Search

The Editorial Board of Equinoccio. Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy presents a new issue dedicated to the dialogues between psychoanalysis and other fields of knowledge. The volume includes articles on the relationships between individuals and digital technologies, the articulation between psychoanalysis and the conception of otherness, the dialogue between psychoanalysis and education, otherness in literature and clinical practice, political violence during the pandemic in Brazil, and the connections between psychoanalysis and art. It also includes a section dedicated to Vera Krecl's latest article and a review of a doctoral thesis on the relationship between literature and psychoanalysis. The issue concludes with a conversation about the work of psychologists in care institutions. The Editorial Board emphasizes the importance of building bridges and connections between different ways of thinking about the human experience. The call for submissions for the next issue, which will address relational dynamics as scenarios of suffering in the present, is announced. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: The study preliminarily analyzes the application of the editorial quality criteria of Catalog 2.0 of the Latindex indexer in Brazilian scientific journals and reveals which criteria the reviewed journals least meet, serving as a parameter for editors who would like to request an evaluation of their journals over the term Catalog 2.0. Methodology: Methodology: Based on a quantitative, descriptive, and exploratory approach, the study uses the data generated during the evaluations of journals for Catalog 2.0 of Latindex to understand the editorial quality of the journals evaluated. Results: The results obtained show that the journals previously evaluated high non-compliance rates in the Latindex index, but these failures are mostly associated with non-compliance of specific criteria, which can be easily remedied, as long as the editors and editorial teams pay attention to specificities required by the indexer. Conclusions: The Brazilian scientific journals evaluated for Latindex Catalog 2.0 have high non-compliance rates and tend to fail to attend editorial criteria quality criteria that are important to guarantee the scientificity of this type of publication. Criteria such as “Continuous content generation”, “Peer review system”, “Institutional affiliation of the members of the editorial board”, “Originality requirement”, “Plagiarism detection”, “Use of interoperability protocols” are among those that have the highest non-compliance rates. On the other hand, many evaluated journals have been successful in the evaluation fulfilling these same criteria, which sets out a promising scenario in relation to the editorial quality of these journals. It's the function of the editors and editorial teams to pay attention to the fulfillment of these criteria since they are charged by practically all indexers of scientific journals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The front cover of the journal is presented along with the issue's editors and information on membership and subscriptions.

Copyright of Redes is the property of Redes-Revista Hispana para el Analisis de Redes Sociales and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Rationale and Objectives: We examined the status of women's representation on radiology journal editorial boards around the world and evaluated temporal trends in female board representation., Materials and Methods: Data on the gender of editorial board members, deputy editors, and editors-in-chief of top general radiology journals from the United States and from five continents outside North America was collected, based on listings in mastheads of each journal at 5-year intervals from 1998 to 2018. Female editorial board representation was compared to female membership in national professional radiology organizations and national physician registries., Results: One of 42 editors-in-chief (2.4%), 24 of 135 deputy editors (17.8%), and 345 of 2545 (13.6%) editorial board members were female for the 20-year period. The overall percentage of female editorial board members increased from 9.7% (41 of 423) in 1998 to 17.0% (97 of 569) in 2018 (p < 0.0001). In 2018, women were less represented on the editorial boards than female professional society membership for all geographic regions except Australia/New Zealand; this difference reached statistical significance in Korea, Brazil, Europe, and China. Female editorial board representation ranged from 11.3% to 33.3%, with no significant difference between the United States (21.5%) and other countries., Conclusion: Although the proportion of female editorial board members of radiology journals worldwide has increased over the past two decades, female editorial board composition generally underrepresents the percentage of female radiologists. Editorial board female representation does not differ significantly between the United States and other countries., (Copyright © 2020 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)