1. Self-expandable metallic stents may be more efficient than balloon dilatation alone for esophageal stricture after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection: a retrospective cohort study in China.
- Author
-
Gao, Jie, An, Wei, Meng, Qianqian, Li, Zhaoshen, and Shi, Xingang
- Subjects
WOUND healing ,T-test (Statistics) ,SURGICAL stents ,CATHETERIZATION ,RETROSPECTIVE studies ,PREDNISONE ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,MANN Whitney U Test ,CHI-squared test ,LONGITUDINAL method ,SURGICAL complications ,KAPLAN-Meier estimator ,ENDOSCOPIC gastrointestinal surgery ,DATA analysis software ,ESOPHAGEAL stenosis - Abstract
Introduction: Self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) can be used to treat esophageal stricture after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), but its efficacy and placement timing remain to be determined. In this study, the treatment time and number of dilatations were compared between the SEMS placement group and the balloon dilatation (BD) group to clarify the efficacy and placement time of SEMSs in the treatment of esophageal stricture after circumferential esophageal ESD. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients with esophageal stricture after circumferential ESD between January 2015 and January 2020 were included. Data on the patients' demographic characteristics, esophageal lesion-related factors, esophageal stricture occurrence, and measures taken to treat the stricture were collected. The primary outcome was the treatment time, and the secondary outcome was the number of dilatations. Results: The total number of dilatations was 30 in the SEMS group and 106 in the BD group. The average number of dilatations in the SEMS group (1.76 ± 1.64) was significantly lower than that in the BD group (4.42 ± 5.32) (P = 0.016). Among the patients who underwent SEMS placement first had a shorter treatment time (average 119 days) than those who underwent BD first (average 245 days) (P = 0.041), and the average number of dilatations inpatients who underwent SEMS placement first (0.71 ± 1.07) was significantly lower than that in the patients who underwent BD first (2.5 ± 1.54). Conclusion: SEMSs were more efficient in the treatment of esophageal stricture in a cohort of patients after circumferential esophageal ESD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF