Search

Janus Kinase (JAK) inhibitors have emerged as a novel category of medications to treat a variety of immune-mediated conditions. However, limited insight exists regarding the impact of safety concerns on their usage and prescribing practices. Therefore, the objective of this study was to describe the utilization of JAK-inhibitors in Canada, both nationally and within individual provinces. We used data from IQVIA's Compuscript database. We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study of all JAK-inhibitor units dispensed in retail pharmacies (tofacitinib, ruxolitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib) within the ten Canadian provinces from July 1, 2016, to June 30, 2022. Throughout Canada, outpatient pharmacies dispensed an estimated total of 26,126,409 JAK-inhibitor units between 2016 and 2022, averaging 9,431 units dispensed per 100,000 population. All provinces had increasing rates of JAK-inhibitor units dispensed over time, whereby between July 2021 to June 2022, New Brunswick exhibited the highest rates (27,696 units per 100,000), and Prince Edward Island demonstrated the lowest rates (10,065 units per 100,000). In this study, utilization of JAK-inhibitors increased in Canada over the study period, evident at both provincial and national levels. Variability in JAK-inhibitor utilization between provinces underscores the necessity for further investigations to ascertain appropriate usage practices. Key Points • From 2016 to 2022, an estimated total of 26,126,409 JAK-inhibitor units were dispensed in retail pharmacies across Canada, with an average rate of 9,431 units dispensed for every 100,000 people in the population. • Tofacitinib was the most dispensed JAK-inhibitor during the entire study period, making up 76% of all units dispensed. Ruxolitinib, upadacitinib, and baricitinib made up 16%, 7.9%, and 1.1% of the JAK-inhibitor units dispensed, respectively. • The variance in provincial adoption of JAK-inhibitors across Canada might be influenced by several factors, including drug coverage availability, disease prevalence, and physician prescribing patterns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Canada is known to have a complex pathway for new drug approval and reimbursement, resulting in delayed access for patients with serious and life-threatening diseases, such as cancer. Several recent publications from key stakeholders, including patients, physicians and policymakers, highlight patient helplessness, physician frustrations and policymakers entangled in a massive network of bureaucracy unable to make headway. Several quantitative and qualitative assessments using time from regulatory approvals to successful reimbursements confirm long review times and high rejection rates for oncology drugs, especially those receiving conditional approvals. A consensus forum of 18 Canadian oncology clinicians recently voiced frustration with the process and inability to deliver guideline-supported efficacious therapies to their patients. This manuscript compares data extracted from publicly available data sources from 2019 to June 2024 to previous publications. Methods: Public databases from Health Canada, the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), which is in the process of changing to Canada's Drug Agency, and the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA) were reviewed and the data collected were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Results: From the data, three trends emerge, (i) an increasing number of oncology drugs are receiving conditional approvals from Health Canada, (ii) the percentage of conditionally approved oncology drugs receiving positive reimbursement recommendations from CADTH is still low but appears to be improving, but delays in access are now contingent upon pCPA deciding whether to negotiate price and then the duration of any negotiation, and (iii) real-world evidence is no longer part of the decision-making for conditional approvals. A slight increase in the positive endorsement of RWE used to support CADTH recommendations was observed. Conclusions: The lack of timely access to oncology drugs hurts Canadian patients. While a small trend of improvement appears to be emerging, longer-term data collection is required to ensure sustained patient benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drug exceptional access programs (DEAPs) exist across Canada to address gaps in access to pharmaceuticals. These programs circumvent standard procedures, raising epistemic, economic, social and political issues. This commentary provides insights into these issues by revealing the context and procedures on which these programs depend. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Canada has one of the most complex and rigorous drug approval and public reimbursement processes and is, unfortunately, one of the countries with the longest delays in drug access. To assess the overall impact of systemic delays in access to cancer therapy, a targeted literature review (TLR) was performed to identify studies associated with the clinical, economic, and quality of life impacts of delayed access to oncology drugs. Using MEDLINE/PubMed databases and snowballing, four unique records met the eligibility criteria. Results revealed that clinical outcomes were the most impacted by systemic delays in access to oncology drugs (e.g., life years lost, overall survival, and progression-free survival). The four articles retrieved by the TLR specifically illustrated that a substantial number of life years could potentially be saved by increasing systemic efficiency regarding the development, approval, and reimbursement processes of new drugs for advanced malignancies. It is imperative that initiatives are put in place to improve the performance and speed of Canadian drug regulatory and health technology assessment (HTA) processes, especially for new cancer therapeutics. The proposed solutions in this paper include better coordination between HTA and Canadian payers to harmonize coverage decisions, international collaborations, information sharing, and national standards for timeliness in oncology drug access. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune disease characterized by low platelet counts and increased risk of bleeding. After corticosteroids with or without intravenous immune globulin (first-line treatment), second-line treatment options include rituximab, splenectomy, thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), and fostamatinib. In Canada, the choice of second-line therapy is influenced by access to medications. The goals of this narrative review are to 1) summarize the evidence for the use of TPO-RAs and other second-line therapies in ITP and 2) highlight differences in public funding criteria for TPO-RAs across provinces and territories in Canada. Methods: We conducted a literature review of second-line therapies for ITP. We solicited information on public funding programs for TPO-RAs in Canada from health care providers, pharmacists, and provincial ministries of health. Results: Head-to-head trials involving TPO-RAs, rituximab, splenectomy, and fostamatinib are lacking. There is substantial evidence of effect for TPO-RAs in improving platelet count levels, health-related quality of life, bleeding, and fatigue from placebo-controlled trials and observational studies; however, access to TPO-RAs through provincial funding programs in Canada is variable. Splenectomy failure is a prerequisite for the funding of TPO-RAs in Ontario, Manitoba, and Saskatchewan, but not in Alberta or Quebec. Other provinces either do not have access to public funding or funding is provided on a case-by-case basis. Discussion: TPO-RAs are effective second-line therapies for the treatment of ITP; however, access is variable across Canada, which results in health disparities and poor uptake of international treatment guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pregnant people who use unregulated drugs (PPWUD) are at high risk of health complications yet experience a range of barriers to sexual and reproductive health care. Given that improving maternal health and access to reproductive health care are key targets underpinning the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), there is an urgent need to improve access to appropriate supports and services for this population. Little is known about what programs and practices exist to support PPWUD's access to sexual and reproductive health care. This scoping review aimed to identify the available literature on these programs and practices in Canada. Methods: A scoping review was conducted using JBI methodology and reported using PRISMA guidelines. Scholarly databases and grey literature sources were searched to identify literature published between 2016–2023 in English or French that discussed, defined, conceptualised, or evaluated programs and practices that support PPWUD's access to sexual and reproductive health care in Canada. Identified literature was screened using Covidence. Data were extracted from included texts, then analysed descriptively. Frequencies and key concepts were reported. Results: A total of 71 articles were included, most of which were grey literature. Of the total, 46 unique programs were identified, as well as several useful practices. Most programs were in urban centres in Western Canada, and most programs offered holistic 'wrap-around services.' Several programs delivered these services on-site or as 'drop-in' programs with the support of staff with lived/living experience of substance use. Most frequent program outcomes included keeping parents and children together, improving connection to other services, and reducing substance use harms. Noted helpful practices included non-judgmental care and the use of harm-reduction strategies. Conclusions: Several programs and practices that support PPWUD exist in Canada, though few focus exclusively on sexual and reproductive health. There remain opportunities to improve access to programs, including expanding geographic availability and range of services. The review has clinical application by providing an overview of available programs that may support clinicians in identifying services for PPWUD. Future research should consider client perspectives and experiences of these programs. Review registration number: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/5y64j. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

When combined with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and immunosuppression, upfront universal administration of caplacizumab was shown to be effective in the management of immune thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (iTTP). However, access to this drug remains challenging in many jurisdictions. We retrospectively review results of a single-institution experience with caplacizumab over a 3-year period. During the study period, we treated 48 patients with iTTP, of which 11 (23%) received caplacizumab. Eight of these 11 patients (73%) were female; the median age was 45 years (IQR 37.0-58.5). All received TPE within 24 h of admission (median 9 exchanges, IQR 7.0-12.5), and high-dose steroids. Caplacizumab was initiated for a median of 6 days after admission (IQR 2.5-8.0) and continued for a median of 26 days (IQR 14.0-33.0). Five patients (45%) had refractory disease at caplacizumab initiation. Ten patients (91%) survived, reaching clinical remission. Platelet normalization was reached with a median of 4 days following caplacizumab initiation (IQR 1.5-4.0). Complications included minor bleeding (n = 1) and local allergic reaction (n = 1). No patients experienced TTP exacerbation; relapse occurred in two patients (18%) over 1-5 years of follow-up. Caplacizumab appeared to be effective and safe, despite delayed initiation and in the setting of refractory disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE Over the past decade a number of effective but costly drugs have entered the therapeutic arena. Ethical and logistical challenges associated with including children in research and policy have produced variability in public policy on funding pediatric drugs, with inconsistent coverage across Canada. The purpose of this study was to explore the processes for funding high-cost pediatric drugs in Canadian children's hospitals. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional, text-based survey of all 19 chairs of Canadian departments of pediatrics about the funding and accessibility of high-cost drugs. Thematic qualitative analysis was performed to organize, sort, and code verbatim written responses and follow-up correspondence. RESULTS Responses were received from all 19 Canadian departments of pediatrics surveyed (100% response rate). Three major themes emerged about pediatric high-cost drug policies: inconsistency between funding processes, variability in funding sources, and frustration with the current system. In aggregate, a clear concern emerged that current funding options were heterogenous and inadequate to meet patient needs. CONCLUSIONS There was widespread consensus from respondents that current options for funding pediatric high-cost drugs were inadequate and that there was need for urgent action to address this problem. Policy changes are needed to sustain and improve access to high-cost drugs for Canadian children. We propose 3 solutions, including the creation of a national framework for funding high-cost pediatric drugs, increased incorporation of pediatric considerations in drug research and development, and a multidisciplinary drug summit on pediatric therapeutics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In Canada, public insurance for physician and hospital services, without cost-sharing, is provided to all residents. Outpatient prescription drug coverage, however, is provided through a patchwork system of public and private plans, often with substantial cost-sharing, which leaves many underinsured or uninsured. We conducted a systematic review to examine the association of drug insurance and cost-sharing with drug use, health services use, and health in Canada. We searched 4 electronic databases, 2 grey literature databases, 5 specialty journals, and 2 working paper repositories. At least 2 reviewers independently screened articles for inclusion, extracted characteristics, and assessed risk of bias. The expansion of drug insurance was associated with increases in drug use, individuals who reported drug insurance generally reported higher drug use, and increases in and higher levels of drug cost-sharing were associated with lower drug use. Although a number of studies found statistically significant associations between drug insurance or cost-sharing and health services use, the magnitudes of these associations were generally fairly small. Among 5 studies that examined the association of drug insurance and cost-sharing with health outcomes, 1 found a statistically significant and clinically meaningful association. We did not find that socioeconomic status or sex were effect modifiers; there was some evidence that health modified the association between drug insurance and cost-sharing and drug use. Increased cost-sharing is likely to reduce drug use. Universal pharmacare without cost-sharing may reduce inequities because it would likely increase drug use among lower-income populations relative to higher-income populations. • There is a gap in the literature pertaining to the effects of drug insurance and cost-sharing in a Canadian context. • We conducted a systematic review of Canadian studies and found that there was consistent evidence that the expansion of drug insurance was associated with meaningful increases in drug use, that individuals who reported drug insurance coverage generally reported higher drug use relative to those who reported no coverage, and that increases in and higher levels of drug cost-sharing were associated with lower use. • Universal pharmacare without cost-sharing may reduce inequities in access to essential drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Unlike other high-income countries, Canada has no national policy for drugs treating rare diseases (orphan drugs). Nevertheless, in 2022, the Canadian government committed to creating a national strategy to make access to these drugs more consistent. Our aim was to study whether recommendations made by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health (CADTH) translated into coverage decisions for orphan drugs in Ontario, the largest Canadian province. This study is the first to look at this question for orphan drugs, which are at the center of policy attention. We included 155 orphan drug-indication pairs approved and marketed in Canada between October 2002 and April 2022. Cohen's kappa was used to test the agreement across health technology assessment (HTA) recommendations and coverage decisions in Ontario. Logistic regression was used to test which factors, relevant to decision-makers, might be associated with funding in Ontario. We found only fair agreement between CADTH's recommendations and coverage decisions in Ontario. Although a positive and statistically significant association between favorable HTA recommendations and coverage was found, more than half of the drugs with a negative HTA recommendation