1. Rationale and design of a multicentre, double-blind, prospective, randomized, European and Canadian study: evaluating patient outcomes and costs of managing adults with post-stroke focal spasticity.
- Author
-
Borg J, Ward AB, Wissel J, Kulkarni J, Sakel M, Ertzgaard P, Åkerlund P, Reuter I, Herrmann C, Satkunam L, Wein T, Girod I, and Wright N
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Botulinum Toxins, Type A economics, Botulinum Toxins, Type A therapeutic use, Canada, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Double-Blind Method, Europe, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Goals, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Muscle Spasticity drug therapy, Muscle Spasticity etiology, Neuromuscular Agents economics, Neuromuscular Agents therapeutic use, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Prospective Studies, Stroke complications, Stroke drug therapy, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult, Muscle Spasticity rehabilitation, Stroke Rehabilitation
- Abstract
Objective: This report describes the design of a study aiming to provide evidence for the extended use of botulinum toxin A in focal post-stroke upper and lower limb spasticity and to evaluate the impact of incorporating botulinum toxin treatment into the rehabilitation of patients with spasticity., Design: International, prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label extension., Methods: Approximately 300 adults with a stroke occurring ≥ 3 months before screening, presenting with symptoms and signs of an upper motor neuron syndrome and focal spasticity-related functional impairment, were randomized to botulinum toxin (BOTOX®, Allergan Inc.) + standard care or placebo + standard care. Study medication was administered at baseline and again at Week 12 if required, with follow-up to 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the number of patients who achieved their investigator-rated principal active functional goal (as measured by Goal Attainment Scaling), at 10 weeks after the second injection (Weeks 22-34) or at the 24-week visit if no second injection was administered. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in level of goal achievement, health-related quality of life and resource utilization., Conclusion: Botulinum toxin A Economic Spasticity Trial (BEST) will provide information regarding clinical and cost-effectiveness of botulinum toxin + standard care vs standard care alone in patients with upper and/or lower limb post-stroke spasticity typically seen in clinical practice., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT-00549783.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF