1. Incremental Value of Coronary Microcirculation Resistive Reserve Ratio in Predicting the Extent of Myocardial Infarction in Patients with STEMI. Insights from the Oxford Acute Myocardial Infarction (OxAMI) Study.
- Author
-
Scarsini R, De Maria GL, Borlotti A, Kotronias RA, Langrish JP, Lucking AJ, Choudhury RP, Ferreira VM, Ribichini F, Channon KM, Kharbanda RK, and Banning AP
- Subjects
- Aged, Coronary Angiography, England, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Predictive Value of Tests, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction pathology, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction physiopathology, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction therapy, Thermodilution, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Cardiac Catheterization, Coronary Circulation, Microcirculation, Myocardium pathology, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction diagnosis, Vascular Resistance
- Abstract
Background: Resistive reserve ratio (RRR) is a novel index that expresses the ratio between basal and hyperemic microcirculatory resistance. We sought to compare the performance of RRR, coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) in predicting the extent of infarct size (IS) after ST-elevation myocardial infarction., Methods: Thermodilution parameters were measured after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) in 45 patients. In 30 (67%) cases pre-stenting measurements were also performed to assess the effect of PPCI on myocardial reperfusion, defined by CFR. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed at 48-h to assess area-at-risk (AAR), microvascular obstruction (MVO) and IS. CMR was repeated at 6 months in 39/45 patients., Results: RRR (AUC
RRR = 0.85, CI: 0.71-0.99) performed better compared to CFR (AUCCFR = 0.67, CI: 0.48-0.86) and IMR (AUCIMR = 0.70, CI: 0.52-0.88) in predicting IS% at 6-months. Patients with impaired RRR showed larger acute-IS% (27.4 [14.5-42.5] vs 15.4 [8.3-26], p = 0.018), MVO% (3.44 [0-5.97] vs 0 [0-0.89], p = 0.026), AAR% (43 [35-52] vs 34 [25-46], p = 0.03) and 6-months-IS% (22.7 [10.2-35] vs 8.8 [6.9-12.3], p = 0.006), higher rate of adverse remodeling (22.2% vs 0%, p = 0.04) and lower myocardial salvage index (34% [22.8-59.2] vs 53.2% [37.7-71], p = 0.032) compared with other patients. Furthermore, RRR but not IMR or CFR resulted independently associated with 6-months-IS%. CFR (1.48 ± 0.87 vs 1.47 ± 0.61, p = 0.94) did not improve after PPCI in patients with impaired RRR, whereas it improved significantly in other patients (CFR: 1.37 ± 0.43 vs 1.93 ± 0.49, p = 0.018)., Conclusions: Patients with post-PPCI impaired RRR were more likely to have suboptimal myocardial reperfusion and larger IS at follow-up. RRR may offer incremental prognostic value compared with other thermodilution-derived indices., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF