Search

Mutations in two loci encoding cell-cycle-regulatory proteins have been shown to cause familial malignant melanoma. About 20% of melanoma-prone families bear a mutation in the CDKN2A locus, which encodes two unrelated proteins, p16INK4A and p14ARF. Mutations in the other locus, CDK4, are much rarer and have been linked to the disease in only three families worldwide. In the 1960s, a large Norwegian pedigree with multiple atypical nevi and malignant melanomas was identified. Subsequently, six generations and more than 100 family members were traced and 20 cases of melanoma verified. In this article, we report that CDK4 codon 24 is mutated from CGT to CAT (Arg24His) in this unusually large melanoma kindred. Intriguingly, one of the family members had ocular melanoma, but the CDK4 mutation could not be detected in archival tissue samples from this subject. Thus, the case of ocular melanoma in this family was sporadic, suggesting an etiology different from that of the skin tumors. The CDK4 mutation in the Norwegian family was identical to that in melanoma families in France, Australia, and England. Haplotype analysis using microsatellite markers flanking the CDK4 gene and single-nucleotide polymorphisms within the gene did not support the possibility that there was a common founder, but rather indicated at least two independent mutational events. All CDK4 melanoma families known to date have a substitution of amino acid 24. In addition to resulting from selection pressure, this observation may be explained by the CG dinucleotide of codon 24 representing a mutational hot spot in the CDK4 gene., ((c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Background: Although patients from some families with the atypical mole syndrome (AMS) are predisposed to melanoma, it is not known how frequently this underlies the apparently sporadic presentation of melanoma., Objective: This study was designed to estimate the frequency of the AMS (dysplastic nevus or FAMMM syndrome) phenotype in a population-based study of patients with melanoma in the United Kingdom and to determine the prevalence of the phenotype in the relatives of the patients with AMS., Methods: The nevi of patients with melanoma and controls in a case-control study, and the nevi of some relatives of patients with AMS, were examined. An AMS scoring system was used to define the AMS phenotype. The familiarity of the AMS phenotype was then determined by screening first-degree relatives of persons with the AMS phenotype., Results: Forty of 266 (15%) of patients with melanoma had the AMS phenotype compared with 7 of 305 (2%) of the controls (odds ratio 7.5, 95% confidence interval 3.4-16.8). Screening of relatives of patients with melanoma who had the AMS phenotype identified the same phenotype within the families, providing evidence that the AMS phenotype in patients with melanoma is predictive of the same phenotype in relatives, consistent with so-called type D1 AMS., Conclusion: The AMS phenotype is a potent risk factor for cutaneous melanoma and is present in 15% of patients. Melanoma in the United Kingdom is more common in women than in men, but the AMS phenotype was more frequent in men in this study. It is our hypothesis that the effects of the putative AMS gene are diluted by environmental factors in U.K. women. Screening of relatives of patients with melanoma who have the AMS phenotype may identify persons at increased risk of melanoma.