1. Robot-Assisted Cochlear Implantation: The Robotol® System Experience.
- Author
-
De Seta, Daniele, Nguyen, Yann, Daoudi, Hannah, Torres, Renato, Mosnier, Isabelle, and Sterkers, Olivier
- Subjects
- *
COCHLEAR implants , *MASTOIDECTOMY , *SURGICAL robots , *MIDDLE ear surgery , *BASILAR membrane , *IMAGE reconstruction , *MIDDLE ear , *TREMOR , *ESSENTIAL tremor - Abstract
Background: Robotic surgery in the last years has gained popularity in otology as an effective tool to improve the accuracy of surgical gestures by reducing involuntary movements of the surgeon such as tremor, drift, undershoot and overshoot, and jerk-a sudden muscular reflex. Moreover, it could improve the force-control feedback. Recent studies report that cochlear implantation may take advantage of the robotic assistance in all the steps of the surgery: the approach to the middle ear by automated mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy through a tunnel also known as direct cochlea access; a minimally invasive cochleostomy by means of robotassisted drilling tool; the alignment of the correct insertion axis on the cochlear basal turn; the insertion of the electrodes array via motorized insertion tools. Methods: We report the experience of the cochlear implantation with the RobOtol® system, a robot-based teleoperated arm with 6 df developed to be able to operate in the middle ear and mastoid. Cochlear insertions are possible using specific tools available for the different electrode arrays (straight or precurved) that can be connected to the instrument holder arm. After the opening of the round window membrane, the array is aligned to the chosen insertion axis and pushed in the scala tympani by the controlled movement of the robotic arm; for this purpose, all the axes of freedom of the robot are blocked (X-, Y-, and rotation axes) with the exception of the Z-axis, allowing the robot arm to move linearly along the trajectory at constant low insertion speed. In the present series, both straight (8 Cochlear CI522/622 and 8 AB Slim J) and precurved (4 AB Mid-Scala) electrode arrays were robotically implanted and matched to 40 manual implantations. Three-dimensional reconstruction images of the basilar membrane and the electrode arrays were obtained from pre- and postimplantation CT scans, and intracochlear EA position was analyzed. Results: At present, more than 100 CIs have been implanted with the aid of RobOtol® in several cochlear implant centers around Europe and China, and the number of procedures and published data from these groups is rapidly increasing. For straight electrode arrays, scalar translocations occurred in 19% of the robot-assisted group and 31% of the manually inserted group. Considering the number of translocated electrodes, this was lower in the robot-assisted group (7%) than in the manually inserted group (16%) (P < .0001). For precurved electrode arrays, scalar translocations occurred in 50% of the robot-assisted group and 38% of the manually inserted group. The average total time of surgery was 138±7.1 minutes versus 109±4.0 minutes for the manual insertions. Conclusion: The results from the first robotized electrode arrays insertions were very encouraging, showing a trend to less traumatic insertion compared with manual insertion. The use of robot-assisted insertion allows a slow and constant insertion speed and the possibility to modify the insertion axis during the insertion, for example, in the case of changes during intraoperative electrocochleography recording. Furthermore, preoperative calculation of the optimal insertion axis enables a robotic semiautomated insertion and would further reduce the incidence of electrode array misplacement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF