Search

With the growth of the low altitude remote sensing (LARS) industry in recent years, their practical application in precision agriculture seems all the more possible. However, only a few scientists have reported using LARS to monitor crop conditions. Moreover, there have been concerns regarding the feasibility of such systems for producers given the issues related to the post-processing of images, technical expertise, and timely delivery of information. The purpose of this study is to showcase actual requests by farmers to monitor crop conditions in their fields using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). Working in collaboration with farmers in northeastern Ontario, we use optical and near-infrared imagery to monitor fertilizer trials, conduct crop scouting and map field tile drainage. We demonstrate that LARS imagery has many practical applications. However, several obstacles remain, including the costs associated with both the LARS system and the image processing software, the extent of professional training required to operate the LARS and to process the imagery, and the influence from local weather conditions (e.g. clouds, wind) on image acquisition all need to be considered. Consequently, at present a feasible solution for producers might be the use of LARS service provided by private consultants or in collaboration with LARS scientific research teams. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We recently completed the accuracy assessment of a Landsat-derived landcover polygon layer covering the entire province of Alberta (660,000 km2), Canada, for which we gathered reference information for nearly 5000 randomly selected polygons ranging from two hectares to thousands of hectares in size. This gave us the unique opportunity to quantify, for the first time, how the probability of correctly classifying a landcover object varies with its size. Irrespective of whether they are represented as polygons or as sets of connected pixels with the same label, the classification accuracy of landcover objects decreases as their size decreases, steadily for large and medium sizes, and more dramatically when they are within two orders of magnitude of the pixel size of the input image. We show that this size-dependency is bound to occur whenever the size distribution of landcover objects follows an inverse power law. Our results are consistent with previous studies on related issues, confirm the need to account for size when assessing the accuracy of object-based landcover maps, and cast doubts on the validity of (1) recently proposed object-based accuracy estimators, and (2) landscape pattern analyses where the minimum patch size is close to the pixel size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]