Search

Background: There is a paucity of the literature on the relationship between frailty and excess mortality due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The entire community-dwelling adult population of Ontario, Canada, as of January 1st, 2018, was identified using the Cardiovascular Health in Ambulatory Care Research Team (CANHEART) cohort. Residents of long-term care facilities were excluded. Frailty was categorized through the Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups (ACG® System) frailty indicator. Follow-up was until December 31st, 2020, with March 11th, 2020, indicating the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Using multivariable Cox models with patient age as the timescale, we determined the relationship between frailty status and pandemic period on all-cause mortality. We evaluated the modifier effect of frailty using both stratified models as well as incorporating an interaction between frailty and the pandemic period. Results: We identified 11,481,391 persons in our cohort, of whom 3.2% were frail based on the ACG indicator. Crude mortality increased from 0.75 to 0.87% per 100 person years from the pre- to post-pandemic period, translating to ~ 13,800 excess deaths among the community-dwelling adult population of Ontario (HR 1.11 95% CI 1.09–1.11). Frailty was associated with a statistically significant increase in all-cause mortality (HR 3.02, 95% CI 2.99–3.06). However, all-cause mortality increased similarly during the pandemic in frail (aHR 1.13, 95% CI 1.09–1.16) and non-frail (aHR 1.15, 95% CI 1.13–1.17) persons. Conclusion: Although frailty was associated with greater mortality, frailty did not modify the excess mortality associated with the pandemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent and deadly complication after cardiac surgery. In the absence of effective therapies, a focus on risk factor identification and modification has been the mainstay of management. The authors sought to determine the impact of intraoperative hypotension on de novo postoperative renal replacement therapy in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, hypothesizing that prolonged periods of hypotension during and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were associated with an increased risk of renal replacement therapy.Methods: Included in this single-center retrospective cohort study were adult patients who underwent cardiac surgery requiring CPB between November 2009 and April 2015. Excluded were patients who were dialysis dependent, underwent thoracic aorta or off-pump procedures, or died before receiving renal replacement therapy. Degrees of hypotension were defined by mean arterial pressure (MAP) as less than 55, 55 to 64, and 65 to 74 mmHg before, during, and after CPB. The primary outcome was de novo renal replacement therapy.Results: Of 6,523 patient records, 336 (5.2%) required new postoperative renal replacement therapy. Each 10-min epoch of MAP less than 55 mmHg post-CPB was associated with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.13 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.23; P = 0.002), and each 10-min epoch of MAP between 55 and 64 mmHg post-CPB was associated with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.12 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.18; P = 0.0001) for renal replacement therapy. The authors did not observe an association between hypotension before and during CPB with renal replacement therapy.Conclusions: MAP less than 65 mmHg for 10 min or more post-CPB is associated with an increased risk of de novo postoperative renal replacement therapy. The association between intraoperative hypotension and AKI was weaker in comparison to factors such as renal insufficiency, heart failure, obesity, anemia, complex or emergent surgery, and new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation. Nonetheless, post-CPB hypotension is a potentially easier modifiable risk factor that warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: Handovers of anesthesia care from one anesthesiologist to another is an important intraoperative event. Despite its association with adverse events after noncardiac surgery, its impact in the context of cardiac surgery remains unclear., Objective: To compare the outcomes of patients who were exposed to anesthesia handover vs those who were unexposed to anesthesia handover during cardiac surgery., Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study in Ontario, Canada, included Ontario residents who were 18 years or older and had undergone coronary artery bypass grafting or aortic, mitral, tricuspid valve, or thoracic aorta surgical procedures between 2008 and 2019. Exclusion criteria were non-Ontario residency status and other concomitant procedures. Statistical analysis was conducted from April 2021 to June 2021, and data collection occurred between November 2020 to January 2021., Exposures: Complete handover of anesthesia care, where the case is completed by the replacement anesthesiologist., Main Outcomes and Measures: The coprimary outcomes were mortality within 30 days and 1 year after surgery. Secondary outcomes were patient-defined adverse cardiac and noncardiac events (PACE), intensive care unit (ICU), and hospital lengths of stay (LOS). Inverse probability of treatment weighting based on the propensity score was used to estimate adjusted effect measures. Mortality was assessed using a Cox proportional hazard model, PACE using a cause-specific hazard model with death as a competing risk, and LOS using Poisson regression., Results: Of the 102 156 patients in the cohort, 25 207 (24.7%) were women; the mean (SD) age was 66.4 (10.8) years; and 72 843 of surgical procedures (71.3%) were performed in teaching hospitals. Handover occurred in 1926 patients (1.9%) and was associated with higher risks of 30-day mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.89; 95% CI, 1.41-2.54) and 1-year mortality (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.31-2.12), as well as longer ICU (risk ratio [RR], 1.43; 95% CI, 1.22-1.68) and hospital (RR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.28) LOS. There was no statistically significant association between handover and PACE (30 days: HR 1.09; 95% CI, 0.79-1.49; 1 year: HR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.70-1.13)., Conclusions and Relevance: Handover of anesthesia care during cardiac surgical procedures was associated with higher 30-day and 1-year mortality rates and increased health care resource use. Further research is needed to evaluate and systematically improve the handover process qualitatively.

Importance: There is little evidence to support patient-centered outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease., Objective: To derive patient-defined adverse cardiovascular and noncardiovascular events (PACE) through a consensus-based process., Design, Setting, and Participants: This pan-Canadian, consensus-based, qualitative study used an iterative Delphi method to achieve consensus within a 35-member panel consisting of patients with cardiovascular diseases and their caregivers and clinicians. The process included 4 rounds of online questionnaires, followed by an in-person final consensus meeting. Data analysis was performed in September 2019., Main Outcomes and Measures: Defining PACE as a 5-item composite outcome., Results: Thirty-five potential panelists consented to participate, including 11 clinicians (8 men [73%]) and 24 patients and caregivers (13 men [54%]). Twenty-nine (83%), 28 (80%), 26 (74%), and 23 (66%) of the panelists participated in each of respective the online rounds. A shortlist of 11 patient-defined items was further refined at the in-person meeting, which 20 of the panelists attended. The PACE definition that was decided through the consensus process was a composite of severe stroke necessitating hospitalization for 14 days or longer or inpatient rehabilitation, ventilator dependence, new onset or worsening heart failure, nursing home admission, or new onset dialysis., Conclusions and Relevance: This study defined PACE as a versatile, patient-centered outcome through a consensus process with input from patients, caregivers, and clinicians. Given the paucity of patient-centered outcomes in cardiovascular research, PACE may be considered as a potential outcome after methodological evaluation of its reliability.