Search

Objective/Context: Central America, Colombia and Venezuela face important security challenges. Despite its rhetoric about the importance of human security, the EU applies different policies to the three conflicts: a securitydevelopment nexus in Central America, a combination of donor engagement and "securitization" in Colombia and a mixture of sanctions and diplomacy in Venezuela. Employing a comparative approach based on a common methodological framework, this article sets out to determine which EU concept of security -- State or human-focused --is applied to each conflict and assess its degree of coherence. Methodology: Basing itself on a qualitative content analysis, the article addresses the following question: to what extent does State or human security govern the EU´s respective policies towards these countries and how consistent are they? Conclusions: The article finds that, despite its official discourse, the EU´s securitydevelopment nexus is not a coherent policy and its relationship with the United States, its transatlantic "partner" and the region's main donor, are mainly responsible for that policy´s internal and external inconsistencies. Originality: The article questions the EU's image as a soft power and development partner. Although the EU continues to deal with the causes of insecurity, like inequality and poverty, rather than its consequences, its development-security nexus tends to "securitize" development, particularly in countries, like Colombia and Venezuela, which, due to their armed conflicts and fragile States, are regarded as "security threats." [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]