Search

Study subjects were French-Canadian women with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive breast cancer (incident or prevalent) who were treated and followed at a single breast cancer clinic affiliated with the Research Center of University of Montreal (CRCHUM), who were either aged less than 50 years at diagnosis or who were 50 years or older and with at least two affected first- or second-degree relatives. Subjects were tested for six founder mutations (three in BRCA1 and three in BRCA2); 1093 eligible cases were tested. Of these, 56 women (5.1%) were mutation carriers, including 43 BRCA2 carriers and 13 BRCA1 carriers. The prevalence of mutations was 5.3% for unselected women aged 50 and less and was 4.6% for familial cases over age 50. The prevalence of mutations was 3.3% for women with DCIS and was 5.3% for women with invasive cancer. It is rational to offer genetic testing to all French-Canadian women diagnosed recently or in the past with either DCIS or invasive breast cancer before age 50 or with familial breast cancer above age 50., (© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Standard of care is to perform a complete lymph node dissection (CLND) in melanoma patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs). However, less than 20% will have metastases in non-SLNs. The S classification was described to predict the non-SLN status, hoping to identify a subset of patients who can be spared the CLND. We tried to validate the feasibility and usefulness of this classification., Materials and Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review. All melanoma cases between 1996 and 2006 were included, and 359 patients with SLN biopsies were identified. All pathology slides were reviewed with an emphasis on the S classification., Results: There were 365 SLN biopsies performed. A total of 82 patients (22.8%) had positive SLNs, while 277 patients (77.2%) had negative SLNs. There were 22 patients classified as SI, 18 as SII, 37 as SIII, and 5 were unclassified. On CLND, only 10 patients (12.2%) had positive non-SLNs. None of these were classified as SI while 2 patients (11%) were classified as SII and 8 (22%) as SIII. The S category was found to be a predictor of non-SLN status, and this reached statistical significance (P = 0.044). On univariate analysis, only an increasing Breslow depth and ulceration were predictive of a non-SI status., Conclusion: Our results suggest that the S classification is easily feasible and predicts the status of non-SLNs. No patient with SI status was found to have additional non-SLN positive nodes. A larger-scale, prospective trial should be done to confirm these results and possibly spare patients the morbidity of CLND with a positive SLN.