Search

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with participation in group well-child care (GWCC), wherein families share preventive health care visits. METHODS: We extracted electronic health record data of mother-infant dyads with infants born 2013--18 at Yale New Haven Hospital and followed at the primary care center. Using chi-square analysis and multivariate logistic regression, we examined the extent to which 1) maternal/infant characteristics and recruitment timing were associated with GWCC initiation and continued engagement and 2) initiation was associated with primary care visits. RESULTS: Of 2046 eligible mother-infant dyads, 11.6% initiated GWCC. The odds of initiation were higher among mothers with Spanish versus English primary language (odds ratio: 2.36 [95% confidence interval: 1.52--3.66]), with 1 child versus ≥ 3 children (1.58 [1.13--2.22]), and of non- Hispanic Black versus non-Hispanic White infants (2.72 [1.39--5.32]). Initiation was lower among infants born in 2016 (0.53 [0.32--0.88]) and 2018 (0.29 [0.17--0.52]) versus 2013. Among GWCC initiators with follow-up data (n = 217), continued engagement (n = 132, 60.8%) was positively associated with maternal age of 20--29 years (2.85 [1.10--7.34]) and > 30 years (3.46 [1.15--10.43]) compared with < 20 years, and mothers with 1 child versus ≥ 3 (2.28 [1.04--4.98]). GWCC initiators, versus non-initiators, had 5.06 times higher adjusted odds of attending > 9 primary care appointments in the first 18 months (95% confidence interval: 3.74--6.85). CONCLUSIONS: As evidence builds on health and social benefits of GWCC, recruitment efforts may gain from considering multi-level socio-economic, demographic, and cultural factors associated with GWCC participation. Higher participation among systemically marginalized groups may present unique opportunities for family-based health promotion to mitigate health inequities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Few studies have explored the application of message framing to promote health behaviors in adolescents. In this exploratory study, we examined young adolescents' selection of gain- versus loss-framed images and messages when designing an HIV-prevention intervention to promote delayed sexual initiation. Twenty-six adolescents (aged 10-14 years) participated in six focus groups and created and discussed posters to persuade their peers to delay the initiation of sexual activity. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed. A five-person multidisciplinary team analyzed the posters and focus group transcripts using thematic analysis. The majority of the posters (18/26, 69%) contained both gain- and loss-framed content. Of the 93/170 (56%) images and messages with framing, similar proportions were gain- (48/93, 52%) and loss-framed (45/93, 48%). Most gain-framed content (23/48, 48%) focused on academic achievement, whereas loss-framed content focused on pregnancy (20/45, 44%) and HIV/AIDS (14/45, 31%). These preliminary data suggest that young adolescents may prefer a combination of gain- and loss-framing in health materials to promote reduction in sexual risk behaviors.

OBJECTIVE: Medical-Legal Partnerships (MLPs) integrate medical and legal care to address prevalent health-harming legal needs (HHLN) among socioeconomically marginalized populations. MLPs address a diverse array of social determinants of health (SDOH) and have been shown to positively impact children's health. Less is known, however, about how MLPs affect health care providers. MLPs may affect child health by changing clinical practice and provider behavior, and transforming providers" relationships with their patients and patients' families. Examining and understanding how MLPs affect providers is thus critical to elucidating how MLPs may ultimately impact child health. METHODS: We examined one pediatric MLP at an academic medical center in New Haven, Connecticut. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 pediatric providers who had engaged with the MLP and 20 parents/guardians who had interacted with the MLP. We analyzed the qualitative data using inductive coding, primarily drawing upon provider interviews. RESULTS: The MLP affected providers in five major ways. The MLP 1) improved provider awareness of SDOH and HHLN, 2) expanded provider perceptions of their role and responsibilities as clinicians, 3) improved provider efficacy in addressing SDOH and HHLN, 4) empowered providers to engage in systemic advocacy, and 5) improved providers' relationships with patients' families. CONCLUSION: Our study identifies multiple ways that a pediatric MLP affects providers. Our findings suggest that MLPs can improve patient and population health by equipping providers with the knowledge and tools needed to assist patients with HHLN and SDOH, improving provider-family relationships, and encouraging providers to engage in systemic and institutional advocacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]