Search

Purpose: Multidisciplinary clinics offer a unique approach to the management of patients with cancer. Yet, limited data exist to show that such clinics affect management. The purpose of this study was to determine whether consultation at a multidisciplinary clinic is associated with selection of active surveillance in patients with low-risk prostate cancer., Patients and Methods: The study comprised 701 men with low-risk prostate cancer managed at three tertiary care centers in Boston, MA in 2009. Patients either obtained consultation at a multidisciplinary prostate cancer clinic, at which they were seen by a combination of urologic, radiation, and medical oncologists in a concurrent setting, or they were seen by individual practitioners in sequential settings. The primary outcome was selection of active surveillance., Results: Crude rates of selection of active surveillance in patients seen at a multidisciplinary clinic were double that of patients seen by individual practitioners (43% v 22%), whereas the proportion of men treated with prostatectomy or radiation decreased by approximately 30% (P < .001). On multivariate logistic regression, older age (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.12; P < .001), unmarried status (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.01 to 2.72; P = .04), increased Charlson comorbidity index (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.77; P = .02), fewer positive cores (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90 to 0.94; P < .001), and consultation at a multidisciplinary clinic (OR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.13 to 4.10; P = .02) were significantly associated with pursuit of active surveillance., Conclusion: Multidisciplinary care is associated with increased selection of active surveillance in men with low-risk prostate cancer. This finding may have an important clinical, social, and economic impact.

Background: Whether organ-conserving treatment by combined-modality therapy (CMT) achieves comparable long-term survival to radical cystectomy (RC) for muscle-invasive bladder cancer (BCa) is largely unknown., Objective: Report long-term outcomes of patients with muscle-invasive BCa treated by CMT., Design, Setting, and Participants: We conducted an analysis of successive prospective protocols at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) treating 348 patients with cT2-4a disease between 1986 and 2006. Median follow-up for surviving patients was 7.7 yr., Interventions: Patients underwent concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT) after maximal transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) plus neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Repeat biopsy was performed after 40 Gy, with initial tumor response guiding subsequent therapy. Those patients showing complete response (CR) received boost chemotherapy and RT. One hundred two patients (29%) underwent RC-60 for less than CR and 42 for recurrent invasive tumors., Measurements: Disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method., Results and Limitations: Seventy-two percent of patients (78% with stage T2) had CR to induction therapy. Five-, 10-, and 15-yr DSS rates were 64%, 59%, and 57% (T2=74%, 67%, and 63%; T3-4=53%, 49%, and 49%), respectively. Five-, 10-, and 15-yr OS rates were 52%, 35%, and 22% (T2: 61%, 43%, and 28%; T3-4=41%, 27%, and 16%), respectively. Among patients showing CR, 10-yr rates of noninvasive, invasive, pelvic, and distant recurrences were 29%, 16%, 11%, and 32%, respectively. Among patients undergoing visibly complete TURBT, only 22% required cystectomy (vs 42% with incomplete TURBT; log-rank p<0.001). In multivariate analyses, clinical T-stage and CR were significantly associated with improved DSS and OS. Use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy did not improve outcomes. No patient required cystectomy for treatment-related toxicity., Conclusions: CMT achieves a CR and preserves the native bladder in >70% of patients while offering long-term survival rates comparable to contemporary cystectomy series. These results support modern bladder-sparing therapy as a proven alternative for selected patients., (Copyright © 2011 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)