Search

Objective: Niraparib improved survival in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC) patients versus routine surveillance, accompanied by increased costs. Based on the NORA trial, we evaluated for the first time the costeffectiveness of maintenance niraparib with individualized starting dosage (ISD) in China. Methods: A Markov model was developed to simulate the costs and health outcomes of each strategy. The total costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were measured. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to estimate model robustness. Scenario analyses were also conducted. Results: Compared to routine surveillance, niraparib additionally increased QALYs by 0.59 and 0.30 in populations with and without germline BRCA (gBRCA) mutations, with incremental costs of $10,860.79 and $12,098.54, respectively. The ICERs of niraparib over routine surveillance were $18,653.67/QALY and $39,212.99/QALY. At a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $37,488/QALY, the ISD enhanced the likelihood of cost-effectiveness from 9.35% to 30.73% in the gBRCA-mutated group and from 0.77% to 11.74% in the non-gBRCA mutated population. The probability of niraparib being cost-effective in the region with the highest per capita Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in China was 74.23% and 76.10% in the gBRCA-mutated and non-gBRCA mutated population, respectively. Niraparib was 100% cost-effective for National Basic Medical Insurance beneficiaries under the above WTP thresholds. Conclusion: Compared to routine surveillance, the ISD of niraparib for maintenance treatment of PSROC is cost-effective in the gBRCA-mutated population and more effective but costly in the non-gBRCA mutated patients. The optimized niraparib price, economic status, and health insurance coverage may benefit the economic outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of niraparib versus routine surveillance as maintenance therapy for patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer in China. A three-state partitioned survival model that adopted a lifetime horizon with a 4-week cycle length was developed. Efficacy data were derived from the NORA study. Cost and utility data were obtained from published studies and online databases. The cost and health outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 5%. In this analysis, the primary outcomes included quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). The willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds were set at 1 to 3 times the gross domestic product per capita of China in 2022 ($12,741 to $38,233/QALY). Sensitivity analyses were conducted to verify the robustness of the model results. In the base-case analysis, niraparib was not found to be cost-effective, with an ICER of $42,888/QALY compared with routine surveillance at the WTP thresholds. One-way deterministic sensitivity analyses indicated that the ICER value was most sensitive to the cost of subsequent treatment in placebo group. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested that at the WTP thresholds, the probability of niraparib being cost-effective was 2.9% to 50.1%. Niraparib improves the survival benefit of platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer patients. However, it seems to be less cost-effective, as it has higher costs than routine surveillance at the WTP thresholds. Reasonable dose reduction according to the patient's actual situation or lowering the price of niraparib can improve its cost-effectiveness. • Limited economic evidence of niraparib for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer is provided in China. • Niraparib is less cost-effective than routine surveillance in China. • The cost-effectiveness of niraparib will be improved by lowing its price. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Maintenance therapy with the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) for platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian carcinoma (OC) have proven to be effective compared with placebo. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness (CE) of maintenance fuzuloparib compared to routine surveillance (RS), niraparib and olaparib for platinum-sensitive recurrent OC from the Chinese healthcare systems. Method: A partitioned survival model with three-state (progression-free, progressed, death) was constructed utilizing TreeAge Pro 2011 software to evaluate the economic value of fuzuloparib, niraparib and olaparib maintenance treatment for platinum-sensitive recurrent OC based on the clinical data derived from FZOCUS-2, ENGOT-OV16/NOVA and ENGOT-Ov21/SOLO2. Transition probabilities were estimated from the reported survival probabilities in those trials. Cost and health preference data were derived from the literature. The quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and lifetime costs were measured for this analysis. A 5 years horizon and 5%/year discount rates were used. One-way analysis, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were performed to explore the model uncertainties. Results: Total cost of fuzuloparib, niraparib and olaparib were $31628.10, $48183.48 and $54605.54, whereas they had an incremental cost-utility ratio of $31992.69, $32216.08 and $23359.26 per additional progression-free survival (PFS) QALYs gained compared with RS, relatively. Model showed that maintenance fuzuloparib achieved at least an 85.5% probability of CE at the threshold of $37654.50/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that the results were sensitive to the PFS and the price of medicines. Conclusion: Fuzuloparib was less cost-effective for patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutation and platinum-sensitive recurrent OC compared to olaparib, but was superior to niraparib from the Chinese healthcare systems perspective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study assessed the real-world application, effectiveness, and safety of olaparib and niraparib as maintenance therapies in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC) in China and investigated clinical factors associated with prolonged benefits of poly ADPribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors to help guide clinician treatment-decision making in daily practice. Methods: This real-world single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute. Archival data of consecutive patients diagnosed with PSROC who achieved a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) after the last platinum-based chemotherapy and treated with olaparib or niraparib as maintenance therapy from August 2018 to September 2021 were collected. Results: Overall, 106 women were included in the cohort. Seventy-two (68%) patients were treated with olaparib, while 34 (32%) received niraparib; 99.1% of the patients were diagnosed with high-grade serous carcinoma, and 73.6% had FIGO stages III-IV. Approximately 71.7% of the patients had received PARP inhibitors after the second platinum-based line and 44.3% of the patients achieved a CR in their last platinum-based therapy. The median platinumfree interval (PFI) after the penultimate platinum-based therapy was 10 (95% CI: 10-13.6) months. The median PFS was 21 (95% CI: 13-24.5) months and the median CFI was 22 (95% CI: 16-26.5) months. Consistent with the univariate analysis, the multivariate analysis identified three independent factors associated with prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) and chemotherapy-free interval (CFI): breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA) mutant type (p = 0.005 and p = 0.003); PFI =12 months (p = 0.01 and p = 0.006); and CR to last platinum-based therapy (p = 0.016 and p = 0.019). It was found that there was no appreciable difference in any grade 3-4 hematological AE between patients who received olaparib and niraparib. Conclusion: Maintenance treatment with olaparib and niraparib is effective and well tolerated for PSROC patients in real-world clinical practice. Three clinical factors were identified that predicted prolonged survival under maintenance therapy with PARP inhibitors: BRCA mutant type, PFI =12 months, and CR to last platinum-based therapy. These findings should be further confirmed with an appropriately powered analysis in studies with larger sample sizes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of niraparib (a poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase [PARP] inhibitor) maintenance therapy among patients with uterine serous carcinoma (USC) who achieved complete remission (CR) or partial remission (PR) to the last line of platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods: In this open-label, multi-center, prospective, exploratory clinical study in China, the maintenance therapy cohort patients with USC (stage I-IV) with CR or PR to 1 line or first-time recurrent platinum-based therapy were received niraparib once-daily. A starting dose of 200 mg once daily (QD) was used, except in patients with a baseline body weight of =77 kg and platelet count =150,000/µL who received 300 mg QD. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 12 months assessed by Investigator and analyzed using Kaplan-Meir method with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) (NCT04716686). Results: From August 24, 2021, to August 31, 2023, a total of 23 patients were enrolled at 5 clinical centers. median followup for PFS was 16.3 months (95% CI=11.2-21.5). At baseline, 78.2% (18/23) were International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III or IV. The 95.6% (22/23) patients undergone cytoreductive surgery. The 39.1% (9/23) patients had undergone radiotherapy. Among patients who evaluated (n=21), the PFS rate at 12 months in niraparib maintenance therapy was 84.7% (95% CI=59.5%-94.8%). The safety profile of niraparib was consistent with previous studies. Conclusion: It was first time to investigate the efficacy and safety of niraparib monotherapy as maintenance therapy in Chinese patients with USC. PFS rates at 12 months (84.7%) showed a clinically meaningful improvement in patients receiving niraparib maintenance therapy. Niraparib was generally well tolerated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Niraparib, a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, is approved for first/second-line maintenance treatment of ovarian cancer patients with complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy, and multi-line monotherapy in BRCAmt patients or platinum-sensitive recurrence patients with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). We present real-world experience from a single center of China. Methods: Patients treated with niraparib in Jiangsu Cancer Hospital between June 2019 to July 2020 were recruited. The initial dose was given according to individualization. Response and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. and National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0, respectively. HRD testing (AmoyDx®) was detected in most patients. Treatment was given until unequivocal progression or intolerable toxicity. Results: Twenty-two patients all received niraparib at a bolus of 200 mg/d. Fifty percent of patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer are HRD-positive. Six patients underwent first-line maintenance therapy. Sixteen patients received exploratory therapy. Ultimately image evaluation revealed that two patients achieved partial response (PR) and one patient achieved stable disease (SD), yielding objective response rate (ORR) of 33.3% (95%CI = 0.060–0.759) and disease control rate (DCR) of 50% (95%CI = 0.140–0.861) in the exploratory multi-line monotherapy group. The most common AEs were nausea, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. Grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia were managed by dose reduction and interruption. Leg swelling was observed as a new adverse event. Conclusion: It is feasible that patients receiving a bolus of 200 mg/d in patients from Chinese population can acquire promising efficacy and tolerance. This is the first real-world data about niraparib in ovarian cancer patients with available HRD status from China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study evaluated maintenance treatment with niraparib, a potent inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1/2, in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. In this phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted at 30 centers in China, adults with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer who had responded to their most recent platinum-containing chemotherapy were randomized 2 : 1 to receive oral niraparib (300 mg/day) or matched placebo until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (NCT03705156). Following a protocol amendment, patients with a bodyweight <77 kg or a platelet count <150 × 103/μl received 200 mg/day, and all other patients 300 mg/day, as an individualized starting dose (ISD). Randomization was carried out by an interactive web response system and stratified by BRCA mutation, time to recurrence following penultimate chemotherapy, and response to most recent chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent central review. Between 26 September 2017 and 2 February 2019, 265 patients were randomized to receive niraparib (n = 177) or placebo (n = 88); 249 patients received an ISD (300 mg, n = 14; 200 mg, n = 235) as per protocol. In the intention-to-treat population, median PFS was significantly longer for patients receiving niraparib versus placebo: 18.3 [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.9-not evaluable] versus 5.4 (95% CI, 3.7-5.7) months [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.23-0.45; P < 0.0001], and a similar PFS benefit was observed in patients receiving an ISD, regardless of BRCA mutation status. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 50.8% and 19.3% of patients who received niraparib and placebo, respectively; the most common events were neutrophil count decreased (20.3% versus 8.0%) and anemia (14.7% versus 2.3%). Niraparib maintenance treatment reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 68% and prolonged PFS compared to placebo in patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. Individualized niraparib dosing is effective and safe and should be considered standard practice in this setting. • Chinese patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer received maintenance niraparib (n = 177) or placebo (n = 88). • Median PFS was longer for niraparib versus placebo: 18.3 versus 5.4 months (HR = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.23-0.45; P < 0.0001). • Niraparib had a similar PFS benefit for 249 patients receiving individualized dosing based on bodyweight and platelet count. • Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 50.8% and 19.3% of patients who received niraparib and placebo, respectively. • In the niraparib group, Grade ≥3 platelet count decreased/thrombocytopenia occurred in 11.3% of patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the second most common gynecologic malignancy in China, and the incidence and mortality rates have increased in recent years. Brain metastasis from EC is extremely rare, affecting only 0.3-1.16% of EC patients. The prognosis for patients with brain metastasis from EC is poor, with a median survival time of 3.5-6.5 months from the diagnosis of brain metastasis. Niraparib is a poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that uses the concept of synthetic lethality in the presence of a mutation in the breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA). Niraparib is recommended as a maintenance treatment for ovarian cancer patients with platinum-sensitive relapse and has been shown to increase progression-free survival. Niraparib was found to enter the brain via the blood-brain barrier, which resulted in a higher concentration of the drug in the brain tissues and better tumor-suppressing effects. There was none report about the applications of PARP inhibitor for endometrial cancer with brain metastases. Here, we present the case of a 62-year-old woman whose Peripheral blood gene detection had shown BRCA1 mutation with brain metastases from high-grade serous carcinoma of the endometrium who was successfully treated with Niraparib and remained free of disease progression for 6 months.