1. Prediction of progression from pre-diabetes to diabetes: Development and validation of a machine learning model.
- Author
-
Cahn A, Shoshan A, Sagiv T, Yesharim R, Goshen R, Shalev V, and Raz I
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Canada epidemiology, Cohort Studies, Databases, Factual, Diabetes Mellitus epidemiology, Disease Progression, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Israel epidemiology, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Selection, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Time Factors, United Kingdom epidemiology, Diabetes Mellitus diagnosis, Electronic Health Records statistics & numerical data, Machine Learning, Prediabetic State physiopathology, Risk Assessment methods
- Abstract
Aims: Identification, a priori, of those at high risk of progression from pre-diabetes to diabetes may enable targeted delivery of interventional programmes while avoiding the burden of prevention and treatment in those at low risk. We studied whether the use of a machine-learning model can improve the prediction of incident diabetes utilizing patient data from electronic medical records., Methods: A machine-learning model predicting the progression from pre-diabetes to diabetes was developed using a gradient boosted trees model. The model was trained on data from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database cohort, internally validated on THIN data not used for training, and externally validated on the Canadian AppleTree and the Israeli Maccabi Health Services (MHS) data sets. The model's predictive ability was compared with that of a logistic-regression model within each data set., Results: A cohort of 852 454 individuals with pre-diabetes (glucose ≥ 100 mg/dL and/or HbA1c ≥ 5.7) was used for model training including 4.9 million time points using 900 features. The full model was eventually implemented using 69 variables, generated from 11 basic signals. The machine-learning model demonstrated superiority over the logistic-regression model, which was maintained at all sensitivity levels - comparing AUC [95% CI] between the models; in the THIN data set (0.865 [0.860,0.869] vs 0.778 [0.773,0.784] P < .05), the AppleTree data set (0.907 [0.896, 0.919] vs 0.880 [0.867, 0.894] P < .05) and the MHS data set (0.925 [0.923, 0.927] vs 0.876 [0.872, 0.879] P < .05)., Conclusions: Machine-learning models preserve their performance across populations in diabetes prediction, and can be integrated into large clinical systems, leading to judicious selection of persons for interventional programmes., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF