Search

Discharge preparation is a multiprofessional activity that is not always conducted efficiently. Perspectives of staff provide an insight into challenges and solutions for this organizational process. The study aimed to examine current discharge practice in one hospital and to compare perceptions of this activity between healthcare workers from different professions. A questionnaire was sent to 1344 staff in an English hospital. It consisted of items related to discharge, which were rated on a Likert scale, and included space for free text. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The survey method has a number of limitations and conclusions must be considered with caution. A total of 455 usable questionnaires were returned from nurses/midwives, doctors and therapists/allied health professionals. Although respondents showed agreement on a number of areas, differences did arise, which could be linked, in part, to values and roles associated with specific healthcare disciplines. Tensions between professional groups were evident, especially between social workers, nurses and medics. Differences of opinion also appeared between practitioners, patients and carers. Different views among practitioners of discharge preparation could impede efficient joint working. Better understanding of the roles and expertise of team members might improve this process. Factors affecting discharge preparation need to be understood to reduce staff and consumer dissatisfaction and to avoid potential readmissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To understand the perspective of hospital-based health professionals with regard to preparing patients for discharge from an acute hospital in England., Background: The hospital experience in England over recent years is characterised by increasing admission rates and decreasing length of stay. Legislation and policy initiatives have also focussed upon the need to reduce delayed discharges. Discharge preparation is known to be a complex intervention with multiple obstacles within and outside of the hospital setting., Design: Qualitative., Methods: Posters were displayed within a hospital asking health professionals to take part in a focus group. Maximum variation, in terms of job titles, was sought for within the sample. Focus groups were held in December 2006. Six senior members of staff divided into pairs to run them. All groups were taped and transcribed verbatim and analysed using a framework approach., Results: Three focus groups were conducted, which involved 11 nurses, 15 allied health professionals, five social workers and one doctor. Analysis identified the following themes and sub themes: 1 Conflicting pressures on staff: Keeping patients in hospital vs. getting them out; Striving for flexibility within a system; A paucity of intermediary provision. 2 Casualties arising from conflicting pressures: Professionals losing their sense of professionalism; Patients being 'systematised'., Conclusions: Pressures described during focus groups stemmed from five main sources: external targets placed upon the system, internal hospital inflexibility and poor communication, the dominance of the medical model of care, a desire to address the complex needs of individuals and a lack of community services. Staff felt themselves to be victims of these competing pressures and that many of the solutions were beyond their influence. Staff described the dehumanising effect of sometimes having to ignore patient concerns, wishes and choices., Relevance to Clinical Practice: Understanding of the pressures surrounding discharge could inform relevant service improvements.