Search

STUDY QUESTION What is the temporal activity and the concentration in follicular fluid (FF) of the anti-inflammatory steroid cortisol during the ovulatory process in humans? SUMMARY ANSWER Intrafollicular concentrations of cortisol become massively upregulated close to ovulation concomitant with an exceptionally high biological activity securing a timely and efficient termination of inflammatory processes. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Ovulation has been described as a local, controlled inflammatory process resulting in the degeneration of the follicle wall which facilitate oocyte extrusion. Ovulation also affects the glucocorticoid metabolism of granulosa cells (GCs) and although de novo synthesis of cortisol only occurs in the adrenal cortex, the mid-cycle surge has been shown to induce a change from high expression of HSD11B2, inactivating cortisol to cortisone, to high expression of HSD11B1 which reversibly catalyses cortisol production from cortisone. Furthermore, high concentrations of progesterone and 17OH-progesterone within follicles may cause dislodging of cortisol from cortisol binding protein (CBP) thereby activating the biological activity of cortisol. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This prospective cohort study included 50 women undergoing fertility treatment according to a standard antagonist protocol at a university hospital-affiliated fertility clinic in Denmark. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Women donated FF and GCs from one follicle for research purpose aspirated at one of four time points during the process of final maturation of follicles: T  = 0 h, T  = 12 h, T  = 17 h, T  = 32 h. A second sample was collected at oocyte pick up at T  = 36 h. The concentration of cortisol and cortisone together with a range of sex steroids was measured by LC-MS/MS in FF collected at the five time points mentioned above. Whole genome microarray data, validated by q-PCR analysis, was used to evaluate gene expression of CYP11B1 , CYP21A2 , HSD11B1 , HSD11B2 , and NR3C1 in GCs at the same time points. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The concentration of cortisol was significantly increased from a few nM at 0 h to around 100–140 nM (P  ≤ 0.0001) at 32–36 h, whilst cortisone was almost constant from 0 to 17 h at a concentration of between 90 and 100 nM being significantly reduced to 25–40 nM (P  ≤ 0.0001) at 32–36 h. This was paralleled by a 690-fold upregulation of HSD11B1 from 0 to 12 h increasing to a more than 20.000-fold change at 36 h. HSD11B2 was quickly downregulated 15- to 20-fold after ovulation induction. Concentrations of progesterone and 17OH-progesterone increased during the ovulatory process to high levels which in essence displaces cortisol from its binding protein CBP due to similar binding affinities. Furthermore, a significant decrease in 11-deoxycortisol expression was seen, but CYP11B1 expression was below detection limit in GCs. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The study included women undergoing ovarian stimulation and results may differ from the natural cycle. More observations at each specific time point may have strengthened the conclusions. Furthermore, we have not been able to measure the actual active biological concentration of cortisol. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS For the first time, this study collectively evaluated the temporal pattern of cortisol and cortisone concentrations during human ovulation, rendering a physiological framework for understanding potential dysregulations in the inflammatory reaction of ovulation. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This research was supported by the University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, and Novo Nordisk Foundation grant number NNF21OC00700556. Interreg V ÔKS through ReproUnion (www.reprounion.eu); Region Zealand Research Foundation. The funders had no role in study design, collection of data, analyses, writing of the article, or the decision to submit it for publication. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

STUDY QUESTION Which substances and signal transduction pathways are potentially active downstream to the effect of FSH and LH in the regulation of human oocyte maturation in vivo ? SUMMARY ANSWER The regulation of human oocyte maturation appears to be a multifactorial process in which several different signal transduction pathways are active. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Many studies in animal species have provided insight into the mechanisms that govern the final maturation of oocytes. Currently, these studies have identified several different mechanisms downstream to the effects of FSH and LH. Some of the identified mechanisms include the regulation of cAMP/cGMP levels in oocytes involving C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP), effects of epidermal growth factor (EGF)-related peptides such as amphiregulin (AREG) and/or epiregulin (EREG), effect of TGF-β family members including growth differentiation factor 9 (GDF9) and morphogenetic protein 15 (BMP15), activins/inhibins, follicular fluid meiosis activating sterol (FF-MAS), the growth factor midkine (MDK), and several others. However, to what extent these pathways and mechanisms are active in humans in vivo is unknown. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This prospective cohort study included 50 women undergoing fertility treatment in a standard antagonist protocol at a university hospital affiliated fertility clinic in 2016–2018. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS We evaluated the substances and signalling pathways potentially affecting human oocyte maturation in follicular fluid (FF) and granulosa cells (GCs) collected at five time points during the final maturation of follicles. Using ELISA measurement and proteomic profiling of FF and whole genome gene expression in GC, the following substances and their signal transduction pathways were collectively evaluated: CNP, the EGF family, inhibin-A, inhibin-B, activins, FF-MAS, MDK, GDF9, and BMP15. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE All the evaluated substances and signal transduction pathways are potentially active in the regulation of human oocyte maturation in vivo except for GDF9/BMP15 signalling. In particular, AREG, inhibins, and MDK were significantly upregulated during the first 12–17 h after initiating the final maturation of follicles and were measured at significantly higher concentrations than previously reported. Additionally, the genes regulating FF-MAS synthesis and metabolism were significantly controlled in favour of accumulation during the first 12–17 h. In contrast, concentrations of CNP were low and did not change during the process of final maturation of follicles, and concentrations of GDF9 and BMP15 were much lower than reported in small antral follicles, suggesting a less pronounced influence from these substances. LARGE SCALE DATA None. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Although GC and cumulus cells have many similar features, it is a limitation of the current study that information for the corresponding cumulus cells is not available. However, we seldom recovered a cumulus–oocyte complex during the follicle aspiration from 0 to 32 h. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Delineating the mechanisms governing the regulation of human oocyte maturation in vivo advances the possibility of developing a platform for IVM that, as for most other mammalian species, results in healthy offspring with good efficacy. Mimicking the intrafollicular conditions during oocyte maturation in vivo in small culture droplets during IVM may enhance oocyte nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation. The primary outlook for such a method is, in the context of fertility preservation, to augment the chances of achieving biological children after a cancer treatment by subjecting oocytes from small antral follicles to IVM. Provided that aspiration of oocytes from small antral follicles in vivo can be developed with good efficacy, IVM may be applied to infertile patients on a larger scale and can provide a cheap alternative to conventional IVF treatment with ovarian stimulation. Successful IVM has the potential to change current established techniques for infertility treatment. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This research was supported by the University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, the Independent Research Fund Denmark (grant number 0134-00448), and the Interregional EU-sponsored ReproUnion network. There are no conflicts of interest to be declared. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]