were available in Ontario, predominately through specialized funds. Successful pan-Canadian pricing negotiations were a strong predictor of coverage in Ontario. Despite efforts to harmonize access to drugs across Canada, considerable room for improvement remains. Introducing a national strategy for orphan drugs could help increase transparency, consistency, promote collaborations, and make access to orphan drugs a national priority. • Recommendations by the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health do not always translate to provincial coverage decisions for new drugs. • We explored whether Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technology in Health's recommendations are aligned with coverage decisions for orphan drugs in Ontario. • Negative health technology assessment recommendations did not necessarily translate to no pan-Canadian pricing negotiations. • More than half the drugs with negative health technology assessment recommendations were available in Ontario through specialized funds. • A national strategy for orphan drugs could prioritize access to these treatments at a national level and harmonize access, at least to some extent, across Canada. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Some brand drug companies have stymied attempts by generic drug companies to obtain samples of brand drugs needed to develop and gain regulatory approval for their generic products. This conduct, which has been reported in both the US and Canada, raises drug costs to drug plans and other payors and can lessen competition. The literature to date contains little empirical evidence on the prevalence of this conduct, the attendant effects on generic drug market launches and costs incurred by drug payors. This paper addresses these questions for Canada, using data on the drug development projects undertaken by the members of the Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association over the period 2015–2019. I found that about 16% of generic drug development projects were delayed due to originator firm efforts to impede access to samples of their drugs. The median generic drug launch delay (among affected drugs) attributable to the challenged conduct was 6 months. The additional costs to drug payors from the resulting delays in generic drug launches over the analysis period was in the order of $284 million, or $57 million annually. This study did not explore the additional generic drug development costs attributable to the challenged conduct. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Despite successes in the development of innovative anticancer therapies, the fiscal and capacity restraints of the Canadian public healthcare system result in challenges with drug access. A meaningful proportion of systemic therapies ultimately do not receive public funding despite supporting clinical evidence. In this study, we assessed Canadian medical oncologists' current attitudes toward discussing publicly unfunded cancer treatments with patients and predictors of different practices. Methods: A web-based survey consisting of multiple choice and case-based scenarios was distributed to medical oncologists identified through the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada directory. Results: A total of 116 responses were received. Almost all respondents reported discussing publicly unfunded treatments, including those who did so for Health Canada (HC) approved treatments (50%) and those who discussed off-label treatments (i.e., not HC approved) as guided by national guidelines (48%). Respondents in practice for over 15 years versus less than 5 years (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.04-0.50, p = 0.002) and those who worked in a community practice versus comprehensive cancer center (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.91, p = 0.04) were significantly less likely to discuss off-label treatment options with their patients. Almost half of respondents (47%) indicated that their institution did not permit the administration of unfunded treatments. Conclusions: There is variability in medical oncologists' practices when it comes to discussing unfunded therapies. Given the limitations within Canada's publicly funded healthcare system, physicians are faced with the challenge of navigating an increasingly complex balance between patient care and available resources. Engagement of relevant stakeholders and policy makers is crucial in the continued evaluation of Canada's drug funding process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drug coverage in Canada is a patchwork; an inequitable inefficient and unsustainable patchwork with no coherence or purpose. Some people think that we can solve the problem by adding more patches, but the core of the problem is that it is a patchwork. For the working population, access to medicines is still organized as privileges offered by employers to their employees. Universal pharmacare would not only provide better access to needed prescription drugs, but also eliminate waste, ensure value-for-money and help improve drug safety and appropriate prescribing. Opponents fear that a universal pharmacare plan would ration drugs, and impede drug access for some patients. However, these claims misunderstand the reality of drug coverage, pricing and access. Opponents propose, instead, to "fill the gap" of current drug coverage by implementing catastrophic coverage, which would serve commercial interests without maximizing health outcomes for the Canadian population. In spite of overwhelming evidence and consensus in the academic community in favour of universal pharmacare, the battle is far from over. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pharmaceutical industry representatives and public drug plan managers hold competing visions of drug access, ones I theorize as "fast" and "slow" care paces. The relationship between free market imaginaries and population-based biopolitics is negotiated through these paces from within the flexible political category of rare disease. In this article, I explore expensive rare disease drug access in Canada's universal health system through a temporal lens. I show how two families navigate these powerful negotiations, asserting themselves as deserving of resources while finding ways to consider life and death outside of this clash between health system pragmatics and pharmaceutical promise. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the private-public drug insurance system implemented by Quebec. Topics explored include the improved medicine access of working-age Quebec residents, brief details about its development, structure, and challenges faced such as the opposition of insurance and pharmacy sectors, and the comparison of cost-related non-adherence to prescription medications in Quebec, Australia, and New Zealand.

The article calls for the establishment of a public policy on funding for pediatric drugs in Canada. Issues and concerns discussed are limitations of the processes for appraising child health technologies including drug licensing, funding and market dynamics, conceptual challenges to applying health technology assessment to child health, and creation of a cohesive national framework to guide policy-making on access to drugs for children.

Background: Substance use management in hospitals can be challenging. In response, a Canadian hospital opened an overdose prevention site (OPS) where community members and hospital inpatients can inject pre-obtained illicit drugs under supervision. This study aims to: (1) describe program utilization patterns; (2) characterize OPS visits; and (3) evaluate overdose events and related outcomes.Methods: A retrospective chart review was completed at one hospital in Vancouver, Canada. All community members and hospital inpatients who visited the OPS between May 2018 and July 2019 were included. Client measures included: hospital inpatient status, use of intravenous access line for drug injection, and substances used. Program measures included: number of visits (daily/monthly), overdose (fatal/non-fatal) events and overdose-related outcomes.Results: Overall, 11,673 OPS visits were recorded. Monthly visits increased from 306 to 1198 between May 2018 and July 2019 respectively. On average, 26 visits occurred daily. Among all visits, 20% reported being a hospital inpatient, and 5% reported using a hospital intravenous access line for drug injection. Opioids (56%) and stimulants (24%) were the most common substances used. Overall 39 overdose events occurred - 82% required naloxone reversal, 28% required transfer to the hospital's emergency department and none were fatal. Overdose events were more common among hospital inpatients compared to community clients (6.6 vs 2.2 per 1000 visits respectively; p value = 0.046).Conclusions: This unique OPS is an example of a hospital-based harm reduction initiative. Use of the site increased over time among both groups with no fatal overdose events occurring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article looks at the politics behind Canada's Access to Medicines Regime (CAMR), a legislative amendment that permits compulsory licensing for the production and export of medicines to developing countries. It is mentioned that only two orders of antiretroviral drugs, enough for 21,000 HIV/AIDS patients in Rwanda have been exported, since its release in 2004. It is suggested that increased input from the developing country beneficiaries may lead to policies that provide affordable drugs.

Background: In 2001 Health Canada responded to a series of Ontario court decisions by creating the Marihuana Medical Access Division (MMAD) and the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations (MMAR). Although Health Canada has conducted a small number of stakeholder consultations, the federal government has never polled federally authorized cannabis patients. This study is an attempt to learn more about patient needs, challenges and experiences with the MMAD. Methods: Launched in the spring of 2007, Quality of Service Assessment of Health Canada's Medical Cannabis Policy and Program pairs a 50 question online survey addressing the personal experiences of patients in the federal cannabis program with 25 semi-guided interviews. Data gathering for this study took place from April 2007 to Jan. 2008, eventually garnering survey responses from 100 federally-authorized users, which at the time represented about 5% of the patients enrolled in Health Canada's program. This paper presents the results of the survey portion of the study. Results: 8% of respondents report getting their cannabis from Health Canada, while 66% grow it for themselves. >50% report that they frequent compassion clubs or dispensaries, which remain illegal and unregulated in Canada. 81% of patients would chose certified organic methods of cultivation; >90% state that not all strains are equally effective at relieving symptoms, and 97% would prefer to obtain cannabis from a source where multiple strains are available. Of the 48 patients polled that had tried the Health Canada cannabis supply, >75% rank it as either "1" or "2" on a scale of 1-10 (with "1" being "very poor", and 10 being "excellent"). Discussion: 72% of respondents report they are either "somewhat" or "totally unsatisfied" with Canada's medical cannabis program. These survey results and relevant court decisions suggest that the MMAR are not meeting the needs of most of the nation's medical cannabis patient community. It is hoped this research will help inform policy changes that will better address the needs of Canada's critically and chronically ill medical cannabis patient population, including the integration of community-based dispensaries into this novel healthcare delivery model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The examines the reasons for the failure of the Canada's Access to Medicine Regime (CAMR), a strategy designed to allow Canada to establish compulsory licenses in the export of essential medicines.. It highlights the case involving Rwanda and the Canadian drug company Apotex Inc. which is considered as the only situation in which CAMR became workable yet limited because of the incompetence of the company. According to the author, one reason for the failure of CAMR is the fact that Canada's generics are among the most expensive generics in the world especially when compared to the prices in the U.S. and New Zealand. It also emphasizes that the prime concern of the generic companies' incompliance to CAMR is because of the pricing and not because of patents.

The article examines the efficiency of the Canadian Access to Medicines Regime (CAMR). It states that Rwanda was the first country to import medicines under the WTO General Council Decision 2003. It argues that the proposed amendment of the Paragraph 6 Decision is premature because of the state legislation that does not create an enabling environment for developing countries to acquire essential medicines.

The article reports on the impact of the decision of the Canadian government to change rules on prescribing abortion drug on women's access to medical abortion. Topics mentioned include the authority of health personnel to prescribe and dispense the drug, some barriers faced by women to access to medical abortion such as gaps in coverage for ultrasounds or abortions outside of hospitals, and the delay in the access of abortion services.

The author comments on drug importation from Canada to resolve the shortages of prescription drugs in the U.S. The topics discussed include the legislation proposed in the U.S. to allow prescription drug importation from Canada, the implications of the said proposal to the shortages of prescription drugs in Canada, and the need for American politicians to directly address access to unfordable prescription directly.

The article discusses the debate about the public drug coverage in Canada as of November 2015. Topics discussed include the prices of prescription drugs in Canada, poor access to medicines by Canadians, an overview of proposed universal pharmacare solutions since the 1960s and percentage of private insurance in drug spending.

The author discusses aspects of fair access to cancer drugs in Canada and Great Britain. Topics include the Canada Health Act aims to provide reasonable access to country's health services without financial barriers, the Cancer Drugs Fund (CDF) established by the government of England in 2010 that provides acces to the drugs, and the challenges faced by Canadian healthcare system and the National Health Service (NHS) in England.

The authors discuss the effectiveness of tamper-resistant drug formulations being implemented in Canada and in the U.S. The authors state that the tamper-resistant opioid formulations was designed to control the growing number of drug addiction and overdose cases. The article also discusses the use of narcotics in Canada, prevalence of oxycodone, and availability of prescribed opioids.

The article reports on the advocacy prominent Canadians, including Dr. James Orbinski, Stephen Lewis, and Dr. Samantha Nutt, to federal Parliamentarians. It states that they vote on December 1, 2009 in favor of a bill that reforms legislation directed to supply affordable life-saving drugs to the developing world. A survey accredited by the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) Canada and the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Networks shows that many Canadians support the changes being proposed.