Search

While soybeans are among the most consumed crops in the world, most of its production lies in the US, Brazil, and Argentina. The concentration of soybean growing regions in the Americas renders the supply chain vulnerable to regional disruptions. In 2012, anomalous hot and dry conditions occurring simultaneously in these regions led to low soybean yields, which drove global soybean prices to all‐time records. In this study, we explore climate change impacts on simultaneous extreme crop failures as the one from 2012. We develop a hybrid model, coupling a process‐based crop model with a machine learning model, to improve the simulation of soybean production. We assess the frequency and magnitude of events with similar or higher impacts than 2012 under different future scenarios, evaluating anomalies both with respect to present day and future conditions to disentangle the impacts of (changing) climate variability from the long‐term mean trends. We find long‐term trends in mean climate increase the frequency of 2012 analogs by 11–16 times and the magnitude by 4–15% compared to changes in climate variability only depending on the global climate scenario. Conversely, anomalies like the 2012 event due to changes in climate variability show an increase in frequency in each country individually, but not simultaneously across the Americas. We deduce that adaptation of the crop production practice to the long‐term mean trends of climate change may considerably reduce the future risk of simultaneous soybean losses across the Americas. Plain Language Summary: Soybeans are the main source of protein for livestock in the world. Most of its production is concentrated in regions in The United States of America, Brazil, and Argentina. In 2012, simultaneous soybean losses in these three countries due to anomalous weather conditions led to shortages in global supplies and to record prices. In this study, we investigate how climate change can affect future events with similar impacts as the one from 2012. We develop a numerical model to establish relations between weather conditions and soybean yields. We use future scenarios with different levels of global warming, and we analyze the soybean losses with respect to present day and future conditions. We find that the number of simultaneous soybean losses similar to the 2012 event increase in the future due to changes in the mean climate conditions. However, simultaneous soybean production losses due to changes in climate variability are not frequent, despite each country showing frequent regional losses. We deduce that if successful adaptation measures are adopted against the changes in mean climate, the future risk of extreme events such as the 2012 may be considerably reduced with respect to a future without any adaptation. Key Points: A hybrid crop model (i.e., physical crop model combined with machine learning) is presented, which outperforms the benchmark modelsSimultaneous soybean failures in the Americas under climate change are mostly driven by changes in mean climateChanges in climate variability increase country‐level soybean failures but such change is not found for simultaneous failures [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Quantification of water use for rainfed production of Brazilian crops, and simulation of management scenarios. • Green water is a primary resource for production of the crops, both in the present and in prospective scenarios. • We found possibilities of improvement of green water productivity, and limited options for supplemental blue water use. • Irrigation-based intensification results in lower water productivity, when compared to fertilizer-based intensification. Green water is a central resource for global agricultural production. Understanding its role is fundamental to design strategies to increase global food and feed production while avoiding further land conversion, and obtaining more crop per drop. Brazil is a country with high water availability, and a major exporter of agricultural goods and virtual water. We assess here water use and water productivity in Brazil for four major rainfed crops: cotton, maize, soybeans, and wheat. For this, we use the EPIC crop model to perform a spatially explicit assessment of consumptive water use and water productivity under crop management scenarios in Brazil between 1990 and 2013. We investigate four different land-water interactions: (i) water use and productivity for different management scenarios, (ii) the potential of supplemental irrigation for productivity improvement, (iii) changes in green water use throughout the study period, and finally (iv) potential reduction of land and water demand related to agricultural intensification. The results show that, for the studied crops, green water is the main resource for biomass production, and intensification can lead to great improvements in green water productivity. The results also suggest that, despite achieving higher yields, irrigation-based intensification tends to lower overall water productivity, compared to fertilizer-based intensification strategies. This is, however, regionally and crop-specific. Furthermore, due to higher yields and water productivity, producing the same amount of crop output in irrigated or rainfed intensification scenarios would result in the reduction of resource demand, in the order of 34–58 % for cropland, and 29–52 % for water. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]