1. Catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug therapy for sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
- Author
-
Dong Y, Song X, Bo D, Wang H, Yang B, Yadav N, Chen Q, Xu R, Chen H, Ju W, Cao K, Chen M, and Zhang F
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Time Factors, Adult, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Aged, Heart Rate, China, Tachycardia, Ventricular diagnosis, Tachycardia, Ventricular physiopathology, Tachycardia, Ventricular mortality, Tachycardia, Ventricular therapy, Tachycardia, Ventricular etiology, Tachycardia, Ventricular surgery, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents therapeutic use, Anti-Arrhythmia Agents adverse effects, Catheter Ablation adverse effects, Catheter Ablation mortality, Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic mortality, Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic complications, Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic diagnosis, Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic physiopathology, Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic surgery, Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic therapy, Recurrence
- Abstract
Background: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) is the primary cause of sudden cardiac death in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, the strategy for VT treatment in HCM patients remains unclear. This study is aimed to compare the effectiveness of catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) therapy for sustained VT in patients with HCM., Methods: A total of 28 HCM patients with sustained VT at 4 different centers between December 2012 and December 2021 were enrolled. Twelve underwent catheter ablation (ablation group) and sixteen received AAD therapy (AAD group). The primary outcome was VT recurrence during follow-up., Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable between two groups. After a mean follow-up of 31.4 ± 17.5 months, the primary outcome occurred in 35.7% of the ablation group and 90.6% of the AAD group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.29 [95%CI, 0.10-0.89]; P = 0.021). No differences in hospital admission due to cardiovascular cause (25.0% vs. 71.0%; P = 0.138) and cardiovascular cause-related mortality/heart transplantation (9.1% vs. 50.6%; P = 0.551) were observed. However, there was a significant reduction in the composite endpoint of VT recurrence, hospital admission due to cardiovascular cause, cardiovascular cause-related mortality, or heart transplantation in ablation group as compared to that of AAD group (42.9% vs. 93.7%; HR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.12-0.95]; P = 0.029)., Conclusions: In HCM patients with sustained VT, catheter ablation reduced the VT recurrence, and the composite endpoint of VT recurrence, hospital admission due to cardiovascular cause, cardiovascular cause-related mortality, or heart transplantation as compared to AAD., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF