Search

Abstract This study aims to evaluate whether the implied cost of capital (ICC) model is better than the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) in predicting the realized rate of return for infrastructure firms. We selected a sample of 49 listed companies in Brazil for the period from 2002 to 2014. The CAPM yielded a cost of capital of 11.97% per annum, while the ICC yielded 13.39% per annum, a difference of 1.42% annually. We suggest that a possible explanation for this result is the existence of systematic, non-diversifiable risk, potentially due to regulatory intervention in the business environment. Highlights • This paper aims to evaluate whether the implied cost of capital (ICC) model, in the version developed by Easton (2006), is better than CAPM to predict the realized rate of return (ROR) for infrastructure firms. We selected a sample of 49 Brazilian listed companies from 2002 to 2014. • Our findings, obtained in the pooled regression model, showed that the ICC had a positive and significant correlation with future stock returns, whereas the CAPM did not. • Robustness and Diebold–Mariano tests (1995) corroborated that the ICC is a superior predictor of actual ROR's for the sample of Brazilian utilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this paper is to analyze if the Economic Profit (EP) better explains the Brazilian companies' market value than the Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) or Net Income (NI). Therefore, it contributes to the debate on the superiority of Economic Value Added (EVA®) in explaining a company's value. The results indicate that the EP of the Brazilian companies analyzed from 2005 to 2008 is not comparatively better than the NOPAT or NI. This is a consistent result compared to those based on data from American, Japanese and Greek companies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista de Ciências da Administração is the property of Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Departamento de Ciencias da Administracao and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Revista de Economia e Administração is the property of INSPER Instituto de Ensino e Pesquisa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This article evaluates the potential impacts deriving from the change in required capital of banks in Brazil, with the implementation of Basel III. To do this, a sample of 58 banks was used, which accounts for 80% of the assets in the Brazilian National Financial System, according to the balance sheets of December 2012. The methodology adopted has simulated the need for regulatory capital that will be mandatory in the end of the transition period, in 2019, considering the continuity of risk-weighted assets (RWAs) contained in these financial statements. Assuming that some banks will resort to the capital market to raise their capitalization level, the return on equity (ROE) for the previous three years was analyzed, compared to the cost of equity, estimated by the International Capital Asset Pricing Model (ICAPM). It was found that 23 institutions had some kind of noncompliance with the new regulatory capital, among them the 3 largest federal public banks. It was also observed that 39 banks have a ROE insufficient to attract new investors. The joint analysis of the adequacy of capital structure and the return level may identify occasional vulnerabilities. It is concluded that implementing Basel III in Brazil may increase the search for greater efficiency and profitability. In a future scenario, the Brazilian banking system may observe a wave of mergers and acquisitions and an increased number of initial public offerings (IPOs). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]