Search

Recent scholarship on carceral mobilities critiques conceptualizations of carceral spaces as fixed and stable, and movements within or around sites of confinement as linear and horizontal. According to this critique, criminological studies of imprisonment have typically embraced what Turner and Peters (2017) ['Rethinking mobility in criminology', Punishment & Society 19(1), 96–114] term a 'sedentarist ontology' by failing to consider the complexities of prisoner mobilities in the lived experiences of the carceral. We draw on qualitative interview data from the Prison Transparency Project, a multiyear study initially across four research sites in Canada focused on former prisoners' narratives of their carceral experiences, to identify and analyze the multifaceted mobilities that characterize prison life. We focus on three aspects of carceral mobilities: the use of psychotropic medications to produce docility, the coercive (im)mobilities of physical restraints and the 'prison on wheels' (i.e., prisoner transport vehicles). Using the concept of 'kinetic immobility', in which prisoners' bodies are immobilized so they can be coercively moved (or not) through space and time, we consider the degree to which the theoretical work on carceral mobilities aligns with lived experiences of incarceration, as narrated by research participants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An introduction to the journal is presented in which the editors discuss articles on socio-legal aspects in Canada by presenting various works of different scholars.

Drawing on research from Canada's two operating drug treatment courts, this paper explores the relationship between therapy and law, revealing a network in which expert knowledges are freed from expert actors. This uncoupling allows for the translation of the goals and interests of legal and therapeutic actors involved in the court. This uncoupling affects the ways in which both justice and therapy are imagined and articulated in these settings. While the bid to cure the criminal addict is often assumed to be a benevolent and progressive alternative to incarceration, the analysis reveals that therapeutic enterprise has decidedly punitive effects, amplifying control and erasing protections in the name of curing the offender. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Through an examination of the ways in which universities regulate student drinking on campus, this article questions the claim that governing through techniques of risk is exclusive to actuarialism and scientific knowledge. It is argued that risk is not articulated solely through actuarial knowledge. Rather, risk can be expressed through many different forms of knowledge, including 'common sense' knowledges that are completely removed from the actuarial. It is also suggested that university student substance use governing initiatives incorporate discourses of risk, reform, responsibility and self-care into their operationalization without privileging one over others. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]