1. Implementation of a Commercial Deep Learning-Based Auto Segmentation Software in Radiotherapy: Evaluation of Effectiveness and Impact on Workflow.
- Author
-
Radici, Lorenzo, Ferrario, Silvia, Borca, Valeria Casanova, Cante, Domenico, Paolini, Marina, Piva, Cristina, Baratto, Laura, Franco, Pierfrancesco, and La Porta, Maria Rosa
- Subjects
ARTIFICIAL neural networks ,PROSTATE ,PHYSICIANS ,BREAST ,DEEP learning ,CONVOLUTIONAL neural networks ,HIGH dose rate brachytherapy ,WORKFLOW ,HEAD & neck cancer - Abstract
Proper delineation of both target volumes and organs at risk is a crucial step in the radiation therapy workflow. This process is normally carried out manually by medical doctors, hence demanding timewise. To improve efficiency, auto-contouring methods have been proposed. We assessed a specific commercial software to investigate its impact on the radiotherapy workflow on four specific disease sites: head and neck, prostate, breast, and rectum. For the present study, we used a commercial deep learning-based auto-segmentation software, namely Limbus Contour (LC), Version 1.5.0 (Limbus AI Inc., Regina, SK, Canada). The software uses deep convolutional neural network models based on a U-net architecture, specific for each structure. Manual and automatic segmentation were compared on disease-specific organs at risk. Contouring time, geometrical performance (volume variation, Dice Similarity Coefficient—DSC, and center of mass shift), and dosimetric impact (DVH differences) were evaluated. With respect to time savings, the maximum advantage was seen in the setting of head and neck cancer with a 65%-time reduction. The average DSC was 0.72. The best agreement was found for lungs. Good results were highlighted for bladder, heart, and femoral heads. The most relevant dosimetric difference was in the rectal cancer case, where the mean volume covered by the 45 Gy isodose was 10.4 cm
3 for manual contouring and 289.4 cm3 for automatic segmentation. Automatic contouring was able to significantly reduce the time required in the procedure, simplifying the workflow, and reducing interobserver variability. Its implementation was able to improve the radiation therapy workflow in our department. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF