team-based simulations promote new learning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Concern exists that the transition from student to doctor is abrupt and stressful, and that new graduates lack both clinical skills and confidence. This paper explores the effect of a preparation programme on the confidence and skills of new graduates commencing their first clinical post. Fifty-three participants in two English hospitals undertook a two-week induction combining life support, emergency and clinical skills training with administrative induction and shadowing the outgoing house officer. Questionnaires and focus groups at the beginning, end, and one month following the programme explored participants' perceptions. Respondents were initially anxious about starting work, concerned mainly about clinical skills; taking responsibility; being alone; non-technical skills; and local geography and procedures. Confidence increased following the programme, and the programme's contents directly mitigated some fears. Shadowing was most highly valued, though experiences varied; acute emergency training was also valued, but clinical skills revision was more variably received. Having commenced work, these perceptions remained. Confidence increased further, but clinical practice still represented a steep learning curve. This programme to support the transition from medical student to practising doctor was useful and effective, but could be improved. Increasing responsibility during shadowing could effect an even smoother transition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper reports the findings from an evaluation of a pilot interprofessional training ward project for pre-qualification medical, nursing, occupational therapy and physiotherapy students. This initiative required sustained collaboration from staff based in two National Health Service (NHS) trusts and four schools in three universities. The ward was based on a model of interprofessional education developed in Sweden, but adapted in the light of this experience and also to meet the needs and aspirations of the training ward stakeholders in London. The training ward was evaluated using a multi-method design. Data were collected from all participants involved in this pilot: students, facilitators and patients. The findings from the evaluation are presented and discussed. This paper pays particular attention to the collaborative experiences of the students, staff and institutions involved in this initiative. In addition, 1-year follow-up data collected from the students who had, by then, qualified as clinical practitioners are reported. The paper presents conclusions from the evaluation, and comments on the training ward's strengths, limitations and future development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The need to underpin health and education with a firm evidence base is of increasing significance. Systematic review offers an effective approach to critically assessing research in order to understand its overall impact on practice. Based on 5 years' experience undertaking systematic reviews of interprofessional education, this paper offers guidance for researchers and practitioners about to embark upon systematic review work.