Search

Aims and objectives: To gain in-depth knowledge of patients’ experiences of the consultation processes at a multidisciplinary atrial fibrillation outpatient clinic in a university hospital in Denmark. Background: Atrial fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia associated with morbidity and mortality if not diagnosed and treated as recommended. Patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation preferably should be managed in an outpatient setting which includes medical examination, patient education and decision-making on medical therapy. Design: This is a qualitative study of 14 patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation, ranging from asymptomatic patients, to those with mild to severe symptoms; they were all referred from general practitioners. Methods: Data were generated in 2013-2015 using participant observation during each consultation, followed by individual interviews postconsultation. Results: Patients were referred with limited information on AF and knowledge about the management consultation procedures. The consultations were performed in a professional way by the cardiologist as well as by the nurses with an emphasis on the medical aspects of atrial fibrillation. The understanding that atrial fibrillation is not a fatal disease in itself was very important for patients. At the same time, visiting the clinic was overwhelming, information was difficult to understand, and patients found it difficult to be involved in decision-making. Conclusions: This study indicates that patients were uncertain on what AF was before as well as after their consultation. The communication was concentrated on the medical aspects of atrial fibrillation and visiting the clinic was an overwhelming experience for the patients. They had difficulty understanding what atrial fibrillation was, why they were treated with anticoagulation, and that anticoagulating was a lifelong treatment. Relevance for clinical practice: This study demonstrates some lack of patient centred care and an absence of tailored patient AF-related education. Furthermore, the study highlights the need for and importance of active patient involvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Data on the association between quality of heart failure (HF) care and outcomes among patients with incident HF are sparse. We examined the association between process performance measures and clinical outcomes in patients with incident HF with reduced ejection fraction.Methods: Patients with incident HF with reduced ejection fraction (n=10 966) between January 2008 and October 2015 were identified from the Danish HF Registry. Data from public registries were linked. Multivariable regression analyses were used to assess the association between 6 guideline-recommended HF care processes (New York Heart Association assessment, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin II receptor blockers, beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, exercise training, and patient education) and all-cause and HF readmission, all-cause and HF hospital days, and mortality within 3 to 12 months after HF diagnosis. The associations were analyzed according to the percentages of all relevant performance measures fulfilled for the individual patient (0%-50% [reference group], >50%-75%, and >75%-100%) and for the individual performance measures.Results: Fulfilling >75% to 100% of the performance measures (n=5341 [48.7%]) was associated with lower risk of all-cause readmission (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.68-0.89]) and HF readmission (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.54-0.92]), lower use of all-cause hospital days (adjusted mean ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.70-0.76]) and HF hospital days (adjusted mean ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.70-0.89]), and lower mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.32-0.53]). A dose-response relationship was observed between fulfilling more performance measures and mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.49-0.77] fulfilling >50%-75% of the measures). Fulfilling individual performance measures, except mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapy, was associated with lower adjusted all-cause readmission, lower adjusted use of all-cause and HF hospital days, and lower adjusted mortality.Conclusions: Fulfilling more process performance measures was associated with better clinical outcomes in patients with incident HF with reduced ejection fraction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]