Search

• The thermal decomposition of marine carbonates and metasediments is a source of CO 2. • The radioactive decay of U and Th within crustal granite is the dominant source of He. • Three thermal reservoirs were identified using multiple gas geothermometers. • The parent geothermal fluid had a temperature of ∼320 °C at an ∼8-km depth. • Yangbajing has no supercritical fluids, given its small, deep-seated magma chamber. Exploring and exploiting high-temperature (even supercritical) geothermal resources are significant to meet energy demands and reduce carbon emissions. The Yangbajing geothermal field is the most exploited in China, with the currently highest temperature (329.8 °C) measured in a geothermal well. However, whether there are supercritical geothermal fluids beneath the deep parts of this geothermal field is under controversy. In this paper, the water isotope, chemical compositions, and C–He isotopes of gas samples were collected and analyzed. The geothermal water originated from the mixing of meteoric water and magmatic water (25%). The sources of CO 2 in the geothermal field were dominated by the thermogenic degassing of carbonates and metasediments in the crust while the radioactive decay of U and Th in granite is the dominated source of He. The temperatures of three different reservoirs are 150 ± 15 °C, 250 ± 10 °C, and ∼320 °C (with a depth of ∼8 km), respectively. These were obtained using dissolved gas, soil CO 2 flux, and noble gas geothermometers. Unlike other supercritical geothermal fields worldwide with larger, shallower, basaltic magma chambers, the Yangbajing geothermal field has a deep-seated, small-scale, granitic magma chamber. Thus, its geological conditions are not conducive for gestating supercritical fluids. These results are of great significance for exploring and developing high-temperature (even ultra-high-temperature) geothermal resources in China. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• A framework to determine sensitive monitoring and diagnostic indicators. • Authentic formation water originated from seawater and mixed with meteoric water. • Cl, Br, Na, Li, Ba, 87Sr/87Sr, and δ11B are the most sensitive indicators. • About 0.05% of formation water in shallow groundwater can be identified. • A groundwater contamination case has confirmed the effectiveness of the method. Potential environmental impacts on shallow groundwater from shale gas development facilitated by horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing is a widely debated "hot topic". In terms of potential aqueous phase contamination (including flowback fluids and produced water), there is a large gap in knowledge of the indicators for routine monitoring and contamination tracing, which should be considered critical and should be prioritized for analysis. Since formation water from shale formations is the main source of flowback fluids and produced water, and there are significant differences in some specific inorganic geochemical and isotopic compositions between shallow groundwater and formation water, this study has provided a framework to determine sensitive monitoring and diagnostic indicators for tracing potential groundwater contamination from produced water using end-member analysis. The results from a case study of the Fuling Gasfield, Sichuan Basin, SW China as the first and largest commercial shale gas development site in China, shows that produced authentic formation water with similar Br/Cl and Na/Cl ratio with seawater and low δ2H and δ18O values compared to the evaporated seawater might originate from evaporated seawater modified by water-rock interactions and be mixed with fresh meteoric water. The inorganic geochemical and isotopic indicators, such as Ba, Li, Na, Cl, Br, 87Sr/86Sr (as ε Sr sw) and δ11B are sensitive to the detection of contamination of fresh shallow groundwater by produced formation water, even in very small fractions (0.05%). Meanwhile, we present a groundwater contamination case related to shale gas development in the Fuling Gasfield. The robust conservative geochemical (Cl and Br) and isotopic (δ11B and ε Sr sw) mass balances show that 0.2–0.9% of formation water entered the shallow groundwater causing contamination. The case has also confirmed the effectiveness of those indicators. Findings from this study may help to improve groundwater monitoring and environmental regulations in countries with shale gas exploration and development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]