1. A randomized phase II efficacy and safety study of vandetanib (ZD6474) in combination with bicalutamide versus bicalutamide alone in patients with chemotherapy naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer.
- Author
-
Azad, Arun, Beardsley, Emma, Hotte, Sebastian, Ellard, Susan, Klotz, Lawrence, Chin, Joseph, Kollmannsberger, Christian, Mukherjee, Som, and Chi, Kim
- Subjects
VASCULAR endothelial growth factor antagonists ,TUMOR markers ,ANTIANDROGENS ,ANTINEOPLASTIC agents ,BLOOD testing ,CELL receptors ,COMBINATION drug therapy ,CHEST X rays ,CHI-squared test ,CLINICAL medicine ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY ,EPIDERMAL growth factor ,EVALUATION of medical care ,MEDICAL cooperation ,METASTASIS ,PHOSPHOTRANSFERASES ,PROSTATE tumors ,RADIONUCLIDE imaging ,RESEARCH ,SAFETY ,TOMOGRAPHY ,U-statistics ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,KAPLAN-Meier estimator ,CHEMICAL inhibitors ,THERAPEUTICS - Abstract
Purpose To investigate the efficacy and safety of combining vandetanib, an orally available multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), with bicalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Methods This was an open-label, randomized phase II multi-center study. Eligible patients had rising PSA on androgen deprivation therapy, minimal symptoms and were chemotherapy-naïve. Protocol therapy was either vandetanib 300 mg oral daily plus bicalutamide 50 mg oral daily (Arm A) or bicalutamide 50 mg oral daily alone (Arm B) with cross-over to vandetanib monotherapy at progression. The primary endpoint was PSA response (≥ 50 % decline from baseline). Results Thirty-nine patients were recruited, 19 in Arm A and 20 in Arm B. PSA response was comparable in Arm A and Arm B (18 vs. 19 %). Time to PSA progression was 3.16 months (95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.09, not reached (NR)) for Arm A and 3.09 months (95 % CI: 1.22, NR) for Arm B. Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was more common in Arm A compared to Arm B (42 vs. 5 %; p = 0.019). Treatment with vandetanib was associated with a reduction in soluble VEGFR-2 levels after two cycles but an increase in plasma VEGF levels. Conclusion The combination of vandetanib and bicalutamide was associated with considerable toxicity and did not have superior efficacy over bicalutamide alone. Further evaluation of this combination is not warranted in mCRPC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF