Search

Background : Self-sampling HPV test and thermal ablation are effective tools to increase screening coverage and treatment compliance for accelerating cervical cancer elimination. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of their combined strategies to inform accessible, affordable, and acceptable cervical cancer prevention strategies. Methods: We developed a hybrid model to evaluate costs, health outcomes, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) of six screen-and-treat strategies combining HPV testing (self-sampling or physician-sampling), triage modalities (HPV genotyping, colposcopy or none) and thermal ablation, from a societal perspective. A designated initial cohort of 100,000 females born in 2015 was considered. Strategies with an ICER less than the Chinese gross domestic product (GDP) per capita ($10,350) were considered highly cost-effective. Results: Compared with current strategies in China (physician-HPV with genotype or cytology triage), all screen-and-treat strategies are cost-effective and self-HPV without triage is optimal with the most incremental quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained (220 to 440) in rural and urban China. Each screen-and-treat strategy based on self-collected samples is cost-saving compared with current strategies (−$818,430 to −$3540) whereas more costs are incurred using physician-collected samples compared with current physician-HPV with genotype triage (+$20,840 to +$182,840). For screen-and-treat strategies without triage, more costs (+$9404 to +$380,217) would be invested in the screening and treatment of precancerous lesions rather than the cancer treatment compared with the current screening strategies. Notably, however, more than 81.6% of HPV-positive women would be overtreated. If triaged with HPV 7 types or HPV16/18 genotypes, 79.1% or 67.2% (respectively) of HPV-positive women would be overtreated with fewer cancer cases avoided (19 cases or 69 cases). Conclusions: Screen-and-treat strategy using self-sampling HPV test linked to thermal ablation could be the most cost-effective for cervical cancer prevention in China. Additional triage with quality-assured performance could reduce overtreatment and remains highly cost-effective compared with current strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This study investigated the feasibility of ultrasound (US)-guided microwave ablation (MWA) as a treatment for nonpuerperal mastitis (NPM). Methods: Fifty-three patients with NPM diagnosed by biopsy and treated with US-guided MWA at the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University between September 2020 and February 2022 were classified according to whether they underwent MWA alone (n = 29) or MWA with incision and drainage (n = 24). Patients were followed up by interviews, physical and US examinations, and evaluation of breast skin at 1 week and 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment. Data from these patients were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Results: The overall mean patient age was 34.42 ± 9.20 years. The groups differed significantly by age, involved quadrants, and the initial maximum diameter of lesions. In the MWA group, the cure rate was 34.48%, and the apparent efficiency rate was 65.52%. In the MWA with incision and drainage, the apparent efficiency rate was 91.66%, and the effective rate was 4.17%. The excellent rate for breast aesthetics in the MWA group was 79.31%, and the good rate was 20.69%. The excellent rate in the MWA with incision and drainage group was 45.83%, the good rate was 41.67%, and the qualified rate was 12.5%. The mean maximum diameter of lesions in the two groups decreased significantly. Conclusion: For NPM with small lesions in a single quadrant, MWA therapy is a direct and effective method. For larger lesions involving two or more quadrants, the combined treatment of MWA with incision and drainage showed significant improvement in a short period. MWA treatment of NPM has importance for further research and clinical applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Thermal ablation has been increasingly used in the treatment of lung cancer in recent years. This meta-analysis aims to investigate the therapeutic effect and safety of thermal ablation plus chemotherapy as compared with chemotherapy alone in treating patients with lung malignancy in China based on current evidence. Methods: Databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for clinical reports. Additional literature search was also performed by searching the reference list of included studies and latest reviews. Raw data including objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival and the incidence of major complication were extracted and pooled. Results: A total of 12 studies in China including 1282 patients with lung malignancy were included in this meta-analysis. The number of studies that reported data of objective response rate, disease control rate, progression-free survival, overall survival and major complication was 8, 7, 7, 6 and 7, respectively. The combination therapy of thermal ablation plus chemotherapy showed a significantly better efficacy in