This poster presentation explores the cultural and racist assumptions implicit in the law facilitating U.S. occupation of the Naval Station at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba and detention on the base. It argues that U.S. law and its interpretation of international law carve a racialized space on the base. This is central to base creation during U.S. occupation of Cuba, 1898-1902, and to "War on Terror" base detention, which is reserved primarily to persons of color. The base is a product of the Platt Amendment (1901), making Cuba a U.S. protectorate, denying Cuba full sovereignty, and requiring a U.S. base in Cuban territory. Race, along with economic and geopolitical factors, justified these sovereignty limitations in U.S. law. Notions of Anglo superiority, and the inability to self-govern for "hispanic," black, and mixed-race population characterized U.S. relations with Cuba. Strategic objectives required Cuba lease the base under present non-sovereign terms. The policies reflect international law, which generally precluded non-European populations from attaining full sovereignty. Historic racial power in foreign relations and law created the base at Guantánamo. Recently, race colors base detention in the "War on Terror" in three ways. First, detention is primarily reserved to South and Central Asian, Middle-Eastern, or Arab identities. The total detention population (including those released) amounts to nearly 800 persons and includes 47 nationalities. An overwhelming number of detainees are citizens of Afghanistan, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen. Second, U.S. policies painting detainees as "jihadists" serve as proxies for Muslim detention. Third, the "unlawful enemy combatant" classification mimics historic identities of the "savage." Initially, detainees were not protected by Geneva conventions. Historically, "savages," "barbarians," and "natives" were excluded from similar international law protections. Race whether tied to nationality, religion, or neo-savagery, characterizes Guantánamo, illuminating critical commonalities in myriad nationalities. Despite diverse identities, being in Guantánamo's space imposes these commonalities. Foreign relations history created this racialized space. Detention makes it current. As a work-in-progress, this presentation correlates cultural studies and critical race theory with an analysis of legal jurisdiction on the base, historic and present. While President Barack Obama's recent executive order promises to end base detention by January 2010, legal precedent and foreign relations practices keep detention (along with "interrogation" practices and individual rights abuses) engrained in U.S. law. This presentation builds on an article providing a post-colonial analysis of detention jurisprudence, titled "Boumediene v. Bush and Guantánamo, Cuba: does the "Empire Strike Back"?" 61 SMU Law Rev. (2009) and is part of a long-term research project titled "Guantánamo, War on Terror, and Law's Imperial legacy: Examples in Race, Space, and Resources." This article is attached. ..PAT.-Unpublished Manuscript [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]