Search

Introduction: The technique of open abdomen refers to a surgical procedure that intentionally involves leaving an opening in the abdominal wall. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes, mortality, and morbidity of patients undergoing open abdomen in a public hospital in Brazil and investigate associated risk factors associated with the outcome., Methods: Data from electronic medical records were collected from 2017 to 2022. The variables were used for descriptive analyses, association analysis, and survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier curve., Results: The sample included 104 patients, with 84 presenting with acute abdomen and 20 with trauma, having highly variable ages and comorbidities. Peritonitis and the need for early reoperation were the most common indication for the procedure, each accounting for 34%, and negative pressure wound therapy was the most commonly used technique. Fistula was the most frequent complication, with the majority forming in the early days after the surgery. The number of interventions and open abdomen time obtained statistical significance in comparison with the outcome. The overall mortality rate was 62,5%., Conclusion: Despite open abdomen being a technique that can have benefits in controlling intraabdominal contamination and preventing abdominal compartment syndrome, its implementation is associated with complications. The mortality and complication rates were high in this sample. The decision to use the technique should be individualized and based on several factors, including the indications and the patient's clinical status.

Purpose: COVID-19 is associated with high morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery. Contrary to elective procedures, emergency operations should not be postponed. We aim to evaluate the profile and outcomes of COVID-19 patients who underwent emergency abdominal surgery., Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of perioperative data of COVID-19 patients undergoing emergency surgery from April 2020 to August 2020., Results: Eighty-two patients were evaluated due to abdominal complaints, yielding 22 emergency surgeries. The mean APACHE II and SAPS were 18.7 and 68, respectively. Six patients had a PaO 2 /FiO 2 lower than 200 and more than 50% of parenchymal compromise on chest tomography. The most common indications for emergency surgery were hernias (6; 27.2%). The median length of stay was 30 days, and only two patients required reoperation. Postoperatively, 10 (43.3%) patients needed mechanical ventilation for a mean of 6 days. The overall mortality rate was 31.8%., Conclusion: Both postoperative morbidity and mortality are high in COVID-19 patients with respiratory compromise and abdominal emergencies.

Background and Objective: Although videolaparoscopy has been considered a safe method for many elective procedures, its use in traumatic and non-traumatic acute abdomen needs to be evaluated. The aim of this article is to evaluate the role of videolaparoscopy in non-traumatic acute abdomen as a method of diagnosis and treatment., Methods: Between January 1992 and December 1996, 462 patients' charts were reviewed, retrospectively. Patients were admitted to the emergency room of São Rafael Hospital with symptoms of non-traumatic acute abdomen. Routine investigation of abdominal pain was performed in all patients, followed by videolaparoscopy. The laparoscopic procedures were done with four main purposes: diagnosis (ie, enteritis); diagnosis and treatment (ie, appendicitis); treatment only, when the diagnosis was known (ie, acute cholecystitis); and in cases where the conversion to conventional laparotomy was necessary, indicating the best incision., Results: The vast majority of patients had inflammatory causes of acute abdomen (82.03%); others causes were hemoperitoneum (11.03%), bowel obstruction (3.25%), perforation of a hollow viscera (1.74%), vascular occlusion (1.3%), and negative laparoscopy (0.65%)., Conclusions: This study shows that laparotomy was necessary in only 7.14% of the patients. The videolaparoscopic approach was used for diagnosis (99.35%) and treatment (92.86%) of patients with acute abdomen.

Reintervention in abdominal surgery involves the difficulty of precise indication and the limitations of surgical technics during the operation. It may bring to evidence professional errors. It presents a very high morbimortality index. In order to establish risk factors and death rate, we comparatively analysed the initial diagnoses, the number, the cause and the time of relaparotomy, the existence of associated diseases, the age and the illness severity, using APACHE-II after the first surgical intervention. During a two years period starting 1990 we retrospectively analysed charts of 40 patients submitted to relaparotomy in the Emergency Service of Hospital das Clínicas of Medicine University of São Paulo.