improving objective response rate (odds ratio = 2.73; P < 0.001) and disease control rate (odds ratio = 2.43; P < 0.001) as compared with chemotherapy alone. Thermal ablation was also a significant protective factor for progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.43; P < 0.001) and overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.49; P < 0.001). Besides, thermal ablation did not increase the risk of major complication (odds ratio = 0.75; P = 0.252). Conclusion: The present meta-analysis based on these studies in China suggested that thermal ablation is a promising technique to provide better disease response and survival outcomes for patients with lung malignancy. Thermal ablation is worth further promotion in treating lung malignancy and application in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: With the aim of standardizing and improving the use of ultrasound-guided PLA on PTMC, a panel of experts from China and Italy, jointly issued this expert consensus on the clinical use of PLA for low-risk PTMC. Methods: This expert consensus was developed by Chinese and Italian experts who have specific competence and expertise in this area. An evidence-based approach combining the knowledge and practical experience of the panelists was utilized. Results: Twenty-six expert consensus recommendations were developed, spanning topics including the indications and contraindications of PLA for PTMC, physician training, preoperative preparation of patients, intraoperative technical procedures, possible complications, efficacy assessment, follow-up strategy, the approach to new PTMC and metastatic lymph nodes after treatment, thyroid-stimulating hormone inhibition therapy, and quality control of the entire procedure. Conclusion: We summarized practical recommendations about standardized and improved PLA treatment for PTMC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Thermal ablation is a point‐of‐care ablative treatment technique for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). However, limited information is available about its efficacy in low‐ and middle‐income countries. We evaluated the efficacy of thermal ablation in treatment of CIN detected through high‐risk human papillomavirus (HPV) screening in China. Women positive on high‐risk HPV and having colposcopically suspected lesions eligible for ablation underwent colposcopy, biopsy and thermal ablation in one visit. Women ineligible were recalled for large loop excision of transformation zone (LLETZ) when histopathology results were high‐grade CIN. Posttreatment follow‐up at 6 months or more was with HPV test and cytology followed by colposcopy and biopsy for HPV and/or cytology‐positive women. Cure was defined as either negative cytology and HPV test or absence of histopathology proved CIN in any positive women. Of total 218 HPV‐positive women treated with thermal ablation (n = 170) or LLETZ (n = 48), 196 reported for follow‐up evaluation. For women with histologically confirmed CIN at baseline (thermal ablation‐104; LLETZ‐38), cure rates were 84.6% for thermal ablation and 86.8% for LLETZ. Cure rates after thermal ablation were 90.3% for CIN grade one (CIN1) and 76.2% for CIN grade two or worse (CIN2+). HPV clearance rate was 80.4% in women undergoing thermal ablation, which was lower for HPV16/18 compared to other oncogenic types (67.6% vs 85.7%). HPV test had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.7% to detect CIN2+ at follow‐up and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 40.4%. Thermal ablation is effective to treat CIN as well as to clear the high‐risk HPV infection. HPV test has high PPV and NPV in following up patients posttreatment. What's new? When premalignant cervical lesions are detected following HPV screening, thermal ablation (TA) may be an ideal point‐of‐care treatment option for lower‐income regions. But is it effective enough to warrant widespread use in these areas? In this prospective Chinese study, the authors found that the answer is yes, with the added benefit that TA may also clear high‐risk HPV infection. These results support the use of thermal ablation following colposcopy during a single clinic visit, in order to improve access to treatment of premalignant cervical lesions in regions with fewer resources. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human papillomavirus (HPV) test, self‐sampling and thermal ablation for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) have been developed separately to increase screening coverage and treatment compliance of cervical cancer screening programmes. A large‐scale study in rural China screened 9,526 women with their combinations to explore the optimal cervical cancer‐screening cascade in the real‐world. Participants received careHPV and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) HPV tests on self‐collected samples. Women positive on either HPV test underwent colposcopy, biopsy and thermal ablation in a single visit. Samples positive on either HPV test were retested for genotyping. Absolute and relative performance of HPV tests, triage strategies, 'colposcopy and thermal ablation' approach were statistically evaluated. PCR HPV test detected 33.3% more CIN grade two or worse (CIN2+) at a cost of 28.1% more colposcopies compared to careHPV. Sensitivities of PCR HPV and careHPV tests to detect CIN2+ were 96.7 and 72.5%. Specificities for the same disease outcome were 82.1 and 86.0%. Triaging HPV‐positive women with HPV16/18 genotyping considerably improved the positive predictive value for CIN2+ (4.8–5.0 to 18.2–19.2%). Ninety‐six women positive on HPV and having abnormal colposcopy were eligible for thermal ablation and all accepted same‐day treatment, contributing to 64.6% being treated appropriately (CIN1+ on histopathology), which reached up to 84.8% among women positive on HPV 16/18 triage. No serious side‐effects/complications were reported. The combination of PCR HPV test followed by HPV 16/18 triaging on self‐collected samples and colposcopy of triage positive women followed by immediate thermal ablation might be the appropriate screening cascade for rural China. What's new? To be effective, cervical cancer screening programs must be tailored to the needs of the target population. In rural China, screening coverage is low, and women may not return for separate diagnosis and treatment visits. Here, the authors evaluated various screening protocols under real world conditions. They found that self‐sampling, PCR HPV test and triage based on HPV16/18 genotyping, followed by colposcopy and immediate thermal ablation in a single visit, could be the most efficient screening cascade for this rural population. This plan reduced costs while increasing compliance for follow up care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ultrasound-guided thermal ablation plays an important role in the management of thyroid disease. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of thermal ablation for patients with solitary T1bN0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) who are ineligible for or unwilling to undergo surgery., Materials and Methods: Data pertaining to 172 patients (38 males and 134 females) who received thermal ablation therapy at 12 hospitals between April 2015 and March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The mean duration of follow-up was 24.9 ± 14.1 months (range, 12-60). The technical feasibility, technical success, efficacy, and safety of treatment were analyzed. Postablation tumor size at various time points was compared with preablation measurement., Results: All patients selected for thermal ablation received enlarged ablation, according to contrast-enhanced ultrasound postablation. The maximum diameter and volume of ablation zone at 6, 12, 18, 24, 36, and 48 months postablation were significantly smaller than those recorded preablation (P < 0.05 for all). At the most recent follow-up, 106 (61.6%) tumors had completely disappeared. The rate of lymph node metastasis was 0.6% (1/172) and the incidence of new tumors was 1.2% (2/172). The overall complication rate was 5.2% (9/172) (major complications: 4.6% [8/172]; minor complications: 0.6% [1/172]). All major complications were relieved within 4 months postablation., Conclusion: Thermal ablation may be a feasible, effective, and safe treatment option for patients with solitary T1bN0M0 PTC who are ineligible for or unwilling to undergo surgery. It may provide a novel treatment option for selected patients., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To develop a clinicopathological-based nomogram to improve the prediction of the seeding risk of after percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) in primary liver carcinoma (PLC)., Methods: A total of 2030 patients with PLC who underwent PTA were included between April 2009 and December 2018. The patients were grouped into a training dataset (n = 1024) and an external validation dataset (n = 1006). Baseline characteristics were collected to identify the risk factors of seeding after PTA. The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model based on the risk factors was used to develop the nomogram, which was used for assessment for its predictive accuracy using mainly the Harrell's C-index and receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC)., Results: The median follow-up time was 30.3 months (range, 3.2-115.7 months). The seeding risk was 0.89% per tumor and 1.5% per patient in the training set. The nomogram was developed based on tumor size, subcapsular, α-fetoprotein (AFP), and international normalized ratio (INR). The 1-, 2-, and 3-year cumulative seeding rates were 0.1%, 0.7% and 1.2% in the low-risk group, and 1.7%, 6.3% and 6.3% in the high-risk group, respectively, showing significant statistical difference (P < .001). The nomogram had good calibration and discriminatory abilities in the training set, with C-indexes of 0.722 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.661, 0.883) and AUC of 0.850 (95% CI: 0.767, 0.934). External validation with 1000 bootstrapped sample sets showed a good C-index of 0.706 (95% CI: 0.546, 0.866) and AUC of 0.736 (95% CI: 0. 646, 0.827)., Conclusions: The clinicopathological-based nomogram could be used to quantify the probability of seeding risk after PTA in PLC., (© 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)