3 results on '"Hysterectomy standards"'
Search Results
2. No. 377-Hysterectomy for Benign Gynaecologic Indications.
- Author
-
Thurston J, Murji A, Scattolon S, Wolfman W, Kives S, Sanders A, and Leyland N
- Subjects
- Canada, Clinical Decision-Making, Female, Gynecology, Humans, Hysterectomy methods, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Hysterectomy standards, Uterine Diseases surgery
- Abstract
Objective: To assist physicians performing gynaecologic surgery in decision making surrounding hysterectomy for benign indications., Intended Users: Physicians, including gynaecologists, obstetricians, family physicians, general surgeons, emergency medicine specialists; nurses, including registered nurses and nurse practitioners; medical trainees, including medical students, residents, and fellows; and all other health care providers., Target Population: Adult women (18 years and older) who will undergo hysterectomy for benign gynaecologic indications., Options: The approach to hysterectomy and utility of concurrent surgical procedures are reviewed in this guideline., Evidence: For this guideline relevant studies were searched in the PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library databases. The following MeSH search terms and their variations for the last 5 years (2012-2017) were used: vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscopic hysterectomy, robotic hysterectomy, laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy, total laparoscopic hysterectomy, standard vaginal hysterectomy, and total vaginal hysterectomy., Validation Methods: The content and recommendations were drafted and agreed upon by the principal authors and members of the Gynaecology Committee. The Board of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada approved the final draft for publication. The quality of evidence was rated using the criteria described in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology framework (Tables 1 and 2). The Summary of Findings is available upon request., Benefits, Harms, and Costs: Hysterectomy is common, yet surgical practice still varies widely among gynaecologic physicians. This guideline outlines preoperative and perioperative considerations to improve the quality of care for women undergoing benign gynaecologic surgery., Guideline Update: This Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada clinical practice guideline will be automatically reviewed 5 years after publication. However, authors can propose another review date if they feel that 5 years is too short/long based on their expert knowledge of the subject matter., Sponsors: This guideline was developed with resources funded by the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada., Summary Statements: RECOMMENDATIONS., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. No. 109-Hysterectomy.
- Author
-
Lefebvre G, Allaire C, Jeffrey J, and Vilos G
- Subjects
- Canada, Female, Gynecology, Humans, Obstetrics, Societies, Medical, Hysterectomy standards
- Abstract
Objective: To identify the indications for hysterectomy, preoperative assessment, and available alternatives required prior to hysterectomy. Patient self-reported outcomes of hysterectomy have revealed high levels of patient satisfaction. These may be maximized by careful preoperative assessment and discussion of other treatment choices. In most cases hysterectomy is performed to relieve symptoms and improve quality of life. The patient's preference regarding treatment alternatives must be considered carefully., Options: The areas of clinical practice considered in formulating this guideline are preoperative assessment including alternative treatments, choice of method for hysterectomy, and evaluation of risks and benefits. The risk-to-benefit ratio must be examined individually by the woman and her health practitioners., Outcomes: Optimizing the decision-making process of women and their caregivers in proceeding with a hysterectomy having considered the disease process, and available alternative treatments and options, and having reviewed the risks and anticipated benefits., Evidence: Using Medline, PubMed, and the Cochrane Database, English language articles were reviewed from 1996 to 2001 as well as the review published in the 1996 SOGC guidelines. The level of evidence has been determined using the criteria described by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination., Benefits, Harms, and Costs: Hysterectomy is the treatment of choice for certain gynaecologic conditions. The predicted advantages must be carefully weighed against the possible risks of the surgery and other treatment alternatives. In the properly selected patient, the result from the surgery should be an improvement in the quality of life. The cost of the surgery to the health care system and to the patient must be interpreted in the context of the cost of untreated conditions. The approach selected for the hysterectomy will impact on the cost of the surgery., Recommendations: Benign Disease Preinvasive Disease Invasive Disease Acute Conditions Other Indications Surgical Approach VALIDATION: Medline searches were performed in preparing this guideline with input from experts in their field across Canada. The guideline was reviewed and accepted by SOGC Council and Executive., Sponsor: The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.