Search

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Bioethics / Revue canadienne de bioéthique is the property of Ecole de Sante Publique de l'Universite de Montreal and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: Interhospital transfer for patients with stroke due to large vessel occlusion for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has been associated with treatment delays., Methods: We analyzed data from Optimizing Patient Treatment in Major Ischemic Stroke With EVT, a quality improvement registry to support EVT implementation in Canada. We assessed for unadjusted differences in baseline characteristics, time metrics, and procedural outcomes between patients with large vessel occlusion transferred for EVT and those directly admitted to an EVT-capable center., Results: Between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021, a total of 6803 patients received EVT at 20 participating centers (median age, 73 years; 50% women; and 50% treated with intravenous thrombolysis). Patients transferred for EVT (n=3376) had lower rates of M2 occlusion (22% versus 27%) and higher rates of basilar occlusion (9% versus 5%) compared with those patients presenting directly at an EVT-capable center (n=3373). Door-to-needle times were shorter in patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis before transfer compared with those presenting directly to an EVT center (32 versus 36 minutes). Patients transferred for EVT had shorter door-to-arterial access times (37 versus 87 minutes) but longer last seen normal-to-arterial access times (322 versus 181 minutes) compared with those presenting directly to an EVT-capable center. No differences in arterial access-to-reperfusion times, successful reperfusion rates (85% versus 86%), or adverse periprocedural events were found between the 2 groups. Patients transferred to EVT centers had a similar likelihood for good functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2; 41% versus 43%; risk ratio, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.88-1.01]; adjusted risk ratio, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.91-1.05]) and a higher risk for all-cause mortality at 90 days (29% versus 25%; risk ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.05-1.27]; adjusted risk ratio, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.03-1.28]) compared with patients presenting directly to an EVT center., Conclusions: Patients transferred for EVT experience significant delays from the time they were last seen normal to the initiation of EVT., Competing Interests: Alexandre Poppe reports grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, compensation from Roche for other services, and grants from the Fondation Brain Canada, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, and Stryker. Dr Swartz reports grants from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, compensation from the Sunnybrook Research Institute for other services, compensation from F. Hoffmann-La Roche for consultant services, stock holdings in FollowMD, Inc, and grants from the Ontario Brain Institute and the National Institutes of Health. Dr Catanese reports compensation from Hoffmann-La Roche Limited for consultant services, employment by Hamilton Health Sciences, and grants from Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC. Dr Volders reports compensation from Penumbra, Inc, for consultant services. Dr Kelly reports compensation from Johnson and Johnson, Penumbra, Inc, and Medtronic Vascular, Inc, for consultant services. Dr Kamal reports stock holdings in DESTINE Health and compensation from Medtronic for consultant services. Dr Yu reports grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Dr Hill reports grants from NoNO, Inc, and Medtronic, compensation from Brainsgate Ltd for consultant services, grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Medtronic, Boehringer Ingelheim, Medtronic, and MicroVention, Inc, and compensation from Merck for end point review committee services. Dr Sharma reports grants from Bristol Myers Squibb Company to others and compensation from Bayer and AstraZeneca for consultant services. Dr Demchuk reports compensation from Hoffmann-La Roche Limited for consultant services, compensation from Lumosa for data and safety monitoring services, a patent issued for Stroke imaging software licensed to Circle NVI, compensation from Boehringer Ingelheim for consultant services, compensation from Novo Nordisk AS for other services, compensation from Philips for data and safety monitoring services, compensation from NovaSignal for consultant services, and stock holdings in Circle NVI.

Background: Recent evidence from thrombolysis trials indicates the noninferiority of intravenous tenecteplase to intravenous alteplase with respect to good functional outcomes in patients with acute stroke. We examined whether the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of patients with acute stroke differs by the type of thrombolysis treatment received. In addition, we examined the association between the modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1 and HRQOL and patient-reported return to prebaseline stroke functioning at 90 days., Methods: Data were from all patients included in the AcT trial (Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase), a pragmatic, registry-linked randomized trial comparing tenecteplase with alteplase. HRQOL at 90-day post-randomization was assessed using the 5-item EuroQOL questionnaire (EQ5D), which consists of 5 items and a visual analog scale (VAS). EQ5D index values were estimated from the EQ5D items using the time tradeoff approach based on Canadian norms. Tobit regression and quantile regression models were used to evaluate the adjusted effect of tenecteplase versus alteplase treatment on the EQ5D index values and VAS score, respectively. The association between return to prebaseline stroke functioning and the modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1 and HRQOL was quantified using correlation coefficient ( r ) with 95% CI., Results: Of 1577 included in the intention-to-treat analysis patients, 1503 (95.3%) had complete data on the EQ5D. Of this, 769 (51.2%) were administered tenecteplase and 717 (47.7%) were female. The mean EQ5D VAS score and EQ5D index values were not significantly higher for those who received intravenous tenecteplase compared with those who received intravenous alteplase ( P =0.10). Older age ( P <0.01), more severe stroke assessed using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale ( P <0.01), and longer stroke onset-to-needle time ( P =0.004) were associated with lower EQ5D index and VAS scores. There was a strong association ( r , 0.85 [95% CI, 0.81-0.89]) between patient-reported return to prebaseline functioning and modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 1 Similarly, there was a moderate association between return to prebaseline functioning and EQ5D index ( r , 0.45 [95% CI, 0.40-0.49]) and EQ5D VAS scores ( r , 0.42 [95% CI, 0.37-0.46])., Conclusions: Although there is no differential effect of thrombolysis type on patient-reported global HRQOL and EQ 5D-5L index values in patients with acute stroke, sex- and age-related differences in HRQOL were noted in this study., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03889249., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Menon reports stock in Circle NVI and patents for systems of triage in acute stroke. Dr Sajobi reports consulting fees received from Circle NVI and employment at the University of Calgary. Dr Almekhlafi reports to be on the medical advisory board of Palmera Medical, Inc. Dr Deschaintre reports being part of the Association des neurologues du Québec, the Société des Sciences Vasculaires du Québec, and the Université de Montréal. Dr Coutts reports that Boehringer Ingelheim provided a study drug (tenecteplase) for the TEMPO-2 trial. Dr Catanese reports employment with Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University, consulting fees from Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, and a grant/contract from Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC. Dr Field reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca Canada, Bayer, HLS Therapeutics, and Roche; stock and being a fiduciary officer (board member) in Destine Health; grants/contracts from Boehringer Ingelheim and Bayer; and being an expert witness for the Canadian Medical Protective Association. Dr Siddiqui reports a grant/contract from Allergan and other interests from Bayer and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Demchuk reports stock in Circle NVI and patents for stroke imaging software; consulting fees from Servier Pharmaceuticals LLC, NovaSignal, Boehringer Ingelheim, HLS Therapeutics, Inc, Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, and Medtronic; data and safety monitoring with Philips; and other interests from AstraZeneca Canada, Novo Nordisk AS, and Pfizer Canada, Inc. Dr Hill reports employment with the University of Calgary; consulting fees from Brainsgate Ltd; grants/contracts from Biogen, Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Medtronic, MicroVention, Inc, and NoNO, Inc; being part of the end point review committee at Merck; stock in Circle NVI; and patents for systems of triage in acute stroke. Dr Poppe reports grant funding from the Fondation Brain Canada and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada and research funding from Stryker. Dr Swartz reports stock in FollowMD, Inc, and grants/contracts from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the National Institutes of Health, the Ontario Brain Institute, and the Sunnybrook Research Institute. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Understanding sex differences in stroke care is important in reducing potential disparities. Our objective was to explore sex differences in workflow efficiency, treatment efficacy, and safety in the AcT trial (Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase)., Methods: AcT was a multicenter, registry-linked randomized noninferiority trial comparing tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg) with alteplase (0.9 mg/kg) in acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 hours of onset. In this post hoc analysis, baseline characteristics, workflow times, successful reperfusion (extended Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-1), and 90-day mortality were compared by sex. Mixed-effects regression analysis was used adjusting for age, stroke severity, and occlusion site for outcomes., Results: Of 1577 patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (2019-2022), 755 (47.9%) were women. Women were older (median, 77 [68-86] years in women versus 70 [59-79] years in men) and had a higher proportion of severe strokes (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score >15; 32.4% versus 24.9%) and large vessel occlusions (28.7% versus 21.5%) compared with men. All workflow times were comparable between sexes. Women were less likely to achieve functional independence (31.7% versus 39.8%; unadjusted relative risk, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.70-0.91]) and had higher mortality (17.7% versus 13.3%; unadjusted relative risk, 1.33 [95% CI, 1.06-1.69]). Adjusted analysis showed no difference in outcomes between sexes., Conclusions: Differences in prognostic factors of age, stroke severity, and occlusion site largely accounted for higher functional dependence and mortality in women. No sex disparities were apparent in workflow quality indicators. Given the integration of the AcT trial into clinical practice, these results provide reassurance that no major sex biases are apparent in acute stroke management throughout participating Canadian centers., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03889249., Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Field reports compensation from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS-Pfizer, HLS Therapeutics, and Roche for consultant services, the Canadian Medical Protective Association as an expert witness, a grant from Bayer, and is on the board of DESTINE Health. Dr Menon reports stock options in Circle CVI and has consulted for Hoffman-Laroche and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Coutts is a principal investigator for the TEMPO-2 trial (A Randomized Controlled Trial of TNK-tPA Versus Standard of Care for Minor Ischemic Stroke With Proven Occlusion) with the study drug (tenecteplase) provided by Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Hill reports compensation from BrainsGate for consultant services, grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Medtronic, MicroVention, Inc, and NoNo, Inc, end point review committee work for Merck, and employment as a professor with the University of Calgary. Dr Poppe reports grants from Stryker, Fondation Brain Canada, and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Dr Demchuk reports compensation from Boehringer Ingelheim, HLS Therapeutics, Hoffman-Laroche, Medtronic, NovaSignal, and Servier for consultant services, others from AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, and Pfizer, data safety monitoring board participation with Philips, and stock and patent for stroke imaging software with Circle NVI. Dr Catanese reports compensation from Hoffman-Laroche for consultant fees and a grant from Servier. Dr Yu reports grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Dr Deschaintre reports other compensation from the Association des neurologues du Québec, the Société des Sciences Vasculaires du Québec, and the Université du Montréal. Dr Siddiqui reports a grant from Allergan and other compensation from Bayer and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Swartz reports grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, the National Institutes of Health, and the Sunnybrook Research Institute and stock in FollowMD, Inc. The other authors report no conflicts.

Background: Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase bolus followed by infusion is a global standard of care for patients with acute ischaemic stroke. We aimed to determine whether tenecteplase given as a single bolus might increase reperfusion compared with this standard of care., Methods: In this multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, registry-linked, randomised, controlled trial (AcT), patients were enrolled from 22 primary and comprehensive stroke centres across Canada. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 18 years or older, with a diagnosis of ischaemic stroke causing disabling neurological deficit, presenting within 4·5 h of symptom onset, and eligible for thrombolysis per Canadian guidelines. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using a previously validated minimal sufficient balance algorithm to balance allocation by site and a secure real-time web-based server, to either intravenous tenecteplase (0·25 mg/kg to a maximum of 25 mg) or alteplase (0·9 mg/kg to a maximum of 90mg; 0·09 mg/kg as a bolus and then a 60 min infusion of the remaining 0·81 mg/kg). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who had a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1 at 90-120 days after treatment, assessed via blinded review in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all patients randomly assigned to treatment who did not withdraw consent). Non-inferiority was met if the lower 95% CI of the difference in the proportion of patients who met the primary outcome between the tenecteplase and alteplase groups was more than -5%. Safety was assessed in all patients who received any of either thrombolytic agent and who were reported as treated. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03889249, and is closed to accrual., Findings: Between Dec 10, 2019, and Jan 25, 2022, 1600 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to tenecteplase (n=816) or alteplase (n=784), of whom 1577 were included in the ITT population (n=806 tenecteplase; n=771 alteplase). The median age was 74 years (IQR 63-83), 755 (47·9%) of 1577 patients were female and 822 (52·1%) were male. As of data cutoff (Jan 21, 2022), 296 (36·9%) of 802 patients in the tenecteplase group and 266 (34·8%) of 765 in the alteplase group had an mRS score of 0-1 at 90-120 days (unadjusted risk difference 2·1% [95% CI - 2·6 to 6·9], meeting the prespecified non-inferiority threshold). In safety analyses, 27 (3·4%) of 800 patients in the tenecteplase group and 24 (3·2%) of 763 in the alteplase group had 24 h symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage and 122 (15·3%) of 796 and 117 (15·4%) of 763 died within 90 days of starting treatment INTERPRETATION: Intravenous tenecteplase (0·25 mg/kg) is a reasonable alternative to alteplase for all patients presenting with acute ischaemic stroke who meet standard criteria for thrombolysis., Funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Alberta Strategy for Patient Oriented Research Support Unit., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests BKM has stock options in Circle NVI and has consulted for Biogen and Boehringer Ingelheim. SBC is principal investigator of the TEMPO-2 trial, for which Boehringer Ingelheim provides the study drug (tenecteplase). LC has received payments by Servier and consulting fees from Ischaemavie RAPID, Circle NV, and Canadian Medical Protective Association. JS has a grant from Medtronic to the University of Manitoba. AMD has received consulting fees from Medtronic and honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim. LCG is on advisory boards for AstraZeneca and Servier and has stock options in AstraZenca. ASh has received consulting fees from Bayer, Servier Canada, Daiichi Sanyko Compan, AstraZeneca, VarmX, and Takeda; honoraria from Bayer and Daiichi Sankyo; is on an advisory board for Bayer; and has stock options in Ensho. MDH has received consulting fees from Sun Pharma and Brainsgate and has stock options in Circle NVI. DJG has received consulting fees from HSL Therapeutics. APo has received a project research grant from Stryker and honoraria from BMS-Pfizer. TTS has received consulting fees from Circle NVI. RHS has stock options in FollowMD and receives salary support for research from the Heart & Stroke Foundation of Canada, Sandra Black Centre for Brain Resilience & Recovery, and Ontario Brain Institute. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of this study is to understand the perceptions of new mothers using virtual care via video conferencing to gain insight into the benefits and barriers of virtual care for obstetric patients., Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 patients attending the Kingston Health Sciences Centre. The interviews were 20-25 min in length and recorded through an audio recorder. Thematic analysis was conducted in order to derive the major themes explored in this study., Results: New mothers must often adopt new routines to balance their needs and their child's needs. These routines could impact compliance and motivation to attend follow-up care. In our study, participants expressed high satisfaction with virtual care, emphasizing benefits related to comfort, convenience, communication, socioeconomic factors, and the ease of technology use. Participants also perceived that they could receive emotional support and build trust with their health care providers despite the remote nature of their care. Due to its ease of use and increased accessibility, we argue that virtual care shows promise to facilitate long-term compliance to care in obstetric patients., Conclusions: Virtual care is a useful modality that could improve compliance to obstetric care. Further research and clinical endeavours should examine how social factors and determinants intersect to determine how they underpin patient perceptions of virtual and in-person care., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Virtual care, the use of videoconferencing technology to connect with patients, has become critical in providing continuing care for patients during the current COVID-19 pandemic. Virtual care has now been adopted by health care providers across the spectrum, including physicians, residents, nurse practitioners, nurses, and allied health care professionals. Virtual care is novel and nuanced compared to in-person care. Most of the health care providers who are delivering or expected to deliver virtual care have little to no prior experience with it. The nuances of virtual care involve regulatory standards, platforms, technology and troubleshooting, patient selection, etiquette, and workflow, all of which comprise critical points in the provision of health care. It is important to consistently deliver high-quality, equitable, and professional virtual care to inspire patients with the trust they need to continue follow-up of their care in these difficult times. We have been adopting virtual care in our clinical practice for over two years. In partnership with Canada Health Infoway, we have assembled a primer for virtual care that can serve as a guide for any health care provider in Canada and globally, with the goal of providing seamless transitions between in-person and virtual care., (©Andy Wong, Rashaad Bhyat, Siddhartha Srivastava, Lysa Boissé Lomax, Ramana Appireddy. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 21.01.2021.)