Search

This article describes challenges and successes seen in the first four years of efforts the state of Connecticut has made to reorient its behavioral health system to promoting recovery. Beginning in 2000, the Connecticut initiative was conceptualized as a multi-year, systemic process that involved the following interrelated steps: a) developing core values and principles based on the input of people in recovery; b) establishing a conceptual and policy framework based on this vision; c) building workforce corn petencies and skills; d) changing programs and service structures; e) aligning fiscal and administrative policies; and, finally, t) monitoring, evaluating, and adjusting these efforts. Following descriptions of the first four steps, the authors offer a few lessons that might benefit other states engaged in similar processes of transformation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We characterized prescribing in Connecticut's State public mental health system to assess the feasibility of implementing an evidence-based medication algorithm. Medication records for a random sample of outpatients with diagnoses of schizophrenia spectrum disorders showed prescribing patterns similar to the entire United States. The base rate of changing antipsychotic medications was moderate. Over half of patients received decanoate medications, polypharmacy was nontrivial, and there was variability in prescribing patterns across physicians. Caucasian patients were more likely to receive an atypical antipsychotic and less likely to have a decanoate medication, and Latino patients were less likely to change medications. Because the base rate of changing medications was moderate and a considerable proportion of patients were prescribed newer antipsychotic medications, introducing a research-derived medication algorithm with newer atypical antipsychotics as first line agents may fit well with current practice. Further, implementing such an algorithm may reduce racial and ethnic disparities in prescribing patterns.