Search

Background & Aims: Hospitalized malnourished patients experience poor outcomes. Our study determined the feasibility of a novel nutritional care pathway which both rapidly identifies and treats malnourished medical inpatients accounting for the obstacles in nutritional optimization. In our interventional arm, we utilize peripheral parental nutrition (PPN) followed by oral nutritional supplementation (ONS) on a composite outcome of 30 day readmission, mortality and continued admission, as well other important clinical and nutritional outcomes. The study was registered under ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier no. NCT02632630., Methods: NutriSUP-PPN was a 2 × 2 factorial pilot randomized trial. In two large Canadian hospitals, we recruited 100 adult patients >18 years, < 48 h from admission to a general medicine ward who were moderately or severely malnourished. Patients received: 1. PPN for 5 days and then enhanced ONS until 30 days post randomization; 2. PPN for 5 days and then standard ONS until 30 days; 3. Standard care for intravenous (IV) fluid administration for 5 days and then enhanced ONS until 30 days; 4. Standard care for IV fluid administration for 5 days and standard ONS until 30 days. Our primary outcome was a composite of 30 day readmission, continued admission and mortality., Results: There was no significant differences in the composite outcome of 30 day readmission, continued admission or mortality between any interventional group and control. We did however note a trend in the PPN + ONS arm where only 4/22 patients versus 10/24 patients (p = 0.16) in the control (no PPN, no enhanced ONS) experienced an adverse outcome which was largely driven by a reduction of readmission in the ONS + PPN arm We demonstrated feasibility in recruitment, adherence to protocol, and safety. The incidence of sepsis was greater in the PPN arm compared to control (15.5% versus 4.2%) but was not statistically significant. Improvement in nutritional status for interventional arms were not significant compared to control. However, there was a trend of improvement in preventing decline of nutritional status in both the enhanced ONS arm and PPN + enhanced ONS arm., Conclusion: There are signals in our data, which suggest that the combination of PPN with ONS may improve both clinical and nutritional outcomes compared to PPN or ONS alone. We posit that a large, multi-center, definitive randomized control trial is now justified to determine if PPN for up to 5 days along with 30 days of ONS, versus standard of care, will improve a composite outcome of death, continued admission, and readmission at 30 days. However, because PPN was associated with a non-statistically significant increase in episodes of sepsis, future studies should ensure that sepsis episodes are well documented and monitored closely by the data safety monitoring board., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors do not have any conflicts of interest related to this publication., (Copyright © 2022 European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine if virtual care with remote automated monitoring (RAM) technology versus standard care increases days alive at home among adults discharged after non-elective surgery during the covid-19 pandemic., Design: Multicentre randomised controlled trial., Setting: 8 acute care hospitals in Canada., Participants: 905 adults (≥40 years) who resided in areas with mobile phone coverage and were to be discharged from hospital after non-elective surgery were randomised either to virtual care and RAM (n=451) or to standard care (n=454). 903 participants (99.8%) completed the 31 day follow-up., Intervention: Participants in the experimental group received a tablet computer and RAM technology that measured blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, temperature, and body weight. For 30 days the participants took daily biophysical measurements and photographs of their wound and interacted with nurses virtually. Participants in the standard care group received post-hospital discharge management according to the centre's usual care. Patients, healthcare providers, and data collectors were aware of patients' group allocations. Outcome adjudicators were blinded to group allocation., Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcome was days alive at home during 31 days of follow-up. The 12 secondary outcomes included acute hospital care, detection and correction of drug errors, and pain at 7, 15, and 30 days after randomisation., Results: All 905 participants (mean age 63.1 years) were analysed in the groups to which they were randomised. Days alive at home during 31 days of follow-up were 29.7 in the virtual care group and 29.5 in the standard care group: relative risk 1.01 (95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.02); absolute difference 0.2% (95% confidence interval -0.5% to 0.9%). 99 participants (22.0%) in the virtual care group and 124 (27.3%) in the standard care group required acute hospital care: relative risk 0.80 (0.64 to 1.01); absolute difference 5.3% (-0.3% to 10.9%). More participants in the virtual care group than standard care group had a drug error detected (134 (29.7%) v 25 (5.5%); absolute difference 24.2%, 19.5% to 28.9%) and a drug error corrected (absolute difference 24.4%, 19.9% to 28.9%). Fewer participants in the virtual care group than standard care group reported pain at 7, 15, and 30 days after randomisation: absolute differences 13.9% (7.4% to 20.4%), 11.9% (5.1% to 18.7%), and 9.6% (2.9% to 16.3%), respectively. Beneficial effects proved substantially larger in centres with a higher rate of care escalation., Conclusion: Virtual care with RAM shows promise in improving outcomes important to patients and to optimal health system function., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04344665., Competing Interests: Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at http://www.icmje.org/disclosure-of-interest/ and declare: support from Roche, McMaster University, the Research Institute of St Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Ottawa Hospital Academic Medical Association, Queen’s University, Hamilton Health Sciences, Kingston Health Sciences, London Health Sciences, St Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, the Ottawa Hospital, and the University of Alberta Hospital for the submitted work; a financial relationship with Cloud Diagnostics Canada for purchase of devices and data plans used in this trial; and a relationship with Cloud Diagnostics Canada, which undertook training sessions for virtual nurses and perioperative doctors and surgeons on how to use their technology., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: After nonelective (i.e., semiurgent, urgent and emergent) surgeries, patients discharged from hospitals are at risk of readmissions, emergency department visits or death. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we are undertaking the Post Discharge after Surgery Virtual Care with Remote Automated Monitoring Technology (PVC-RAM) trial to determine if virtual care with remote automated monitoring (RAM) compared with standard care will increase the number of days adult patients remain alive at home after being discharged following nonelective surgery., Methods: We are conducting a randomized controlled trial in which 900 adults who are being discharged after nonelective surgery from 8 Canadian hospitals are randomly assigned to receive virtual care with RAM or standard care. Outcome adjudicators are masked to group allocations. Patients in the experimental group learn how to use the study's tablet computer and RAM technology, which will measure their vital signs. For 30 days, patients take daily biophysical measurements and complete a recovery survey. Patients interact with nurses via the cellular modem-enabled tablet, who escalate care to preassigned and available physicians if RAM measurements exceed predetermined thresholds, patients report symptoms, a medication error is identified or the nurses have concerns they cannot resolve. The primary outcome is number of days alive at home during the 30 days after randomization., Interpretation: This trial will inform management of patients after discharge following surgery in the COVID-19 pandemic and offer insights for management of patients who undergo nonelective surgery in a nonpandemic setting. Knowledge dissemination will be supported through an online multimedia resource centre, policy briefs, presentations, peer-reviewed journal publications and media engagement., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT04344665., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CloudDX undertook training sessions for study nurses, perioperative physicians and surgeons regarding how to use their technology. David Conen has received personal fees from Servier Canada, outside of the current work. Emil Schemitsch has received personal fees from Stryker, Smith & Nephew, ITS Implants, Acumed, Swemac and DePuy Synthes, outside the present work. Emilie Belley-Cote has received grants from Bayer and Roche, outside the present work. Richard Whitlock has received grants from Bayer, Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim, an honorarium from Boehringer Ingeheim and consulting fees from AtriCure and PhaseBio, outside the present work. P.J. Devereaux has received a grant from Roche Diagnostics for the present work and grants from Abbott Diagnostics, Boehringer Ingeheim, Roche Diagnostics and Siemens, outside the present work, as well as patient monitors from Philips Healthcare and troponin assays from Siemens, outside the present work., (© 2021 Joule Inc. or its licensors.)