1. Ultrahigh-Performance Liquid Chromatography-High-Resolution Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Based Metabolomics Reveals Key Differences between Brachiaria decumbens and B. brizantha, Two Similar Pastures with Different Toxicities.
- Author
-
Pérez AJ, Hussain SM, Pecio Ł, Kowalczyk M, Herling VR, and Stochmal A
- Subjects
- Animal Feed analysis, Animals, Brachiaria classification, Brachiaria metabolism, Brachiaria toxicity, Brazil, Cattle, Diosgenin analysis, Diosgenin metabolism, Diosgenin toxicity, Saponins metabolism, Saponins toxicity, Seasons, Sterols metabolism, Sterols toxicity, Brachiaria chemistry, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid methods, Diosgenin analogs & derivatives, Mass Spectrometry methods, Metabolomics methods, Saponins analysis, Sterols analysis
- Abstract
Several species of Brachiaria (Poaceae) currently cover extensive grazing areas in Brazil, providing valuable source of feed for a large cattle population. However, numerous cases of toxicity outbreaks in livestock have raised concerns on safety of using these plants, especially B. decumbens. In this study, chemometric analysis of ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-high-resolution quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HR-QTOF-MS) data has for the first time uncovered qualitative and quantitative differences between metabolomes of toxic B. decumbens and nontoxic B. brizantha. The steroidal saponin protoneodioscin was established as the main biomarker for B. decumbens when compared to B. brizantha, and therefore the key explanation for their phytochemical differentiation. Quantification of protodioscin in both plants showed no significant differences; consequently, the idea that this compound is solely responsible for toxicity outbreaks must be discarded. Instead, we propose that the added occurrence of its stereoisomer, protoneodioscin, in B. decumbens, can be considered as the probable cause of these events. Interestingly, the greatest concentrations of saponins for both species were reached during winter (B. decumbens = 53.6 ± 5.1 mg·g(-1) dry weight (D.W.); B. brizantha = 25.0 ± 1.9 mg·g(-1) D.W.) and spring (B. decumbens = 49.4 ± 5.0 mg·g(-1) D.W.; B. brizantha = 27.9 ± 1.4 mg·g(-1) D.W.), although in the case of B. decumbens these values do not vary significantly among seasons.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF