Search

Objectives: To estimate Canadian population norms (health utility values, summary component scores and domain scores) for the VR-12., Methods: English and French speaking Canadians aged 18 and older completed an online survey that included sociodemographic questions and standardized health status instruments, including the VR-12. Responses to the VR-12 were summarized as: (i) a health utility value; (ii) mental and physical component summary scores (MCS and PCS, respectively), and (iii) eight domain scores. Norms were calculated for the full sample and by gender, age group, and province/territory (univariate), and for several multivariate stratifications (e.g., age group and gender). Results were summarized using descriptive statistics, including number of respondents, mean and standard deviation (SD), median and percentiles (25th and 75th), and minimum and maximum., Results: A total of 6761 people who clicked on the survey link completed the survey (83.4% completion rate), of whom 6741 (99.7%) were included in the analysis. The mean health utility score was 0.698 (SD = 0.216). Mean health utility scores tended to be higher in older age groups, ranging from 0.661 (SD = 0.214) in those aged 18-29 to 0.728 (SD = 0.310) in those aged 80+. Average MCS scores were higher in older age groups, while PCS scores were lower. Females consistently reported lower mean health utility values, summary component scores and domain scores compared with males., Conclusions: This is the first study to present Canadian norms for the VR-12. Health utility norms can serve as a valuable input for Canadian economic models, while summary component and domain norms can help interpret routinely-collected data., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objectives : Measuring the perceived mental and physical health status of older adults living in long-term residential care (LTRC) is central to patient-centered care. This study examined the qualitative content validity of the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12) for LTRC and, based on the findings, the authors developed an adapted version of the generic patient-reported outcome measure for this population. Methods : Content validity was evaluated in two steps: (1) initial resident feedback (n = 9) and research team consensus discussions and (2) cognitive interviews with residents (n = 18) and a research team consensus discussion. The cognitive interviews examined comprehension, acceptability, and relevance of the VR-12 items. Results : Two VR-12 items had limited acceptability in the LTRC setting, the reference to " work " in items was irrelevant to residents, and the lack of a frame of reference (" During the past week … ") impacted comprehension of several items. Conclusions : Study findings informed the development of an adapted version of the VR-12 for older adults living in Canadian LTRC homes and provided content validity evidence regarding its relevance and appropriateness for this population. Clinical implications : Measuring the health status of older adults living in LTRC can help to monitor changes in health status over time and support person-centered care.

Objectives: To (1) estimate the relative value of older adults' healthcare experiences based on the Canadian Patient Experience Survey for Inpatient Care (CPES-IC) using an economic valuation technique, and (2) compare the results with those of a conventional key-driver analysis of healthcare experiences based on bivariate correlations., Study Design and Setting: An online survey of 1,074 Canadians aged 60 and older who had been hospitalized within five years. Participants completed the CPES-IC and a best-worst scaling (BWS) valuation task. BWS data were analyzed using a conditional logit model. These results were compared to a conventional key-driver analysis that estimates importance through Spearman's correlations between experiences and a global rating of overall experience., Results: The valuation approach found that the three experiences most valued by patients were: that staff seemed informed and up-to-date about their hospital care, doctors explained things in a way that they could understand, and that they got all the information they needed about their care and treatment. Three of the top five most valued experiences from the valuation approach were among the top five in the key driver analysis. However, there were noteworthy differences in rank order., Conclusion: The results of the valuation exercise can inform local and/or system level quality improvement efforts by identifying priorities from an economic evaluation point of view, which are different than those based on a conventional key-driver analysis. Given the degree of uncertainty in estimates both the rank order and confidence intervals should be used to guide decision-making., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (pros) are essential to capture the patient's perspective and to influence care. Although pros and pro measures are known to have many important benefits, they are not consistently being used and there is there no Canadian pros oversight. The Position Statement presented here is the first step toward supporting the implementation of pros in the Canadian health care setting., Methods: The Canadian pros National Steering Committee drafted position statements, which were submitted for stakeholder feedback before, during, and after the first National Canadian Patient Reported Outcomes (canpros) scientific conference, 14-15 November 2019 in Calgary, Alberta. In addition to the stakeholder feedback cycle, a patient advocate group submitted a section to capture the patient voice., Results: The canpros Position Statement is an outcome of the 2019 canpros scientific conference, with an oncology focus. The Position Statement is categorized into 6 sections covering 4 theme areas: Patient and Families, Health Policy, Clinical Implementation, and Research. The patient voice perfectly mirrors the recommendations that the experts reached by consensus and provides an overriding impetus for the use of pros in health care., Conclusions: Although our vision of pros transforming the health care system to be more patient-centred is still aspirational, the Position Statement presented here takes a first step toward providing recommendations in key areas to align Canadian efforts. The Position Statement is directed toward a health policy audience; future iterations will target other audiences, including researchers, clinicians, and patients. Our intent is that future versions will broaden the focus to include chronic diseases beyond cancer., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES We have read and understood Current Oncology’s policy on disclosing conflicts of interest, and with the exceptions of the authors listed below, we declare that we have none or were unable to respond to the request for disclosures because of covid-19–related activities. LB has received an honorarium from Genentech and travel support from Elekta. AFK has received consulting fees from Allergan. RO has received grant funding from Varian Medical Systems., (2020 Multimed Inc.)

Effective medication delivery to inmates within correctional facilities is essential for managing symptoms, preventing relapse, slowing disease progression, and enabling recovery. Despite its importance, medication adherence in correctional facilities is poor. This mixed methods study explores the factors that affect medication adherence from the perspective of 20 inmates at a provincial remand center in Alberta, Canada. Themes describing factors that promote or hinder medication adherence emerged: patient-related factors (addiction, social support, insight into disease, and purpose of medications), health care provider-related factors (health care provider attributes and trust in physicians), and correctional setting factors. The findings of this study inform recommendations to improve medication adherence and disease management in correctional facilities.